Breast cancer screening using digital breast tomosynthesis compared to digital mammography alone for Japanese women

被引:2
|
作者
Ban, Kanako [1 ]
Tsunoda, Hiroko [2 ]
Togashi, Seiko [1 ]
Kawaguchi, Yuko [1 ]
Sato, Takanobu [1 ]
Takahashi, Yoko [1 ]
Nagatsuka, Yoshitaka [1 ]
机构
[1] Tokyo Hlth Serv Assoc, Shinjuku Ku, 1-2 Ichigaya Sadohara Cho, Tokyo 1628402, Japan
[2] St Lukes Int Hosp, Chuo Ku, 9-1 Akashi Cho, Tokyo 1048560, Japan
关键词
Breast cancer screening; Mammography; Digital breast tomosynthesis; 3D mammography; SYNTHESIZED 2-DIMENSIONAL MAMMOGRAPHY; IMPLEMENTATION; COMBINATION; IMAGES;
D O I
10.1007/s12282-020-01180-2
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background The purpose of this study is to confirm the position of DBT in breast cancer screening in Japan, to assess cancer detection rates, recall rates, positive predictive value (PPV), and to evaluate the type of mammographic findings of cancer with the use of digital mammography alone (2DDM) and combined with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT). Methods 11,894 examinations of the opportunistic breast cancer screening using only 2DDM and 2DDM plus DBT were performed from May 1, 2017 to March 31, 2019. The 11,894 women [3535 women who received DBT in addition to 2DDM (3D group) and 8359 who received 2DDM only (2D group)] participated in this study. The study was approved by the Institute's Ethics Committee and all participants provided written informed consent. Results The recall rate was 2.6% for the 3D group and 3.6% for the 2D group (p < 0.01). The cancer detection rate was 0.17% in both 3D and 2D groups (p = 0.978). The positive predictive value (PPV) was 6.5% for the 3D group and 4.7% for the 2D group (p = 0.484). The cause of the decrease in recall rate was due to a decrease in the finding of focal asymmetric density (FAD). Conclusion The recall rate was improved by using DBT for breast cancer screening in Japanese women. Cancer detection rates were exactly the same in DBT and 2DDM groups, so only DBT non-inferiority could be verified. We have verified that breast cancer screening combined with DBT is useful even for Japanese women to reduce unnecessary further examination.
引用
收藏
页码:459 / 464
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Breast cancer screening using digital breast tomosynthesis compared to digital mammography alone for Japanese women
    Kanako Ban
    Hiroko Tsunoda
    Seiko Togashi
    Yuko Kawaguchi
    Takanobu Sato
    Yoko Takahashi
    Yoshitaka Nagatsuka
    Breast Cancer, 2021, 28 : 459 - 464
  • [2] Comparison of Tomosynthesis Plus Digital Mammography and Digital Mammography Alone for Breast Cancer Screening
    Haas, Brian M.
    Kalra, Vivek
    Geisel, Jaime
    Raghu, Madhavi
    Durand, Melissa
    Philpotts, Liane E.
    RADIOLOGY, 2013, 269 (03) : 694 - 700
  • [3] Interval cancer in the Cordoba Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (CBTST): comparison of digital breast tomosynthesis plus digital mammography to digital mammography alone
    Pulido-Carmona, Cristina
    Romero-Martin, Sara
    Raya-Povedano, Jose Luis
    Cara-Garcia, Maria
    Font-Ugalde, Pilar
    Elias-Cabot, Esperanza
    Pedrosa-Garriguet, Margarita
    Alvarez-Benito, Marina
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2024, 34 (08) : 5427 - 5438
  • [4] Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography compared to digital mammography alone: a cohort study within the PROSPR consortium
    Emily F. Conant
    Elisabeth F. Beaber
    Brian L. Sprague
    Sally D. Herschorn
    Donald L. Weaver
    Tracy Onega
    Anna N. A. Tosteson
    Anne Marie McCarthy
    Steven P. Poplack
    Jennifer S. Haas
    Katrina Armstrong
    Mitchell D. Schnall
    William E. Barlow
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2016, 156 : 109 - 116
  • [5] Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography compared to digital mammography alone: a cohort study within the PROSPR consortium
    Conant, Emily F.
    Beaber, Elisabeth F.
    Sprague, Brian L.
    Herschorn, Sally D.
    Weaver, Donald L.
    Onega, Tracy
    Tosteson, Anna N. A.
    McCarthy, Anne Marie
    Poplack, Steven P.
    Haas, Jennifer S.
    Armstrong, Katrina
    Schnall, Mitchell D.
    Barlow, William E.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2016, 156 (01) : 109 - 116
  • [6] BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS OR DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY FOR BREAST CANCER SCREENING?
    Svahn, Tony
    MEDICAL PHYSICS IN THE BALTIC STATES, 2011, : 53 - 56
  • [7] Interval cancer in the Córdoba Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (CBTST): comparison of digital breast tomosynthesis plus digital mammography to digital mammography alone
    Pulido-Carmona, Cristina
    Romero-Martin, Sara
    Raya-Povedano, Jose Luis
    Cara-Garcia, Maria
    Font-Ugalde, Pilar
    Elias-Cabot, Esperanza
    Pedrosa-Garriguet, Margarita
    Alvarez-Benito, Marina
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2024, 34 (8) : 5427 - 5438
  • [8] Addition of Screening Breast US to Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Screening in Women at Average Risk
    Yi, Ann
    Jang, Myoung-jin
    Yim, Dahae
    Kwon, Bo Ra
    Shin, Sung Ui
    Chang, Jung Min
    RADIOLOGY, 2021, 298 (03) : 568 - 575
  • [9] Breast Cancer Screening Using Tomosynthesis in Combination With Digital Mammography
    Friedewald, Sarah M.
    Rafferty, Elizabeth A.
    Rose, Stephen L.
    Durand, Melissa A.
    Plecha, Donna M.
    Greenberg, Julianne S.
    Hayes, Mary K.
    Copit, Debra S.
    Carlson, Kara L.
    Cink, Thomas M.
    Barke, Lora D.
    Greer, Linda N.
    Miller, Dave P.
    Conant, Emily F.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2014, 311 (24): : 2499 - 2507
  • [10] Digital breast tomosynthesis compared to digital mammography in a series of Egyptian women with pathologically proven breast cancer
    Refaat, Rania
    Matar, Mohammed Moh.
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2015, 46 (04): : 1241 - 1248