How to conceptualise energy law and policy for an interdisciplinary audience: The case of post-Brexit UK

被引:13
|
作者
Cairney, Paul [1 ,2 ]
McHarg, Aileen [2 ,3 ]
McEwen, Nicola [2 ,4 ]
Turner, Karen [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Stirling, Stirling, Scotland
[2] UK Energy Res Ctr, London, England
[3] Univ Strathclyde, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[4] Univ Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Energy law and policy; Multi-level policymaking; Energy systems; Complex systems; UK; Scotland; Brexit; ADVOCACY COALITIONS; COMPLEXITY THEORY;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2019.02.022
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Interdisciplinary energy research is essential. It advances our understanding of potential transitions from high to low carbon energy systems. However, it is easier to propose than deliver. It requires translation into a simpler language, to aid communication, but not at the expense of the conceptual language that drives our understanding of complex energy systems. We combine legal, political science, and policy studies to show how to balance the need to communicate accessibly and recognise legal and policymaking complexity. We begin with a statement so accepted in legal studies that it has become a truism: the law in the books is not the same as the law in action. The allocation of legal competences is only one influence on policymaking in a complex system. We describe three key ways to conceptualise this relationship between law, policy, and energy systems, focusing on the: (1) 'on paper' legal separation of powers between different governments, (2) interaction between law and policy in practice, including blurry boundaries between formal responsibility and informal influence, and (3) role of law as one of many contributors to policymaking. We use these approaches to explain the implications of Brexit for UK energy policy.
引用
收藏
页码:459 / 466
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The future of SA-UK trade in a post-Brexit world
    Ismail, Faizel
    Grunder, Jay
    SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS-SAJIA, 2020, 27 (02): : 131 - 146
  • [42] The impact of the post-Brexit migration system on the UK labour market
    Portes, Jonathan
    Springford, John
    CONTEMPORARY SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2023, 18 (02) : 132 - 149
  • [43] Post-Brexit UK Fund Regulation: Equivalence, Divergence or Convergence?
    Elizabeth Howell
    European Business Organization Law Review, 2020, 21 : 611 - 639
  • [44] Performing Brexit: How a post-Brexit world is imagined outside the United Kingdom
    Adler-Nissen, Rebecca
    Galpin, Charlotte
    Rosamond, Ben
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF POLITICS & INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS, 2017, 19 (03): : 573 - 591
  • [45] Legislating for a Post-Brexit Scotland: Scottish Parliamentary Scrutiny of UK Statutory Instruments on Retained EU Law
    Taylor, Robert Brett
    Wilson, Adelyn L. M.
    EDINBURGH LAW REVIEW, 2023, 27 (01) : 34 - 63
  • [46] Envisaging the Post-Brexit Landscape: An Articulation of the Likely Changes to the EU-UK Competition Policy Relationship
    Davison, Leigh M.
    LIVERPOOL LAW REVIEW, 2018, 39 (1-2): : 99 - 121
  • [47] Public money for public goods: The role of ideas in driving agriculture policy in the EU and post-Brexit UK
    Kam, Hermann
    Smith, Heather
    Potter, Clive
    LAND USE POLICY, 2023, 129
  • [48] Rebalancing UK regional and industrial policy post-Brexit and post-Covid-19: lessons learned and priorities for the future
    McCann, Philip
    Ortega-Argiles, Raquel
    Sevinc, Deniz
    Cepeda-Zorrilla, Magda
    REGIONAL STUDIES, 2023, 57 (06) : 1113 - 1125
  • [50] Liberalizing Immigration Policies for the UK Agricultural Sector in the Post-Brexit Era
    Angioloni, Simone
    Berrittella, Maria
    Wu, Ziping
    Aguiar, Angel H.
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC INTEGRATION, 2022, 37 (01) : 158 - 178