Human development, greenhouse gas emissions and sub-national mitigation burdens: a Brazilian perspective

被引:1
|
作者
Ambrosio, Geanderson [1 ]
Da Cunha, Denis Antonio [1 ]
Pires, Marcel Viana [1 ]
Costa, Luis [2 ]
Faria, Raiza Moniz [1 ]
Gurgel, Angelo Costa [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Vicosa, Vicosa, MG, Brazil
[2] Potsdam Inst Climate Impact Res, Potsdam, Germany
[3] Sao Paulo Sch Econ, Fundacao Getulio Vargas, Sao Paulo, Brazil
来源
DISCOVER SUSTAINABILITY | 2021年 / 2卷 / 01期
关键词
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; COUNTRIES; ECONOMY; IMPACTS; FOREST;
D O I
10.1007/s43621-021-00044-9
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
International frameworks for greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation usually disregard country-specific inequalities for the allocation of mitigation burdens. This may hinder low developed regions in a country from achieving development in a socioeconomic perspective, such as the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) of eradicating poverty (SDG1) and hunger (SDG2). We use observed data (1991-2010) of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO(2)eq) emissions and a sub-national human development index (MicroHDI, range [0, 1]) for Brazilian microregions to design a framework where regional mitigation burdens are proportional to the MicroHDI, without compromising national mitigation pledges. According to our results, the less developed Brazilian regions have not been basing their development in emission-intensive activities; instead, the most developed regions have. Between 2011 and 2050, Brazilian cumulative emissions from the sectors most correlated with MicroHDI are expected to be 325 Gt CO(2)eq, of which only 50 Gt are associated with regions of MicroHDI < 0.8. Assuming a national GHG mitigation target of 56.5% in 2050 over 2010 (consistent with limiting global warming to 2 oC), Brazil would emit 190 Gt CO(2)eq instead of 325 Gt and the 135 Gt reduction is only accounted for by regions after reaching MicroHDI >= 0.8. Allocating environmental restrictions to the high-developed regions leaves ground for the least developed ones to pursue development with fewer restrictions. Our heterogeneous framework represents a fairer allocation of mitigation burdens which could be implemented under the concepts of green economy. This work could be an international reference for addressing both environmental and socioeconomic development in developing countries at sub-national level as emphasized by the SDGs.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Greenhouse gas emissions mitigation potential in the commercial and institutional sector
    Subramanyam, Veena
    Ahiduzzaman, Md.
    Kumar, Amit
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2017, 140 : 295 - 304
  • [43] Developing breeding schemes to assist mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions
    Wall, E.
    Simm, G.
    Moran, D.
    ANIMAL, 2010, 4 (03) : 366 - 376
  • [44] ASSESSMENT AND MITIGATION OF GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM GROUNDWATER IRRIGATION
    Kaur, Samanpreet
    Aggarwal, Rajan
    Lal, Rattan
    IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE, 2016, 65 (05) : 762 - 770
  • [45] Mitigation potential and costs for global agricultural greenhouse gas emissions
    Beach, Robert H.
    DeAngelo, Benjamin J.
    Rose, Steven
    Li, Changsheng
    Salas, William
    DelGrosso, Stephen J.
    AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 38 (02) : 109 - 115
  • [46] Exploration and mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions in ruminant and grassland systems
    Paulsen, Hans Marten
    Heidecke, Claudia
    LANDBAUFORSCHUNG, 2019, 69 (01):
  • [47] Strategies for greenhouse gas emissions mitigation in Mediterranean agriculture: A review
    Sanz-Cobena, A.
    Lassaletta, L.
    Aguilera, E.
    del Prado, A.
    Garnier, J.
    Billen, G.
    Iglesias, A.
    Sanchez, B.
    Guardia, G.
    Abalos, D.
    Plaza-Bonilla, D.
    Puigdueta-Bartolome, I.
    Moral, R.
    Galan, E.
    Arriaga, H.
    Merino, P.
    Infante-Amate, J.
    Meijide, A.
    Pardo, G.
    Alvaro-Fuentes, J.
    Gilsanz, C.
    Baez, D.
    Doltra, J.
    Gonzalez-Ubierna, S.
    Cayuela, M. L.
    Menendez, S.
    Diaz-Pines, E.
    Le-Noe, J.
    Quemada, M.
    Estelles, F.
    Calvet, S.
    van Grinsven, H. J. M.
    Westhoek, H.
    Sanz, M. J.
    Gimeno, B. S.
    Vallejo, A.
    Smith, P.
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 238 : 5 - 24
  • [48] Global estimates of potential mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions by agriculture
    C.V. Cole
    J. Duxbury
    J. Freney
    O. Heinemeyer
    K. Minami
    A. Mosier
    K. Paustian
    N. Rosenberg
    N. Sampson
    D. Sauerbeck
    Q. Zhao
    Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 1997, 49 : 221 - 228
  • [49] International shipping and greenhouse gas emissions: From assessment to mitigation
    Corbett, James J.
    Winebrake, James J.
    Wang, Haifeng
    TR News, 2010, (268): : 40 - 44
  • [50] Assessment of mitigation options for greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture
    Gibson, AI
    Jarvis, SC
    Beever, DE
    ApSimon, HM
    Webb, J
    NON-CO2 GREENHOUSE GASES: SCIENTIFIC UNDERSTANDING, CONTROL AND IMPLEMENTATION, 2000, : 321 - 322