Laparoscopic versus open colostomy reversal: A comparative analysis

被引:39
|
作者
Rosen, Michael J. [1 ]
Cobb, William. S. [1 ]
Kercher, Kent W. [1 ]
Heniford, B. Todd [1 ]
机构
[1] Carolinas Med Ctr, Dept Gen Surg, Carolinas Laparoscop & Adv Surg Program, Charlotte, NC 28232 USA
关键词
laparoscopy; colostomy reversal; comparative trial; colorectal surgery; Hartmann's procedure;
D O I
10.1016/j.gassur.2005.11.008
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Open colostomy reversal carries significant rates of wound infection, anastomotic leak, and incisional hernia which often limit its acceptance. We hypothesized that the laparoscopic approach to the restoration of intestinal continuity may result in lower perioperative morbidity and faster postoperative recovery. Twenty-two cases of laparoscopic colostomy reversals performed at a single institution were identified and compared to 22 randomly selected open colostomy closures performed during the same time period. Patients were compared based on demographics, previous indications for colostomy procedures, and perioperative outcomes. A total of 152 patients underwent reversal of left-sided colostomies during the study period. The laparoscopic approach was successful in 20 of 22 cases;, there were 2 conversions to open (9%) secondary to inability to adequately mobilize the rectal stump. The laparoscopic and open groups were 2 comparable based on mean age (54 years versus 49 years; P = 0.23), BMI (26 kg/m(2) versus 27 kg/m(2); P = 0.66), gender (9% males versus 13% males; P = 0.23), ASA Class (2.6 versus 2.3; P = 0.07), and history of previous intra-abdominal sepsis (17 versus 16 cases). Operative times were similar (158 versus 189 minutes; P = 0.16), and estimated blood loss was significantly less in the laparoscopic group (113 versus 270 ml; P = 0.01). No intraoperative complications occurred in the laparoscopic group and two enterotomies occurred in the open group. The laparoscopic group had earlier passage of flatus (3.5 versus 5.0 days, P = 0.001) and shorter hospitalization (4.2 versus 7.3 days; P = 0.001). Perioperative complications occurred in 3 (14%) laparoscopic and 13 (59%) open cases (P = 0.01). There was no mortality in this series. The laparoscopic approach can be safely used in the restoration of intestinal continuity. It results in a decreased perioperative morbidity and faster recovery, and it offers distinct advantages over the open approach to colostomy reversal.
引用
收藏
页码:895 / 900
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Laparoscopic versus open Hartmann’s reversal: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Valerio Celentano
    Mariano Cesare Giglio
    Luigi Bucci
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2015, 30 : 1603 - 1615
  • [22] Laparoscopic versus open Hartmann's reversal: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Celentano, Valerio
    Giglio, Mariano Cesare
    Bucci, Luigi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2015, 30 (12) : 1603 - 1615
  • [23] A comparison of complications associated with colostomy reversal versus ileostomy reversal
    Bell, C
    Asolati, M
    Hamilton, E
    Fleming, J
    Nwariaku, F
    Sarosi, G
    Anthony, T
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2005, 190 (05): : 717 - 720
  • [24] Laparoscopic versus open splenectomy: A comparative study
    Franciosi, C
    Caprotti, R
    Romano, F
    Porta, G
    Real, G
    Colombo, G
    Uggeri, F
    E.A.E.S: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF THE EUROPEAN ASSOCIATION FOR ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY, 2000, : 297 - 303
  • [25] Laparoscopic versus open ureterolithotomy - A comparative study
    Skrepetis, K
    Doumas, K
    Siafakas, I
    Lykourinas, M
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2001, 40 (01) : 32 - 36
  • [26] Laparoscopic versus open splenectomy: A comparative study
    Franciosi, C
    Caprotti, R
    Romano, F
    Porta, G
    Real, G
    Colombo, G
    Uggeri, F
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2000, 10 (05): : 291 - 295
  • [27] A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS OPEN CHOLECYSTECTOMY
    Rao, D. Gopal
    Suryanarayana, K.
    Srinivas, T.
    Satish, B.
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2015, 4 (74): : 12916 - 12919
  • [28] Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy, A Comparative Study
    Shaikh, Muhammad Rauf
    Ali, Aun
    Saeed, Summaya
    Ali, Naveed
    Rauf, Hiba
    Shaikh, Noshad A.
    JOURNAL OF THE LIAQUAT UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES, 2019, 18 (02): : 90 - 93
  • [29] Laparoscopic versus open-component separation: a comparative analysis in a porcine model
    Rosen, Michael J.
    Williams, Christina
    Jin, Judy
    McGee, Michael F.
    Schomisch, Steve
    Marks, Jeffrey
    Ponsky, Jeffrey
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2007, 194 (03): : 385 - 389
  • [30] Comparative Analysis of the Safety and Feasibility of Laparoscopic Versus Open Segment 7 Hepatectomy
    Zeng, Haitao
    Xiong, Xiaoli
    Huang, Song
    Zhang, Jia
    Liu, Hongliang
    Huang, Yong
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2024, 34 (06): : 614 - 618