Relationship between residual feed intake and digestibility for lactating Holstein cows fed high and low starch diets

被引:52
|
作者
Potts, S. B. [1 ]
Boerman, J. P. [1 ]
Lock, A. L. [1 ]
Allen, M. S. [1 ]
VandeHaar, M. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Dept Anim Sci, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
digestibility depression; feed efficiency; dry matter intake; BEEF-CATTLE; DAIRY-COWS; NUTRIENT DIGESTIBILITY; DIVERGENT SELECTION; MILK-PRODUCTION; EFFICIENCY; DIGESTION; FIBER; PERFORMANCE; COMMUNITY;
D O I
10.3168/jds.2016-11079
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
We determined if differences in digestibility among cows explained variation in residual feed intake (RFI) in 4 crossover design experiments. Lactating Holstein cows (n = 109; 120 +/- 30 d in milk; mean +/- SD) were fed diets high (HS) or low (LS) in starch. The HS diets were 30% (+/- 1.8%) starch and 27% (+/- 1.2%) neutral detergent fiber (NDF); LS diets were 14% (+/- 2.2%) starch and 40% (+/- 5.3%) NDF. Each experiment consisted of two 28-d treatment periods, with apparent total-tract digestibility measured using indigestible NDF as an internal marker during the last 5 d of each period. Individual cow dry matter (DM) intake and milk yield were recorded daily, body weight was measured 3 to 5 times per week, and milk components were analyzed 2 d/wk. Individual DM intake was regressed on milk energy output, metabolic body weight, body energy gain, and fixed effects of parity, experiment, cohort (a group of cows that received treatments in the same sequence) nested within experiment, and diet nested within cohort and experiment, with the residual being RFI. High RFI cows ate more than expected and were deemed less efficient. Residual feed intake correlated negatively with digestibility of starch for both HS (r = -0.31) and LS (r = -0.23) diets, and with digestibilities of DM (r = -0.30) and NDF (r = -0.23) for LS diets but was not correlated with DM or NDF digestibility for HS diets. For each cohort within an experiment, cows were classified as high RFI (HRFI; >0.5 SD), medium RFI (MRFI; +/- 0.5 SD), and low RFI (LRFI; <-0.5 SD). Digestibility of DM was similar (similar to 66%) among HRFI and LRFI for HS diets but greater for LRFI when fed LS diets (64 vs. 62%). For LS diets, digestibility of DM could account for up to 31% of the differences among HRFI and LRFI for apparent diet energy density, as determined from individual cow performance, indicating that digestibility explains some of the between-animal differences for the ability to convert gross energy into net energy. Some of the differences in digestibility between HRFI and LRFI were expected because cows with high RFI eat at a greater multiple of maintenance, and greater intake is associated with increased passage rate and digestibility depression. Based on these data, we conclude that a cow's digestive ability explains none of the variation in RFI for cows eating high starch diets but 9 to 31% of the variation in RFI when cows are fed low starch diets. Perhaps differences in other metabolic processes, such as tissue turnover, heat production, or others related to maintenance, can account for more variation in RFI than digestibility.
引用
收藏
页码:265 / 278
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Impact of parity differences on residual feed intake estimation in Holstein cows
    Cavani, Ligia
    Gaddis, Kristen L. Parker
    Baldwin, Ransom L.
    Santos, Jose E. P.
    Koltes, James E.
    Tempelman, Robert J.
    VandeHaar, Michael J.
    Caputo, Malia J. M.
    White, Heather M.
    Penagaricano, Francisco
    Weigel, Kent A.
    JDS COMMUNICATIONS, 2023, 4 (03): : 201 - 204
  • [32] Association of Residual Feed Intake With Blood Metabolites and Reproduction in Holstein Cows
    Marinho, Mariana Nehme
    Santos, Jose E. P.
    FRONTIERS IN ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2022, 3
  • [33] RESPONSE OF LACTATING HOLSTEIN COWS TO DIETS VARYING IN FIBER SOURCE AND RUMINAL STARCH DEGRADABILITY
    POORE, MH
    MOORE, JA
    SWINGLE, RS
    ECK, TP
    BROWN, WH
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 1993, 76 (08) : 2235 - 2243
  • [34] Silage of residue from the extraction of cassava starch in diets from lactating holstein cows
    Zambom, Maximiliane Alavarse
    Fernandes, Tatiane
    Schmidt, Emerson Luis
    Gouveia Goncalves, Joao Arlindo
    dos Santos Pozza, Magali Soares
    Javorski, Cleovani Rossi
    de Souza, Leiliane Cristine
    dos Reis Tinini, Rodrigo Cezar
    SEMINA-CIENCIAS AGRARIAS, 2015, 36 (03): : 1701 - 1712
  • [35] ZN-65 TISSUE DISTRIBUTION IN LACTATING HOLSTEIN COWS FED NORMAL AND LOW ZINC PRACTICAL DIETS
    NEATHERY, MW
    MILLER, WJ
    BLACKMON, DM
    GENTRY, RP
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1974, 38 (04) : 854 - 859
  • [36] EFFECT OF ESTRADIOL, DIETS AND LENGHT OF THE DRY PERIOD ON FEED INTAKE OF HOLSTEIN COWS
    Andrade Correia Teixeira, Lucia de Fatima
    Olalquiaga Perez, Juan Ramon
    Ferreira, Daniel Furtado
    de Souza, Jose Camisao
    Muniz, Joel Augusto
    Herbert Head, H.
    CIENCIA E AGROTECNOLOGIA, 2003, 27 (04): : 903 - 911
  • [37] Liver Transcriptome Analysis Reveals Important Genes Involved in the Feed Efficiency of Lactating Cows Fed a High and Low Starch Diet
    Dai, Xiaoxia
    Li, Wenli
    Fischer, Amelie
    Kalscheur, Kenneth
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2021, 99 : 177 - 177
  • [38] Association of milk metabolites with feed intake and traits impacting feed efficiency in lactating Holstein dairy cows
    James, Leonora M.
    Mayes, Mary S.
    Siberski-Cooper, Cori J.
    Breitzman, Matthew W.
    Vandehaar, Michael J.
    Koltes, James E.
    FRONTIERS IN ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2024, 5
  • [39] Short-term feed intake is regulated by macronutrient oxidation in lactating Holstein cows
    Derno, M.
    Nuernberg, G.
    Schoen, P.
    Schwarm, A.
    Roentgen, M.
    Hammon, H. M.
    Metges, C. C.
    Bruckmaier, R. M.
    Kuhla, B.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2013, 96 (02) : 971 - 980
  • [40] Predicting feed intake and heath events using sensor data in lactating Holstein cows
    Siberski, C. J.
    Mayes, M. S.
    Gorden, P. J.
    Copeland, A.
    Healey, M.
    Goetz, B. M.
    Beiki, H.
    Kramer, L. M.
    Baumgard, L. H.
    Dixon, P.
    Koltes, J. E.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2020, 103 : 271 - 271