The Assessment of Mindfulness with Self-Report Measures: Existing Scales and Open Issues

被引:111
|
作者
Bergomi, Claudia [1 ]
Tschacher, Wolfgang [1 ]
Kupper, Zeno [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bern, Univ Hosp Psychiat, Dept Psychotherapy, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
关键词
Mindfulness; Assessment; Self-Report; Questionnaire; ATTENTION AWARENESS SCALE; EMOTION REGULATION; STRESS REDUCTION; VALIDATION; VALIDITY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SPIRITUALITY; RELIABILITY; ACCEPTANCE; DEPRESSION;
D O I
10.1007/s12671-012-0110-9
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
During recent years, mindfulness-based approaches have been gaining relevance for treatment in clinical populations. Correspondingly, the empirical study of mindfulness has steadily grown; thus, the availability of valid measures of the construct is critically important. This paper gives an overview of the current status in the field of self-report assessment of mindfulness. All eight currently available and validated mindfulness scales (for adults) are evaluated, with a particular focus on their virtues and limitations and on differences among them. It will be argued that none of these scales may be a fully adequate measure of mindfulness, as each of them offers unique advantages but also disadvantages. In particular, none of them seems to provide a comprehensive assessment of all aspects of mindfulness in samples from the general population. Moreover, some scales may be particularly indicated in investigations focusing on specific populations such as clinical samples (Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale, Southampton Mindfulness Questionnaire) or meditators (Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory). Three main open issues are discussed: (1) the coverage of aspects of mindfulness in questionnaires; (2) the nature of the relationships between these aspects; and (3) the validity of self-report measures of mindfulness. These issues should be considered in future developments in the self-report assessment of mindfulness.
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 202
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] SELF-REPORT AND BEHAVIORAL MEASURES IN THE ASSESSMENT OF ASSERTIVE-BEHAVIOR
    BOURQUE, P
    LADOUCEUR, R
    JOURNAL OF BEHAVIOR THERAPY AND EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHIATRY, 1979, 10 (04) : 287 - 292
  • [22] Assessment of Self-Report Measures for Predicting Population Prevalence of Periodontitis
    Eke, Paul I.
    Dye, Bruce
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2009, 80 (09) : 1371 - 1379
  • [23] ECOLOGICAL MOMENTARY ASSESSMENT DOES NOT INFLUENCE SELF-REPORT MEASURES
    Cajita, Mia
    Burke, Lora E.
    ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2021, 55 : S170 - S170
  • [24] ASSESSMENT OF PAIN: COMPARISONS BETWEEN SELF-REPORT AND EXPERIMENTAL MEASURES
    Baggio, Stephanie
    al'Absi, Mustafa
    PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE, 2016, 78 (03): : A107 - A107
  • [25] Effects of technology-mediated mindfulness practice on stress: psychophysiological and self-report measures
    Balconi, Michela
    Fronda, Giulia
    Crivelli, Davide
    STRESS-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON THE BIOLOGY OF STRESS, 2019, 22 (02): : 200 - 209
  • [26] SELF-REPORT SCALES FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF DEPRESSION
    PLUTCHIK, R
    CONTE, HR
    PSYCHIATRIC ANNALS, 1989, 19 (07) : 367 - 371
  • [28] Predicting physical health - Implicit mental health measures versus self-report scales
    Cousineau, Tara McKee
    Shedler, Jonathan
    JOURNAL OF NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE, 2006, 194 (06) : 427 - 432
  • [29] Self-report measures in the assessment of rheumatoid arthritis, with an emphasis on ecological validity
    Kaell, AT
    Broderick, JE
    Stone, AA
    TECHNOLOGY AND METHODS IN BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 1998, : 133 - 161
  • [30] The assessment of views on ageing: a review of self-report measures and innovative extensions
    Klusmann, Verena
    Notthoff, Nanna
    Beyer, Ann-Kristin
    Blawert, Anne
    Gabrian, Martina
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGEING, 2020, 17 (04) : 403 - 433