The Assessment of Mindfulness with Self-Report Measures: Existing Scales and Open Issues

被引:111
|
作者
Bergomi, Claudia [1 ]
Tschacher, Wolfgang [1 ]
Kupper, Zeno [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bern, Univ Hosp Psychiat, Dept Psychotherapy, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
关键词
Mindfulness; Assessment; Self-Report; Questionnaire; ATTENTION AWARENESS SCALE; EMOTION REGULATION; STRESS REDUCTION; VALIDATION; VALIDITY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SPIRITUALITY; RELIABILITY; ACCEPTANCE; DEPRESSION;
D O I
10.1007/s12671-012-0110-9
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
During recent years, mindfulness-based approaches have been gaining relevance for treatment in clinical populations. Correspondingly, the empirical study of mindfulness has steadily grown; thus, the availability of valid measures of the construct is critically important. This paper gives an overview of the current status in the field of self-report assessment of mindfulness. All eight currently available and validated mindfulness scales (for adults) are evaluated, with a particular focus on their virtues and limitations and on differences among them. It will be argued that none of these scales may be a fully adequate measure of mindfulness, as each of them offers unique advantages but also disadvantages. In particular, none of them seems to provide a comprehensive assessment of all aspects of mindfulness in samples from the general population. Moreover, some scales may be particularly indicated in investigations focusing on specific populations such as clinical samples (Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale, Southampton Mindfulness Questionnaire) or meditators (Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory). Three main open issues are discussed: (1) the coverage of aspects of mindfulness in questionnaires; (2) the nature of the relationships between these aspects; and (3) the validity of self-report measures of mindfulness. These issues should be considered in future developments in the self-report assessment of mindfulness.
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 202
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Assessment of Mindfulness with Self-Report Measures: Existing Scales and Open Issues
    Claudia Bergomi
    Wolfgang Tschacher
    Zeno Kupper
    Mindfulness, 2013, 4 : 191 - 202
  • [2] Assessment of mindfulness by self-report
    Baer, Ruth
    CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 28 : 42 - 48
  • [3] Assessment of mindfulness by self-report - The Kentucky inventory of mindfulness skills
    Baer, RA
    Smith, GT
    Allen, KB
    ASSESSMENT, 2004, 11 (03) : 191 - 206
  • [4] Issues and strategies for reducing the length of self-report scales
    Stanton, JM
    Sinar, EF
    Balzer, WK
    Smith, PC
    PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 55 (01) : 167 - 194
  • [5] The Measurement of Boredom: Differences Between Existing Self-Report Scales
    Mercer-Lynn, Kimberley B.
    Flora, David B.
    Fahlman, Shelley A.
    Eastwood, John D.
    ASSESSMENT, 2013, 20 (05) : 585 - 596
  • [6] IMAGERY ASSESSMENT BY SELF-REPORT AND BEHAVIORAL MEASURES
    DANAHER, BG
    THORESEN, CE
    BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 1972, 10 (02) : 131 - &
  • [7] Health, optimism and mindfulness: Exploring relationships using self-report measures
    Morrisroe, R.
    Di Blasi, Z.
    Evans, D.
    PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH, 2010, 25 : 62 - 62
  • [8] Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness
    Baer, RA
    Smith, GT
    Hopkins, J
    Krietemeyer, J
    Toney, L
    ASSESSMENT, 2006, 13 (01) : 27 - 45
  • [9] Self-consciousness concept and assessment in self-report measures
    DaSilveira, Amanda
    DeSouza, Mariane L.
    Gomes, William B.
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 6
  • [10] Assessment of soundscapes using self-report and physiological measures
    Durbridge, Simon
    Murphy, Damian Thomas
    ACTA ACUSTICA, 2023, 7 (05): : 12 - 25