Comparison of the clinical performance and usefulness of five SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests

被引:14
|
作者
Wakita, Mitsuru [1 ]
Idei, Mayumi [2 ,3 ]
Saito, Kaori [2 ]
Horiuchi, Yuki [2 ]
Yamatani, Kotoko [2 ]
Ishikawa, Suzuka [4 ]
Yamamoto, Takamasa [1 ]
Igawa, Gene [1 ]
Hinata, Masanobu [1 ]
Kadota, Katsuhiko [5 ]
Kurosawa, Taro [6 ]
Takahashi, Sho [6 ]
Saito, Takumi [7 ]
Misawa, Shigeki [1 ]
Akazawa, Chihiro [8 ]
Naito, Toshio [9 ]
Miida, Takashi [2 ]
Takahashi, Kazuhisa [10 ]
Ai, Tomohiko [2 ,11 ]
Tabe, Yoko [2 ,12 ]
机构
[1] Juntendo Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Lab, Tokyo, Japan
[2] Juntendo Univ, Dept Clin Lab Med, Fac Med, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Juntendo Univ, Med Technol Innovat Ctr, Fac Med, Tokyo, Japan
[4] Tokyo Med & Dent Univ, Sch Hlth Care Sci, Tokyo, Japan
[5] Juntendo Univ, Emergency & Disaster Med, Fac Med, Tokyo, Japan
[6] Juntendo Univ, Dept Gastroenterol, Fac Med, Tokyo, Japan
[7] Juntendo Univ, Dept Internal Med & Rheumatol, Sch Med, Tokyo, Japan
[8] Juntendo Univ, Intractable Dis Res Ctr, Grad Sch Med, Tokyo, Japan
[9] Juntendo Univ, Dept Gen Med, Fac Med, Tokyo, Japan
[10] Juntendo Univ, Dept Resp Med, Fac Med, Tokyo, Japan
[11] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Dept Med, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[12] Juntendo Univ, Dept Next Generat Hematol Lab Med, Grad Sch Med, Tokyo, Japan
来源
PLOS ONE | 2021年 / 16卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0246536
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
We examined the usefulness of five COVID-19 antibody detection tests using 114 serum samples at various time points from 34 Japanese COVID-19 patients. We examined Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 from Roche, and four immunochromatography tests from Hangzhou Laihe Biotech, Artron Laboratories, Chil, and Nadal. In the first week after onset, Elecsys had 40% positivity in Group S (severe cases) but was negative in Group M (mild-moderate cases). The immunochromatography kits showed 40-60% and 0-8% positivity in Groups S and M, respectively. In the second week, Elecsys showed 75% and 50% positivity, and the immunochromatography tests showed 5-80% and 50-75% positivity in Groups S and M, respectively. After the third week, Elecsys showed 100% positivity in both groups. The immunochromatography kits showed 100% positivity in Group S. In Group M, positivity decreased to 50% for Chil and 75-89% for Artron and Lyher. Elecsys and immunochromatography kits had 91-100% specificity. Elecsys had comparable chronological change of cut-off index values in the two groups from the second week to the sixth week. The current SARS-CoV-2 antibody detection tests do not provide meaningful interpretation of severity and infection status. Its use might be limited to short-term epidemiological studies.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of Clinical Manifestations of Kawasaki Disease According to SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Positivity
    Kim, Jin Ho
    You, Jihye
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 38 (24)
  • [22] Antibody tests for identification of current and past infection with SARS-CoV-2
    Deeks, Jonathan J.
    Dinnes, Jacqueline
    Takwoingil, Yemisi
    Davenport, Clare
    Spijker, Ren
    Taylor-Phillips, Sian
    Adrianol, Ada
    Beesel, Sophie
    Dretzkel, Janine
    di Ruffanol, Lavinia Ferrante
    Harris, Isobel M.
    Price, Malcolm J.
    Dittrich, Sabine
    Emperador, Devy
    Hooft, Lotty
    Leeflang, Mariska M. G.
    Van den Bruel, Ann
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2020, (06):
  • [23] Sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests with late convalescent sera
    Kannenberg, Judith
    Schnurra, Carolin
    Reiners, Nina
    Henschler, Reinhard
    Buhmann, Raymund
    Kaiser, Thorsten
    Biemann, Ronald
    Hoenemann, Mario
    Ackermann, Grit
    Trawinski, Henning
    Jassoy, Christian
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY PLUS, 2021, 1 (03):
  • [24] Comparison of Four Systems for SARS-CoV-2 Antibody at Three Time Points after SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination
    Seo, Jong Do
    Nam, Minjeong
    Lee, Tae Hwan
    Ahn, Yeon-Sun
    Shin, Seon-Hyeon
    Han, Hye Young
    Moon, Hee-Won
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2022, 12 (06)
  • [25] Performance of SARS-CoV-2 serology tests: Are they good enough?
    Piec, Isabelle
    English, Emma
    Thomas, Mary Annette
    Dervisevic, Samir
    Fraser, William D.
    John, William Garry
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (02):
  • [26] Five Commercial Immunoassays for SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Determination and Their Comparison and Correlation with the Virus Neutralization Test
    Simanek, Vaclav
    Pecen, Ladislav
    Kratka, Zuzana
    Furst, Tomas
    Rezackova, Hana
    Topolcan, Ondrej
    Fajfrlik, Karel
    Sedlacek, Dalibor
    Sin, Robin
    Pazdiora, Petr
    Zelena, Hana
    Slouka, David
    Kucera, Radek
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2021, 11 (04)
  • [27] Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody response in PCR positive patients: Comparison of nine tests in relation to clinical data
    Naaber, Paul
    Hunt, Kaidi
    Pesukova, Jaana
    Haljasmagi, Liis
    Rumm, Pauliina
    Peterson, Part
    Hololejenko, Jelena
    Eero, Irina
    Jogi, Piia
    Toompere, Karolin
    Sepp, Epp
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (10):
  • [28] Performance characteristics of five immunoassays for SARS-CoV-2: a head-to-head benchmark comparison
    Stoesser, Nicole
    LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2020, 20 (12): : 1390 - 1400
  • [29] Comparison of diagnostic performances of different serological tests for SARS-CoV-2 antibody detection in cats and dogs
    Ratti, Gabriele
    Lelli, Davide
    Moreno, Ana
    Stranieri, Angelica
    Trogu, Tiziana
    Giordano, Alessia
    Grassi, Andrea
    Luzzago, Camilla
    Decaro, Nicola
    Paltrinieri, Saverio
    Lauzi, Stefania
    TRANSBOUNDARY AND EMERGING DISEASES, 2022, 69 (06) : 3530 - 3539
  • [30] A comparison of five epidemiological models for transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in India
    Soumik Purkayastha
    Rupam Bhattacharyya
    Ritwik Bhaduri
    Ritoban Kundu
    Xuelin Gu
    Maxwell Salvatore
    Debashree Ray
    Swapnil Mishra
    Bhramar Mukherjee
    BMC Infectious Diseases, 21