Seismic parameters' combinations for the optimum prediction of the damage state of R/C buildings using neural networks

被引:94
|
作者
Morfidis, Konstantinos [1 ]
Kostinakis, Konstantinos [2 ]
机构
[1] Earthquake Planning & Protect Org EPPO ITSAK, Thessaloniki 55535, Greece
[2] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Dept Civil Engn, Aristotle Univ Campus, Thessaloniki 54124, Greece
关键词
Seismic damage prediction; Artificial neural networks; Reinforced concrete buildings; Structural vulnerability; Ground motion parameters; IDENTIFICATION; PERFORMANCE; ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.1016/j.advengsoft.2017.01.001
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The aim of the present paper is to investigate the number and the combination of 14 seismic parameters through which an optimum prediction for the damage state of r/c buildings can be achieved using Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs). Multilayer perceptron networks are utilized. For the training of the ANNs a data set is created using results from Nonlinear Time History Analyses of 30 r/c buildings With different structural dynamic characteristics, which are subjected to 65 actual ground motions. The Maximum Inter storey Drift Ratio is used as the damage index. Two versions of the "Stepwise method", i.e. the Forward Stepwise Method and the Backward Stepwise Method, as well as the "Weights Method", are adopted as methods for the investigation of the most effective combinations of the examined seismic parameters. The most significant Conclusion that turned out is that ANNs can predict adequately the seismic damage state of r/c buildings if at least 5 seismic parameters are used as inputs. The classification of the seismic parameters on the basis of their correlation with the damage state is not unique, since it depends to the configuration and the training algorithm of ANNs as well as the method which is utilized for the classification. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 16
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The impact of successive earthquakes on the seismic damage of multistorey 3D R/C buildings
    Kostinakis, Konstantinos
    Morfidis, Konstantinos
    EARTHQUAKES AND STRUCTURES, 2017, 12 (01) : 1 - 12
  • [32] Impact of the masonry infills on the correlation between seismic intensity measures and damage of R/C buildings
    Kostinakis, Konstantinos G.
    EARTHQUAKES AND STRUCTURES, 2018, 14 (01) : 55 - 71
  • [33] Prediction of CEC using fractal parameters by artificial neural networks
    Bayat, Hossein
    Davatgar, Naser
    Jalali, Mohsen
    INTERNATIONAL AGROPHYSICS, 2014, 28 (02) : 143 - 152
  • [34] Prediction of the Soil Compaction Parameters Using Deep Neural Networks
    Kareem Othman
    Hassan Abdelwahab
    Transportation Infrastructure Geotechnology, 2023, 10 : 147 - 164
  • [35] Prediction of Strawberries' Quality Parameters Using Artificial Neural Networks
    Amoriello, Tiziana
    Ciccoritti, Roberto
    Ferrante, Patrizia
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2022, 12 (04):
  • [36] Prediction of the Soil Compaction Parameters Using Deep Neural Networks
    Othman, Kareem
    Abdelwahab, Hassan
    TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE GEOTECHNOLOGY, 2023, 10 (01) : 147 - 164
  • [37] Prediction of pressure coefficients on roofs of low buildings using artificial neural networks
    Chen, Y
    Kopp, GA
    Surry, D
    JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 2003, 91 (03) : 423 - 441
  • [38] The influence of seismic intensity parameters on structural damage of RC buildings using principal components analysis
    Massumi, Ali
    Gholami, Fatemeh
    APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2016, 40 (03) : 2161 - 2176
  • [39] Adaptive thermal load prediction in residential buildings using artificial neural networks
    Fouladfar, Mohammad Hossein
    Soppelsa, Anton
    Nagpal, Himanshu
    Fedrizzi, Roberto
    Franchini, Giuseppe
    JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2023, 77
  • [40] PREDICTION THE HEAT CONSUMPTION OF SOCIAL AND PUBLIC SECTOR BUILDINGS USING NEURAL NETWORKS
    Parfenenko, Yu, V
    Shendrik, V. V.
    Galichenko, O. P.
    RADIO ELECTRONICS COMPUTER SCIENCE CONTROL, 2015, 2 : 41 - 46