Are energy policies for supporting low-carbon power generation killing energy storage?

被引:14
|
作者
Lai, Chun Sing [1 ,2 ]
Locatelli, Giorgio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, Sch Civil Engn, Fac Engn & Phys Sci, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Brunel Univ London, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, Brunel Inst Power Syst, London UB8 3PH, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Energy storage; Low-carbon power incentives; Contract for difference; Generation integrated energy storage; SMALL MODULAR REACTORS; LEVELIZED COST; SYSTEM; ELECTRICITY; OPTIONS; NUCLEAR; TECHNOLOGY; HYDROGEN; MARKET; SMR;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124626
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper explores the impacts of energy policies for supporting low-carbon infrastructure on the economic and financial performance of energy storage when coupled with a generator. The study sets in the UK context and the unit of analysis is the generator connected with energy storage. An analytical method is derived to assess the impact of policy schemes for low-carbon infrastructure on energy storage. The case study of energy storage systems coupled with a Small Modular nuclear Reactor (SMR) is quantitatively investigated in three scenarios: 1. SMR-only (the baseline); 2. SMR with thermal energy storage; and 3. SMR with Lithium-ion battery. For the strike price at 100 /MWh, the net present value for scenarios 2 and 3 reduces from 562 M pound to 379 M pound and from 376 M pound to-1144 M pound, respectively, when the energy storage capacity increases from 100 MWh to 1 GWh. As the net present value reduces with increased energy storage capacity (when coupled with generation), this work shows that low-carbon incentives are, unintentionally, barriers to the development of energy storage due to: (A) current generator incentives give a favourable return on investment and energy storage would diminish it; (B) energy storage cannot participate in generator only incentives. (c) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The COVID-19 pandemic and energy transitions: Evidence from low-carbon power generation in China
    Li, Kai
    Qi, Shaozhou
    Shi, Xunpeng
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 368
  • [42] Capacity Allocation Strategy of Energy Storage in Low-Carbon Park Considering Equivalent Energy Storage Characteristics of Thermal System
    Chen H.
    He G.
    Liu Y.
    Zeng H.
    Zhang S.
    Li Y.
    Shanghai Jiaotong Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2024, 58 (06): : 863 - 871
  • [43] Low-carbon energy solution in China
    Sun, Yuhan
    Tang, Zhiyong
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2014, 248
  • [44] No quick switch to low-carbon energy
    Kramer, Gert Jan
    Haigh, Martin
    NATURE, 2009, 462 (7273) : 568 - 569
  • [45] Culture and low-carbon energy transitions
    Sovacool, Benjamin K.
    Griffiths, Steve
    NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 3 (09) : 685 - 693
  • [46] Making low-carbon energy sustainable
    Grubert, Emily
    Lazaro, Lira Luz Benites
    Merfort, Leon
    Popp, Alexander
    Luo, Tianyi
    Kati, Vassiliki
    Meshram, Pratima
    Dorn, Felix M.
    Hernandez, Diana
    ONE EARTH, 2024, 7 (02): : 163 - 166
  • [47] Culture and low-carbon energy transitions
    Benjamin K. Sovacool
    Steve Griffiths
    Nature Sustainability, 2020, 3 : 685 - 693
  • [48] No quick switch to low-carbon energy
    Gert Jan Kramer
    Martin Haigh
    Nature, 2009, 462 : 568 - 569
  • [49] Call for low-carbon energy research
    不详
    TCE, 2008, (800): : 18 - 18
  • [50] A quasi-automated generation control strategy for multiple energy storage systems to optimize low-carbon benefits
    Yan, Gangui
    Zheng, Xudong
    Mu, Gang
    Li, Junhui
    Cui, Yang
    Wang, Yue
    JOURNAL OF MODERN POWER SYSTEMS AND CLEAN ENERGY, 2015, 3 (01) : 93 - 102