Requirements of an underwater sensor-networking platform for environmental monitoring

被引:5
|
作者
Ryecroft, Samuel P. [1 ]
Shaw, Andy [1 ]
Fergus, Paul [1 ]
Kot, Patryk [1 ]
Muradov, Magomed [1 ]
Moody, Adam [2 ]
Conroy, Laura [2 ]
机构
[1] Liverpool John Moores Univ, BEST Res Inst, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[2] United Util, Warrington, Cheshire, England
来源
2018 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DEVELOPMENTS IN ESYSTEMS ENGINEERING (DESE 2018) | 2018年
关键词
wireless sensor networks; environmental monitoring; underwater sensor networks; WATER;
D O I
10.1109/DeSE.2018.00021
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Wireless sensor networks have thrived over recent years, with conventional wireless sensor networks becoming an ever-growing area of research. However, underwater wireless sensor networks are underdeveloped in comparison with wireless sensor networks. This paper looks at several important considerations for wireless sensor networks and underwater sensor networking platform targeted at environmental monitoring. Many requirements are transferable from conventional wireless sensor networks and this paper looks at how these challenges have been tackled. However, considerations such as energy efficiency hold a greater weight where sensor nodes are more difficult to retrieve, consideration must also be given to other factors such as the impact of communication technologies, communication distances, data rates and ease of deployment.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 99
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Sensor Platforms for Multimodal Underwater Monitoring
    Kastner, Ryan
    Lin, Albert
    Schurgers, Curt
    Jaffe, Jules
    Franks, Peter
    Stewart, Brent S.
    2012 INTERNATIONAL GREEN COMPUTING CONFERENCE (IGCC), 2012,
  • [22] Free Space Optical Sensor Networking for Underwater Sensing Applications
    Agrawal, Navik
    Davis, Christopher C.
    Milner, Stuart D.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2009 FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT SENSORS, SENSOR NETWORKS AND INFORMATION PROCESSING, 2009, : 475 - 480
  • [23] Underwater acoustic sensor networking using passive phase conjugation
    Munir, Muhammad Farukh
    Xu, Hong
    Filali, Fethi
    2008 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMMUNICATIONS, PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1-13, 2008, : 2426 - +
  • [24] Free Space Optical Sensor Networking for Underwater Sensing Applications
    Agrawal, Navik
    Davis, Christopher C.
    Milner, Stuart D.
    2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT SENSORS, SENSOR NETWORKS AND INFORMATION PROCESSING (ISSNIP 2009), 2009, : 457 - +
  • [25] Environmental Monitoring Based on the Wireless Sensor Networking Technology: A Survey of Real-World Applications
    Karapistoli, Eirini
    Mampentzidou, Ioanna
    Economides, Anastasios A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2014, 5 (04) : 1 - 39
  • [26] A multi-platform sensor networking scheduling method
    Zhang Yunpu
    Duan Xiusheng
    Shan Ganlin
    Xu Gongguo
    2019 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED ELECTRONIC MATERIALS, COMPUTERS AND MATERIALS ENGINEERING (AEMCME 2019), 2019, 563
  • [27] Software-defined underwater acoustic networking platform and its applications
    Torres, Dustin
    Friedman, Jonathan
    Schmid, Thomas
    Srivastava, Mani B.
    Noh, Youngtae
    Gerla, Mario
    AD HOC NETWORKS, 2015, 34 : 252 - 264
  • [28] EMMNet: Sensor Networking for Electricity Meter Monitoring
    Lin, Zhi-Ting
    Zheng, Jie
    Ji, Yu-Sheng
    Zhao, Bao-Hua
    Qu, Yu-Gui
    Huang, Xu-Dong
    Jiang, Xiu-Fang
    SENSORS, 2010, 10 (07) : 6307 - 6323
  • [29] Remote Water Monitoring With Sensor Networking Technology
    Voigt, Thiemo
    Tsiftes, Nicolas
    He, Zhitao
    ERCIM NEWS, 2009, (76): : 39 - 40
  • [30] EVERUN - Enabling Power Consumption Monitoring in Underwater Networking Platforms
    Kazdaridis, Giannis
    Keranidis, Stratos
    Symeonidis, Polychronis
    Dias, Paulo Sousa
    Goncalves, Pedro
    Loureiro, Bruno
    Gjanci, Petrika
    Petrioli, Chiara
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 11TH WORKSHOP ON WIRELESS NETWORK TESTBEDS, EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION & CHARACTERIZATION (WINTECH '17), 2017, : 83 - 90