Non-symbolic division in childhood

被引:21
|
作者
McCrink, Koleen [1 ]
Spelke, Elizabeth S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ Barnard Coll, Dept Psychol, New York, NY 10027 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Dept Psychol, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Number; Division; Cognitive development; Operational momentum; Scaling; Approximate number system; APPROXIMATE NUMBER SYSTEM; OPERATIONAL MOMENTUM; YOUNG-CHILDREN; REPRESENTATION; DISCRIMINATION; MAGNITUDE; INFANTS; ABSTRACTION; PERFORMANCE; PERCEPTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jecp.2015.09.015
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
The approximate number system CANS) underlies representations of large numbers of objects as well as the additive, subtractive, and multiplicative relationships between them. In this set of studies, 5- and 6-year-old children were shown a series of video-based events that conveyed a transformation of a large number of objects into one-half or one-quarter of the original number. Children were able to estimate correctly the outcomes to these halving and quartering problems, and they based their responses on scaling by number, not on continuous quantities or guessing strategies. Children's performance exhibited the ratio signature of the ANS. Moreover, children performed above chance on relatively early trials, suggesting that this scaling operation is easily conveyed and readily performed. The results support the existence of a flexible and substantially untrained capacity to scale numerical amounts. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:66 / 82
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The influence of math anxiety on symbolic and non-symbolic magnitude processing
    Dietrich, Julia F.
    Huber, Stefan
    Moeller, Korbinian
    Klein, Elise
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 6
  • [22] Symbolic and non-symbolic number processing in children with developmental dyslexia
    Traff, Ulf
    Desoete, Annemie
    Passolunghi, Maria Chiara
    LEARNING AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2017, 56 : 105 - 111
  • [23] Early numerical development and the role of non-symbolic and symbolic skills
    Kolkman, Meijke E.
    Kroesbergen, Evelyn H.
    Leseman, Paul P. M.
    LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, 2013, 25 : 95 - 103
  • [24] Magnitude processing of symbolic and non-symbolic proportions: an fMRI study
    Julia Mock
    Stefan Huber
    Johannes Bloechle
    Julia F. Dietrich
    Julia Bahnmueller
    Johannes Rennig
    Elise Klein
    Korbinian Moeller
    Behavioral and Brain Functions, 14
  • [26] Symbolic and Non-Symbolic Representations of Number: All Mixed Up?
    Gregor, Courtney
    House, Jessica
    Zigler, Alan
    Penner-Wilger, Marcie
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE EXPERIMENTALE, 2012, 66 (04): : 305 - 305
  • [27] Evidence for distinct magnitude systems for symbolic and non-symbolic number
    Sasanguie, Delphine
    De Smedt, Bert
    Reynvoet, Bert
    PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 2017, 81 (01): : 231 - 242
  • [28] Spatial bias in symbolic and non-symbolic numerical comparison in neglect
    Masson, Nicolas
    Pesenti, Mauro
    Dormal, Valerie
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2013, 51 (10) : 1925 - 1932
  • [29] Evidence for distinct magnitude systems for symbolic and non-symbolic number
    Delphine Sasanguie
    Bert De Smedt
    Bert Reynvoet
    Psychological Research, 2017, 81 : 231 - 242
  • [30] Magnitude processing of symbolic and non-symbolic proportions: an fMRI study
    Mock, Julia
    Huber, Stefan
    Bloechle, Johannes
    Dietrich, Julia F.
    Bahnmueller, Julia
    Rennig, Johannes
    Klein, Elise
    Moeller, Korbinian
    BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN FUNCTIONS, 2018, 14