Luteal phase support using either Crinone® 8% or Utrogest®:: results of a prospective, randomized study

被引:39
|
作者
Ludwig, M
Schwartz, P
Babahan, B
Katalinic, A
Weiss, JM
Felberbaum, R
Al-Hasani, S
Diedrich, K
机构
[1] Med Univ Lubeck, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, D-23538 Lubeck, Germany
[2] Med Univ Lubeck, Dept Social Med, D-23552 Lubeck, Germany
[3] Med Univ Lubeck, Dept Canc Epidemiol, D-23552 Lubeck, Germany
关键词
Crinone (R); first uterine pass effect; luteal phase support; progesterone; Utrogest (R);
D O I
10.1016/S0301-2115(02)00010-6
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
The Crinone(R) 8% preparation makes it possible to administer natural progesterone (90 mg) vaginally once daily for luteal phase support (LPS). Until now, no prospective, randomized studies have directly compared this new preparation with widely used Utrogest(R) capsules, which were originally designed for oral administration but are used routinely as a vaginal preparation. A prospective, randomized study investigated 126 patients undergoing cycles of in vitro fertilization (IVF) and IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Patients received either Crinone(R) 8% (n = 73) vaginally once daily or two Utrogest(R) capsules (n = 53) vaginally three times daily (600 mg). Clinical pregnancy rates were comparable (28.8 versus 18.9%), as were clinical abortion rates until 12 weeks of gestation (14.3 versus 10.0%) and clinical ongoing pregnancy rates (24.7 versus 17.0%) in the Crinone(R) 8% and Utrogest(R) groups, respectively. Forty-seven non-pregnant patients were randomly selected to answer questions regarding comfort during LIPS. Crinone(R) 8% had a clear advantage over Utrogest(R) as it resulted in less vaginal discharge (P < 0.01) and fewer application difficulties (P < 0.05). Twenty patients familiar with the alternative preparation from a previous cycle also noted that Crinone(R) 8% was easier to apply (P < 0.01) and less time consuming (P < 0.05) to use than Utrogest(R). (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:48 / 52
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] COMPARISON OF THE EFFICACY OF TWO VAGINAL PROGESTERONE FORMULATIONS, CRINONE 8% GEL AND UTROGESTAN CAPSULES, USED FOR LUTEAL SUPPORT IN BLASTOCYST STAGE EMBRYO TRANSFERS
    Wang, Li-Jung
    Huang, Fu-Jen
    Kung, Fu-Tsai
    Lin, Pin -Yao
    Chang, Shiuh Young
    Lan, Kuo-Chung
    TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 48 (04): : 375 - 379
  • [42] The effect of adding oral oestradiol to progesterone as luteal phase support in ART cycles - a randomized controlled study
    Moini, Ashraf
    Modarress, Shahrzad Zadeh
    Amirchaghmaghi, Elham
    Mirghavam, Naeimeh
    Khafri, Soraya
    Akhoond, Mohammad Reza
    Yazdi, Reza Salman
    ARCHIVES OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2011, 7 (01) : 112 - 116
  • [43] Vaginal progesterone gel is non-inferior to intramuscular progesterone in efficacy with acceptable tolerability for luteal phase support: A prospective, randomized, multicenter study in China
    Chi, Hongbin
    Li, Rong
    Qiao, Jie
    Chen, Xiujuan
    Wang, Xingling
    Hao, Guimin
    Wu, Qiongfang
    Cao, Yunxia
    Cai, Liyi
    Ye, Hong
    Zhu, Yimin
    Wang, Shuyu
    Zhang, Xuehong
    Zhang, Cuilian
    Zhang, Yunshan
    Lv, Qun
    Sun, Yingpu
    Li, Hong
    Huang, Xuefeng
    Wang, Fang
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2019, 237 : 100 - 105
  • [44] Luteal phase support with 17α-hyduoxyprogesterone versus unsupported cycles in in vitro fertilization:: A comparative randomized study
    Abate, A
    Brigandi, A
    Abate, FG
    Manti, F
    Unfer, V
    Perino, M
    GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION, 1999, 48 (02) : 78 - 80
  • [45] Luteal phase support in in vitro fertilization:: Meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Nosarka, S
    Kruger, T
    Siebert, I
    Grové, D
    GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION, 2005, 60 (02) : 67 - 74
  • [46] Luteal phase support in infertility treatment: a meta-analysis of the randomized trials
    Pritts, EA
    Atwood, AK
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2002, 17 (09) : 2287 - 2299
  • [47] PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF HUMAN CHORIONIC-GONADOTROPIN VERSUS INTRAMUSCULAR PROGESTERONE FOR LUTEAL-PHASE SUPPORT IN ASSISTED REPRODUCTION
    ARAUJO, E
    BERNARDINI, L
    FREDERICK, JL
    ASCH, RH
    BALMACEDA, JP
    JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 1994, 11 (02) : 74 - 78
  • [48] THE ROLE OF LUTEAL-PHASE SUPPORT IN INFERTILITY TREATMENT - A METAANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED TRIALS
    SOLIMAN, S
    DAYA, S
    COLLINS, J
    HUGHES, EG
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1994, 61 (06) : 1068 - 1076
  • [49] Luteal Phase Support Using Subcutaneous Progesterone: A Systematic Review
    Conforti, Alessandro
    Carbone, Luigi
    Iorio, Giuseppe Gabriele
    Cariati, Federica
    Bagnulo, Francesca
    Marrone, Vincenzo
    Strina, Ida
    Alviggi, Carlo
    FRONTIERS IN REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2021, 3
  • [50] Oral progestogen versus intramuscular progesterone for luteal support after assisted reproductive technology treatment: a prospective randomized study
    Iwase, Akira
    Ando, Hisao
    Toda, Shigeru
    Ishimatsu, Shino
    Harata, Toko
    Kurotsuchi, Shozo
    Shimomura, Yuji
    Goto, Maki
    Kikkawa, Fumitaka
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2008, 277 (04) : 319 - 324