Luteal phase support using either Crinone® 8% or Utrogest®:: results of a prospective, randomized study

被引:39
|
作者
Ludwig, M
Schwartz, P
Babahan, B
Katalinic, A
Weiss, JM
Felberbaum, R
Al-Hasani, S
Diedrich, K
机构
[1] Med Univ Lubeck, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, D-23538 Lubeck, Germany
[2] Med Univ Lubeck, Dept Social Med, D-23552 Lubeck, Germany
[3] Med Univ Lubeck, Dept Canc Epidemiol, D-23552 Lubeck, Germany
关键词
Crinone (R); first uterine pass effect; luteal phase support; progesterone; Utrogest (R);
D O I
10.1016/S0301-2115(02)00010-6
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
The Crinone(R) 8% preparation makes it possible to administer natural progesterone (90 mg) vaginally once daily for luteal phase support (LPS). Until now, no prospective, randomized studies have directly compared this new preparation with widely used Utrogest(R) capsules, which were originally designed for oral administration but are used routinely as a vaginal preparation. A prospective, randomized study investigated 126 patients undergoing cycles of in vitro fertilization (IVF) and IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Patients received either Crinone(R) 8% (n = 73) vaginally once daily or two Utrogest(R) capsules (n = 53) vaginally three times daily (600 mg). Clinical pregnancy rates were comparable (28.8 versus 18.9%), as were clinical abortion rates until 12 weeks of gestation (14.3 versus 10.0%) and clinical ongoing pregnancy rates (24.7 versus 17.0%) in the Crinone(R) 8% and Utrogest(R) groups, respectively. Forty-seven non-pregnant patients were randomly selected to answer questions regarding comfort during LIPS. Crinone(R) 8% had a clear advantage over Utrogest(R) as it resulted in less vaginal discharge (P < 0.01) and fewer application difficulties (P < 0.05). Twenty patients familiar with the alternative preparation from a previous cycle also noted that Crinone(R) 8% was easier to apply (P < 0.01) and less time consuming (P < 0.05) to use than Utrogest(R). (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:48 / 52
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Luteal phase support using either progesterone gel (Crinone 8%®) or progesterone suppositories (Utrogest®):: results of a prospective, randomised study
    Schwartz, P
    Ludwig, M
    Babahan, B
    Katalinic, A
    Bals-Pratsch, M
    Felberbaum, RE
    Al-Hasani, S
    Diedrich, K
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2000, 15 : 43 - 44
  • [2] Prospective, randomized study to evaluate the pregnancy rate using HCG, vaginal progesterone (Utrogest®), or a combination of both for luteal-phase support:: preliminary results
    Ludwig, M
    Finas, A
    Bals-Pratsch, M
    Felberbaum, RE
    Schöpper, B
    Al-Hasani, S
    Diedrich, K
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1999, 14 : 2 - 3
  • [3] Efficacy and tolerability of vaginal progesterone capsules (Utrogest™ 200) compared with progesterone gel (Crinone™ 8%) for luteal phase support during assisted reproduction
    Kleinstein, J
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2005, 83 (06) : 1641 - 1649
  • [4] Vaginal use of micronized progesterone for luteal support. A randomized study comparing Utrogestan® and Crinone® 8%
    Michnova, Lucie
    Dostal, Jiri
    Kudela, Milan
    Hamal, Petr
    Langova, Katerina
    BIOMEDICAL PAPERS-OLOMOUC, 2017, 161 (01): : 86 - 91
  • [5] Luteal phase support with progesterone in intrauterine insemination: a prospective randomized study
    Romero Nieto, Maria Inmaculada
    Lorente Gonzalez, Juan
    Eduardo Arjona-Berral, Jose
    del Munoz-Villanueva, Maria
    Castelo-Branco, Camil
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2014, 30 (03) : 197 - 201
  • [7] Crinone Gel for Luteal Phase Support in Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer Cycles: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial in the Chinese Population
    Wang, Yang
    He, Yaqiong
    Zhao, Xiaoming
    Ji, Xiaowei
    Hong, Yan
    Wang, Yuan
    Zhu, Qinling
    Xu, Bin
    Sun, Yun
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (07):
  • [8] Vaginal (Crinone 8%) gel vs. intramuscular progesterone in oil for luteal phase support in in vitro fertilization: a large prospective trial
    Silverberg, Kaylen M.
    Vaughn, Thomas C.
    Hansard, Lisa J.
    Burger, Natalie Z.
    Minter, Tamara
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2012, 97 (02) : 344 - 348
  • [9] EFFECT OF LUTEAL PHASE SUPPORT IN INTRAUTERINE INSEMINATION CYCLES: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY.
    An, S. J.
    Jung, J. Y.
    Kwon, H. C.
    Kim, H. M.
    Han, J. H.
    Lee, S. J.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2010, 94 (04) : S176 - S177
  • [10] Comparison of Crinone 8% intravaginal gel and intramuscular progesterone for luteal support in in vitro fertilization
    Chang, Sheng-Ping
    JOURNAL OF THE CHINESE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2008, 71 (08) : 381 - 385