Analysis of design options for the electricity market: The German case

被引:61
|
作者
Keles, Dogan [1 ]
Bublitz, Andreas [1 ]
Zimmermann, Florian [1 ]
Genoese, Massimo [1 ]
Fichtner, Wolf [1 ]
机构
[1] Karlsruhe Inst Technol, Chair Energy Econ, Hertzstr 16, D-76187 Karlsruhe, Germany
关键词
Electricity market design; Energy-only market; Generation adequacy; Strategic reserve; Capacity market; Agent-based simulation; GENERATION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.08.189
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The effectiveness of the energy-only market (EOM) in providing sufficient incentives for investments is intensively discussed in Europe. While supporters claim that an improved EOM can guarantee generation adequacy, energy suppliers in particular favor the introduction of a capacity market to finance power plant investments. However, there is a lack of quantitative assessment of market design options taking into account individual decisions of market players. Existing studies mainly include a system view based on a central planner optimization. This paper on the other hand is based on an agent-based simulation model for the German electricity market. This method can explicitly incorporate individual investment decisions and aggregate them to present a holistic view of the system. Our results show that an EOM extended with a strategic reserve can incentivize investments, and guarantee supply security in a market with high share of renewable energies. However, the generation adequacy can be more easily achieved with a capacity market. Furthermore, the cost advantage of an EOM diminishes in the long-term, as scarcity prices in the EOM lead to similar system costs as with a capacity market. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:884 / 901
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Outsourcing Electricity Market Design
    Macey, Joshua C.
    UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LAW REVIEW, 2024, 91 (05): : 1243 - 1330
  • [22] Nonconvex Electricity Market Design
    O'Neill, Richard P.
    2009 IEEE POWER & ENERGY SOCIETY GENERAL MEETING, VOLS 1-8, 2009, : 40 - 46
  • [23] A nice electricity market design
    Woo C.K.
    Zarnikau J.
    Electricity Journal, 2019, 32 (09):
  • [24] Wind power trading options in competitive electricity market
    Singh, S. N.
    Erlich, I.
    2006 POWER ENGINEERING SOCIETY GENERAL MEETING, VOLS 1-9, 2006, : 2758 - +
  • [25] The application of real options as a tool for decisionmaking in the electricity market
    Arango Arango, Monica Andrea
    Botero, Sergio Botero
    2017 12TH IBERIAN CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES (CISTI), 2017,
  • [26] Entry into the electricity market: Uncertainty, competition, and mothballing options
    Takashima, Ryuta
    Goto, Makoto
    Kimura, Hiroshi
    Madarame, Haruki
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2008, 30 (04) : 1809 - 1830
  • [27] Analysis of the German Continuous Intraday Market and the Revenue Potential for Flexibility Options
    Rominger, Julian
    Loesch, Manuel
    Steuer, Sebastian
    Koeper, Katrin
    Schmeck, Hartmut
    2019 16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THE EUROPEAN ENERGY MARKET (EEM), 2019,
  • [28] The Model of Chinese Provincial Electricity Market Design and Simulation Analysis
    Cai, Hui
    Zhou, Long
    Liu, Dunnan
    2015 2ND ASIAN PACIFIC CONFERENCE ON ENERGY, ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT (APEESD 2015), 2015, : 511 - 515
  • [29] Industrial consumers’ electricity market participation options: a case study of an industrial cooling process in Denmark
    Fatras N.
    Ma Z.
    Jørgensen B.N.
    Energy Informatics, 2021, 4 (Suppl 2)
  • [30] Testing Alternative Electricity Market Design Performances: Methodology and Case Study
    Suski, Adam
    Chattopadhyay, Debabrata
    Nicolas, Claire
    IEEE Transactions on Energy Markets, Policy and Regulation, 2024, 2 (03): : 407 - 422