Can the Energy-Consumption Permit Trading Scheme Curb SO2 Emissions? Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment in China

被引:4
|
作者
Liu, Mengyao [1 ]
Jiang, Hongli [1 ]
机构
[1] Jiangsu Univ, Sch Finance & Econ, Zhenjiang 212013, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
energy-consumption permit trading scheme (ECPT); SO2; emissions; DID method; energy consumption structure; technological innovation; SULFUR-DIOXIDE EMISSIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL-REGULATION; POLLUTION; IMPACTS; DECOMPOSITION; TECHNOLOGY; EFFICIENCY; POLICIES; QUALITY;
D O I
10.3390/su142416935
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Energy and environmental pollution are major global challenges. This paper aims to examine the impact of China's energy-consumption permit trading scheme (ECPT) on environmental pollution and the influence mechanisms. The study constructs provincial panel data for China from 2006 to 2020 and uses the difference-in-difference (DID) method to investigate the issue. Our results demonstrate that ECPT significantly curbs SO2 emissions, as confirmed by a series of statistical robustness tests. Specifically, the ECPT has significantly reduced SO2 by approximately 30.4%. Furthermore, the ECPT reduces SO2 emissions mainly by optimizing the structure of energy consumption and promoting technological innovation. In addition, the impact of the ECPT on SO2 emissions is more pronounced in the central and western provinces of China, and in provinces with lower levels of industrial structure and high environmental regulation intensity. This study provides a perspective from a developing country and makes an important contribution to the existing research by exploring the curbing effect of energy policy on SO2 emissions.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Emissions trading in China: lessons from Taiyuan SO2 emissions trading program
    Lu, Zhen
    SUSTAINABILITY ACCOUNTING MANAGEMENT AND POLICY JOURNAL, 2011, 2 (01) : 27 - 44
  • [42] The impact of energy use rights trading policy on industrial companies' ' green investments - Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China
    Li, Jiaxin
    Guo, Yiwei
    ENERGY REPORTS, 2024, 12 : 329 - 340
  • [43] DOES CO2 EMISSIONS TRADING DUCE CO2 EMISSION INTENSITY? EVIDENCE FROM A QUASI-NATURAL EXPERIMENT
    Zheng, Rui
    Liang, Jinjin
    FRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETIN, 2020, 29 (09): : 7668 - 7679
  • [44] Does carbon emission trading scheme inhibit corporate executives' pursuit of excess compensation? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China
    Zhang, Zhao
    Zhang, Feipeng
    Ma, Caoyuan
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2024, 139
  • [45] Can environmental tax improve the environmental investment? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China
    Guo, Bingnan
    Feng, Weizhe
    Yu, Yisha
    Zhang, Hao
    Hu, Feng
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (53) : 113846 - 113858
  • [46] Can digital infrastructure improve corporate productivity? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China
    Meng, Shunjie
    Xu, Xiaoxin
    ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND POLICY, 2025, 85 : 1867 - 1884
  • [47] Can environmental tax improve the environmental investment? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China
    Bingnan Guo
    Weizhe Feng
    Yisha Yu
    Hao Zhang
    Feng Hu
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30 : 113846 - 113858
  • [48] Can Industrial Relocation Reduce Air Pollution? Evidence From a Quasi-Natural Experiment in China
    Ge, Tao
    Lv, Xuchen
    Ma, Li
    Shen, Xiaoyan
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2022, 10
  • [49] Can the new energy demonstration city policy reduce environmental pollution? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China
    Yang, Xiaodong
    Zhang, Jinning
    Ren, Siyu
    Ran, Qiying
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 287
  • [50] The deterrent effect of environmental judicature on firms' pollution emissions: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China
    Zhou, Peng
    Huang, Xiaoqi
    Song, Frank M.
    CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2024, 88