Evidence that Tenecteplase Is Noninferior to Alteplase for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Meta-Analysis of 5 Randomized Trials

被引:166
|
作者
Burgos, Adrian M. [1 ,2 ]
Saver, Jeffrey L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] UCLA, Geffen Sch Med, Comprehens Stroke Ctr, 710 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] UCLA, Geffen Sch Med, Dept Neurol, 710 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
关键词
fibrinolytic agent; half-life; myocardial infarction; tissue-type plasminogen activator; tenecteplase; THERAPY; THROMBOLYSIS;
D O I
10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025080
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Purpose- TNK (tenecteplase), a newer fibrinolytic agent, has practical delivery advantages over ALT (alteplase) that would make it a useful agent if noninferior in acute ischemic stroke treatment outcome. Accordingly, the most recent US American Heart Association/American Stroke Association acute ischemic stroke guideline recognized TNK as an alternative to ALT, but only based on informal consideration, rather than formal meta-analysis, of completed randomized control trials. Methods- Systematic literature search and formal meta-analysis were conducted per PRISMA guidelines (Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta-Analyses), adapted to noninferiority analysis. The primary outcome of freedom from disability (modified Rankin Scale score, 0-1) outcome at 3 m, and additional efficacy and safety outcomes, were analyzed. Results- Systematic search identified 5 trials enrolling 1585 patients (828 TNK, 757 ALT). Across all trials, mean age was 70.8, 58.5% male, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale mean 7.0, and time from last known well to treatment start mean 148 minutes. All ALT patients received standard 0.9 mg/kg dosing, while TNK dosing was 0.1 mg/kg in 6.8%, 0.25 mg/kg in 24.6%, and 0.4 mg/kg in 68.6%. For the primary end point, crude cumulative rates of disability-free (modified Rankin Scale score, 0-1) 3 m outcome were TNK 57.9% versus ALT 55.4%. Informal, random-effects meta-analysis, the risk difference was 4% (95% CI, -1% to 8%). The lower 95% CI bound fell well within the prespecified noninferiority margin. Similar results were seen for the additional efficacy end points: functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score, 0-2): crude TNK 71.9% versus ALT 70.5%, risk difference 2% (95% CI, -3% to 6%); and modified Rankin Scale shift analysis, common odds ratio 1.21 (95% CI, 0.93-1.57). For safety end points, lower event rates reduced power, but point estimates were also consistent with noninferiority Conclusions- Accumulated clinical trial data provides strong evidence that TNK is noninferior to ALT in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. These findings provide formal support for the recent guideline recommendation to consider TNK an alternative to ALT.
引用
收藏
页码:2156 / 2162
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Tenecteplase vs. Alteplase for Intravenous Thrombolytic Therapy of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Ziyi Shen
    Nana Bao
    Ming Tang
    Yang Yang
    Jia Li
    Wei Liu
    Guohui Jiang
    Neurology and Therapy, 2023, 12 : 1553 - 1572
  • [42] The efficacy and safety of intravenous thrombolysis with tenecteplase versus alteplase for acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Heng Wei
    Bin Fu
    Chao Yang
    Ming Huang
    Neurological Sciences, 2023, 44 : 3005 - 3015
  • [43] Ethnic Differences in the Safety and Efficacy of Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Koh, Jin Hean
    Lim, Claire Yi Jia
    Tan, Lucas Tze Peng
    Sia, Ching-Hui
    Poh, Kian Keong
    Sharma, Vijay Kumar
    Yeo, Leonard Leong Litt
    Ho, Andrew Fu Wah
    Wu, Teddy
    Kong, William Kok-Fai
    Tan, Benjamin Yong Qiang
    JOURNAL OF STROKE, 2024, 26 (03)
  • [44] Safety and efficacy of tenecteplase versus alteplase in acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Guiltermini, Alexandre
    Yanl, David Jun
    Perrier, Arnaud
    Marti, Christophe
    ARCHIVES OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2016, 12 (06) : 1181 - 1187
  • [45] TENECTEPLASE OR ALTEPLASE FOR ACUTE ISCHEMIC STROKE? A COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS
    Nguyen, C.
    Lahr, M. M. H.
    Van der Zee, D. J.
    Van Voorst, H.
    Roos, Y. B. W. E. M.
    Uyttenboogaart, M.
    Buskens, E.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (12) : S167 - S167
  • [46] Electroacupuncture for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Liu, Ai-Ju
    Li, Ji-Huang
    Li, Hui-Qin
    Fu, Deng-Lei
    Lu, Lin
    Bian, Zhao-Xiang
    Zheng, Guo-Qing
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CHINESE MEDICINE, 2015, 43 (08): : 1541 - 1566
  • [47] Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials
    Elgendy, Islam Y.
    Kumbhani, Dharam J.
    Mahmoud, Ahmed
    Bhatt, Deepak L.
    Bavry, Anthony A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 66 (22) : 2498 - 2505
  • [48] DESMOTEPLASE FOR ACUTE ISCHEMIC STROKE: A META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS
    Almraezy, A. G.
    Elnenny, M.
    Ahmed, H.
    Negida, A.
    THROMBOSIS RESEARCH, 2016, 141 : S9 - S9
  • [49] TENECTEPLASE VERSUS ALTEPLASE FOR THE TREATMENT OF ACUTE ISCHEMIC STROKE
    Nakajima, Steven
    Smith, Raymond
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2023, 51 (01) : 267 - 267
  • [50] Tenecteplase versus Alteplase for Acute Ischemic Stroke REPLY
    Parsons, Mark
    Levi, Christopher
    Davis, Stephen
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2012, 367 (03): : 276 - 276