The impact of transaction costs and institutional pressure on supplier environmental practices

被引:38
|
作者
Tate, Wendy L. [1 ]
Ellram, Lisa M. [2 ]
Dooley, Kevin J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee, Dept Mkt & Supply Chain Management, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
[2] Miami Univ, Dept Mkt, Farmer Sch Business, Oxford, OH 45056 USA
[3] Arizona State Univ, WP Carey Sch Business, Tempe, AZ USA
关键词
Institutional theory; Environmental; Purchasing; Transaction cost theory; CHAIN MANAGEMENT; PERFORMANCE; FRAMEWORK; DRIVERS; OPERATIONS; DIFFUSION; ECONOMICS; ADOPTION;
D O I
10.1108/IJPDLM-12-2012-0356
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose - Suppliers play a more significant role in the environmental footprint of supply chains than most final manufacturers. The purpose of this paper is to apply transaction costs and institutional theory to help understand why the more conservative, or reactive suppliers may or may not be likely to adopt environmental practices. Design/methodology/approach - This research builds on a prior conceptual paper and uses the results of a survey to test whether transaction costs and institutional theory can provide insight into supplier's adoption of environmental practices. Findings - This research finds that perceived transaction costs affect supplier cooperation in adopting environmental practices. Suppliers are more likely to adopt an environmental practice if information-seeking costs are low or the cost of adoption is considered necessary to maintain the relationship. Data did not support the hypotheses concerning institutional pressures. Originality/value - There is much research in the area of proactive adoption of environmental business practices. This research looks specifically at what influences the adoption of environmental business practices by suppliers that are more reactive or hesitant to be leaders in this area.
引用
收藏
页码:353 / 372
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] TRANSACTION COSTS AND THEIR IMPACT ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE FISHERIES CLUSTER
    Stepanova, T. E.
    Polyakov, R. K.
    GCPMED 2018 - INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE GLOBAL CHALLENGES AND PROSPECTS OF THE MODERN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 57 : 497 - 512
  • [32] The Political Transaction Costs and Uncertainties of Establishing Environmental Rights
    Krutilla, Kerry
    Alexeev, Alexander
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 107 : 299 - 309
  • [33] Transaction costs, economic instruments, and environmental policies.
    Weersink, A
    Herath, D
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1999, 81 (05) : 1313 - 1313
  • [34] Addressing Global Environmental Externalities: Transaction Costs Considerations
    Libecap, Gary D.
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE, 2014, 52 (02) : 424 - 479
  • [35] Improving environmental decisions: A transaction-costs story
    Pannell, David J.
    Roberts, Anna M.
    Park, Geoff
    Alexander, Jennifer
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2013, 88 : 244 - 252
  • [36] Modeling transaction costs in household adoption of landscape conservation practices
    Johnston, Robert J.
    Ndebele, Tom
    Newburn, David A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2023, 105 (01) : 341 - 367
  • [37] HUMANITARIAN SUPPLY CHAIN IN THE VIEW OF NEW INSTITUTIONAL ECONOMICS: TRANSACTION COSTS
    Marcinkowski, Jakub Mateusz
    8TH CARPATHIAN LOGISTICS CONGRESS (CLC 2018), 2019, : 639 - 645
  • [38] Information technology, transaction costs and governance structures: integrating an institutional approach
    Islamoglu, Mehmet
    Liebenau, Jonathan
    JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 22 (03) : 275 - 283
  • [39] The performance of water markets: Transaction costs, interjurisdictional barriers and institutional options
    Easter, KW
    Dinar, A
    Rosegrant, M
    CONFLICT AND COOPERATION ON TRANS-BOUNDARY WATER RESOURCES, 1998, : 299 - 313
  • [40] Transaction costs and institutional trading in small-cap equity funds
    Comerton-Forde, Carole
    Gallagher, David R.
    Nahhas, Jumana
    Walter, Terry S.
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2010, 35 (03) : 313 - 327