THE PROMOTION OF SOCIAL EFFICIENCY MEASURES THROUGH CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY POLICIES AND THEIR INFLUENCE ON APPAREL PURCHASE BEHAVIOUR

被引:0
|
作者
Iwanow, Heather [1 ]
机构
[1] Manchester Metropolitan Univ, Hollings Fac, Dept Clothing Design & Technol, Manchester M15 6BH, Lancs, England
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The apparel sector in the United Kingdom (UK) has seen sales growth in both the upper and lower price levels of fashion, and a contraction in the middle market. However, experts predict that, with concern about externalities created by production and consumption growing, consumers will increasingly look for more than a value proposition to determine their apparel purchases. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) policies published by fashion brands have traditionally concentrated on employment practices. However, with pollution created by global sourcing strategies being highlighted, including the effects of fibre production, material and garment manufacture, packaging, transportation and the disposal of used garments, brands are increasingly reflecting environmental concerns in their CSR policy documents. Applying the tricomponent attitude model, this research investigates whether social efficiency measures and externalities identified by CSR documents affect purchase behaviour in the apparel sector. Utilising a quantitative methodology, undertaken with a sample aged 18-26, the research found that CSR issues are not currently a motivating factor for this segment, where short-term individual needs of style, fit and price take precedence over long-term sustainability considerations. This paper explores apparel retailers' use of CSR documents, which contain social efficiency measures designed to address externalities created by production and consumption, and their influence on consumption in the UK apparel sector.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Government Subsidy Policies and Corporate Social Responsibility
    Wang, Wenlong
    Zhang, Suxian
    Zhang, Longlong
    Liu, Qi
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 112814 - 112826
  • [22] Psychosocial effect of Corporate Social Responsibility policies
    Yepes-Baldo, Montserrat
    Romeo, Marina
    Javier Perez, Francisco
    Boria, Sefa
    Barbancho, Fernando
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 51 : 785 - 785
  • [23] The impact of corporate social responsibility expectations on purchase intention of social enterprise products
    Ng, Mark
    SOCIAL ENTERPRISE JOURNAL, 2022, 18 (04) : 585 - 604
  • [24] Corporate social responsibility and market efficiency: Evidence from ESG and misvaluation measures *
    Bofinger, Yannik
    Heyden, Kim J.
    Rock, Bjoern
    JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2022, 134
  • [25] Corporate Social Responsibility, Corporate Governance and Investment Efficiency
    Huang, Zhilan
    Zhao, Xine
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE AND INNOVATIVE EDUCATION (MSIE), 2016, 60 : 440 - 443
  • [26] The effect of corporate social responsibility transparency on corporate payout policies
    Hendijani Zadeh, Mohammad
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGERIAL FINANCE, 2021, 17 (05) : 708 - 732
  • [27] Implementing corporate social responsibility through social partnerships
    Walters, Geoff
    Anagnostopoulos, Christos
    BUSINESS ETHICS-A EUROPEAN REVIEW, 2012, 21 (04) : 417 - 433
  • [28] Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility on Purchase Intention in Hotel Industry: The Mediating Role of Attitude
    Saut, Moeun
    Song, Sreyneth
    JOURNAL OF QUALITY ASSURANCE IN HOSPITALITY & TOURISM, 2025,
  • [29] The Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility on Consumer Purchase Intention toward Environmentally Friendly Sneakers
    Huang, Wen-Shin
    Lee, Cheng-Jhen
    Chen, Han-Shen
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (21)
  • [30] The Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility on Consumer Purchase Intention: The Mediating Role of Consumer Engagement via Social Media
    Al-Haddad, Shafig
    Sharabati, Abdel-Aziz Ahmad
    Al-Khasawneh, Mohammad
    Maraqa, Rand
    Hashem, Raya
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (11)