Prostate cancer detection using multiparametric 3-tesla MRI and fusion biopsy: preliminary results

被引:5
|
作者
Mussi, Thais Caldara [1 ]
Garcia, Rodrigo Gobbo [2 ]
Gomes de Queiroz, Marcos Roberto [2 ]
Lemos, Gustavo Caserta [3 ]
Baroni, Ronaldo Hueb [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Israelita Albert Einstein, Dept Radiol & Diagnost Imagem, Av Albert Einstein 627, BR-05651901 Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[2] Hosp Israelita Albert Einstein, Dept Intervencao Guiada Imagem, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[3] Hosp Israelita Albert Einstein, Dept Urol, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
来源
INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL | 2016年 / 42卷 / 05期
关键词
Prostatic Neoplasms; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Biopsy; Prostate; RESONANCE; ANTIGEN; LOCALIZATION;
D O I
10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0204
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of transrectal ultrasonography (US) biopsy with imaging fusion using multiparametric (mp) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with suspicion of prostate cancer (PCa), with an emphasis on clinically significant tumors according to histological criteria. Materials and Methods: A total of 189 consecutive US/MRI fusion biopsies were performed obtaining systematic and guided samples of suspicious areas on mpMRI using a 3 Tesla magnet without endorectal coil. Clinical significance for prostate cancer was established based on Epstein criteria. Results: In our casuistic, the average Gleason score was 7 and the average PSA was 5.0ng/mL. Of the 189 patients that received US/MRI biopsies, 110 (58.2%) were positive for PCa. Of those cases, 88 (80%)were clinically significant, accounting for 46.6% of all patients. We divided the MRI findings into 5 Likert scales of probability of having clinically significant PCa. The positivity of US/MRI biopsy for clinically significant PCa was 0%, 17.6% 23.5%, 53.4% and 84.4% for Likert scores 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in terms of biopsy results between different levels of suspicion on mpMRI and also when biopsy results were divided into groups of clinically non-significant versus clinically significant between different levels of suspicion on mpMRI (p-value <0.05 in both analyzes). Conclusion: We found that there is a significant difference in cancer detection using US/MRI fusion biopsy between low-probability and intermediate/high probability Likert scores using mpMRI.
引用
收藏
页码:897 / 905
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Variability in prostate cancer detection among radiologists and urologists using MRI fusion biopsy
    Patel, Hiten D.
    Halgrimson, Whitney R.
    Sweigert, Sarah E.
    Shea, Steven M.
    Turk, Thomas M. T.
    Quek, Marcus L.
    Gorbonos, Alex
    Flanigan, Robert C.
    Goldberg, Ari
    Gupta, Gopal N.
    BJUI COMPASS, 2024, 5 (02): : 304 - 312
  • [42] Multiparametric MRI Versus Multiparametric US in the Detection of Prostate Cancer
    Drudi, Francesco M.
    Cantisani, Vito
    Angelini, Flavia
    Ciccariello, Mauro
    Messineo, Daniela
    Ettorre, Evaristo
    Liberatore, Mauro
    Scialpi, Michele
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2019, 39 (06) : 3101 - 3110
  • [43] Multiparametric MRI/TRUS Fusion Prostate Biopsy: Advantages of a Transperineal Approach
    Pepe, Pietro
    Garufi, Antonio
    Priolo, Gian Domenico
    Pennisi, Michele
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 37 (06) : 3291 - 3294
  • [44] Sensing the Effects of Mouth Breathing by Using 3-Tesla MRI
    Park, Chan-A
    Kang, Chang-Ki
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY, 2017, 70 (12) : 1070 - 1076
  • [45] MULTIPARAMETRIC MRI AND FUSION BIOPSY DECREASES DETECTION OF INDOLENT CANCER IN AFRICAN AMERICAN MEN
    Kongnyuy, Michael
    George, Arvin
    Siddiqui, Minhaj
    Muthigi, Akhil
    Kadakia, Meet
    Sidana, Abhinav
    Kilchevsky, Amichai
    Frye, Thomas
    Fascelli, Michele
    Mertan, Francesca
    Su, Daniel
    Merino, Maria
    Turkbey, Baris
    Choyke, Peter
    Wood, Bradford
    Pinto, Peter
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (04): : E94 - E94
  • [46] Multiparametric MRI and targeted prostate biopsy: Improvements in cancer detection, localization, and risk assessment
    Bjurlin, Marc A.
    Mendhiratta, Neil
    Wysock, James S.
    Taneja, Samir S.
    CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (01) : 9 - 18
  • [47] Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer
    Boesen, Lars
    DANISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 64 (02):
  • [48] MULTIPARAMETRIC PROSTATE MRI AND MRI/ULTRASOUND FUSION BIOPSY IN THE FOLLOW-UP OF PROSTATE CANCER PROGRESSION FOR MEN ON ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE
    Walton-Diaz, Annerleim
    Shakir, Nabeel
    Rais-Bahrami, Soroush
    Turkbey, Baris
    Rothwax, Jason
    George, Arvin
    Siddiqui, Minhaj
    Okoro, Chinonyerem
    Raskolnikov, Dima
    Hong, William Cheng
    Su, Daniel
    Stamatakis, Lambros
    Han, Hui
    Simon, Richard
    Wood, Bradford
    Choyke, Peter
    Pinto, Peter
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 191 (04): : E346 - E347
  • [49] Implementing Multiparametric MRI and MRI/Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Biopsy To Detect Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
    Dillard, Melissa
    Lai, Win Shun
    Thomas, John
    Nix, Jeffrey
    Rais-Bahrami, Soroush
    Gordetsky, Jennifer
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2015, 28 : 216A - 216A
  • [50] Multifocality and Detectability of Prostate Cancer with 3-Tesla Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Correlation with Radical Prostatectomy Mapping Histopathology
    Karadag, Serdar
    Ozlu, Deniz Noyan
    Haciislamoglu, Ahmet
    Yildiz, Omer
    Baytekin, Halil Firat
    Eksi, Mithat
    Polat, Hakan
    Bitkin, Alper
    Tasci, Ali Ihsan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2024, 2024