The neglected morula/compact stage embryo transfer

被引:72
|
作者
Tao, J
Tamis, R
Fink, K
Williams, B
Nelson-White, T
Craig, R
机构
[1] Fertil Treatment Ctr, Chandler, AZ 85224 USA
[2] Arizona Inst Reprod Med, Phoenix, AZ USA
关键词
compact; embryo grading; implantation; morula; selection;
D O I
10.1093/humrep/17.6.1513
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: This retrospective study analysed the outcomes of 339 embryo transfers on either day 3 (n = 97) or day 4 (n = 242), and proposed a grading system for morula/compact embryos. METHODS: The morula/compact embryo grading was based on: (i) the proportion of blastomeres undergoing the compaction process; (ii) the morphology of the compacted multicellular mass; (iii) the embryo quality on day 2 and 3; and (iv) the amount of fragmentation. Embryo transfers were classified into groups as follows: group I: transferred with zero `good' embryos; group II: one `good' embryo; group III: two or more `good' embryos. RESULTS: Patients on day 4 were transferred with significantly fewer embryos in groups II and III (2.58 +/- 0.9 and 2.35 +/- 0.6 respectively) when compared with the correspondent day 3 transfers (3.81 +/- 1.4 and 4.07 +/- 0.9 respectively) (P < 0.05), but had the same or higher implantation and pregnancy rates. Analysing the patients who had transfers with all `good' embryos, day 4 transfer achieved a significantly higher implantation rate compared with day 3 transfer (46.4 versus 21.4%, P < 0.01), but the number of embryos transferred on day 4 was significantly lower than day 3 (2.1 +/- 0.5 versus 3.5 +/- 0.9, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The morula/compact embryos had great value for embryo selection, which significantly reduced the number of embryos needed for transfer.
引用
收藏
页码:1513 / 1518
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Clinical outcomes of day 5 morula transfer are acceptable when no blastocysts are available after prolonged embryo culture
    Virant-Klun, I.
    Kmecl, J.
    Bacer-Kermavner, L.
    Valentincic-Gruden, B.
    Mivsek, J.
    Stimpfel, M.
    Korosec, S.
    Vrtacnik-Bokal, E.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2017, 32 : 191 - 191
  • [32] Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted conception
    Blake, D.
    Proctor, M.
    Johnson, N.
    Olive, D.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2005, (04):
  • [33] Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted conception
    Blake, D. A.
    Farquhar, C. M.
    Johnson, N.
    Proctor, M.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2007, (04):
  • [34] Pregnancy outcome after blastocyst stage transfer comparing to early cleavage stage embryo transfer
    Aziminekoo, Elham
    Salehi, Maryam Sadat Mohseni
    Kalantari, Vahid
    Tehraninejad, Ensieh Shahrokh
    Haghollahi, Fedyeh
    Rashidi, Batool Hossein
    Zandieh, Zahra
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2015, 31 (11) : 880 - 884
  • [35] Compaction dynamics of the morula stage embryo defined by time-lapse monitoring predicts blastocyst formation rates and quality
    Keles, I.
    Balaban, B.
    Isiklar, A.
    Yakar, F.
    Tasdemir, M.
    Ata, B.
    Urman, B.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2016, 31 : 225 - 225
  • [36] COMPARISON OF CONCURRENT PREGNANCY RATES FOR INVITRO FERTILIZATION EMBRYO TRANSFER, PRONUCLEAR STAGE EMBRYO TRANSFER AND GAMETE INTRAFALLOPIAN TRANSFER
    HAMMITT, DG
    SYROP, CH
    HAHN, SJ
    WALKER, DL
    BUTKOWSKI, CR
    DONOVAN, JF
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1990, 5 (08) : 947 - 954
  • [37] A MORULA STAGE OF HUMAN OVUM DEVELOPED INVITRO
    SHETTLES, LB
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1955, 6 (04) : 287 - 289
  • [38] Blastocyst stage transfer: the real benefits compared with early embryo transfer
    Plachot, M
    Belaisch-Allart, J
    Mayenga, JM
    Chouraqui, A
    Serkine, AM
    Tesquier, L
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2000, 15 : 24 - 30
  • [39] Day 4 good morula embryo transfer provided compatible live birth rate with day 5 blastocyst embryo in fresh IVF/ET cycles
    Li, Ryh-Sheng
    Hwu, Yuh-Ming
    Lee, Robert Kuo-Kuang
    Li, Sheng-Hsiang
    Lin, Ming-Huei
    TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 57 (01): : 52 - 57
  • [40] Should we be promoting embryo transfer at blastocyst stage?
    Maheshwari, Abha
    Hamilton, Mark
    Bhattacharya, Siladitya
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2016, 32 (02) : 142 - 146