Response surface model comparison and combinations for remifentanil and propofol in describing response to esophageal instrumentation and adverse respiratory events

被引:2
|
作者
Jiang, Ziyi [1 ]
Liu, Yang [2 ]
Zhang, Xiaotong [1 ]
Ting, Chien-Kun [3 ,4 ]
Wang, Xiu [5 ]
Brewer, Lara M. [6 ]
Yu, Lu [1 ]
机构
[1] China Med Univ, Sch Intelligent Med, Dept Biomed Engn, 77 Puhe Rd,Shenyang North New Are, Shenyang 110122, Liaoning, Peoples R China
[2] China Med Univ, Dept Stomatol, Affiliated Hosp 4, Shenyang, Peoples R China
[3] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Taipei, Taiwan
[4] Natl Yang Ming Univ, Taipei, Taiwan
[5] China Med Univ, Dept Anesthesiol, Affiliated Hosp 4, Shenyang, Peoples R China
[6] Univ Utah, Dept Anesthesiol, Salt Lake City, UT USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Balanced anesthesia; Remifentanil; Propofol; Endotracheal anesthesia; Deep sedation; PHARMACODYNAMIC INTERACTION; DRUG SYNERGISM;
D O I
10.1016/j.jfma.2022.05.011
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The primary aim of this essay was to explore the best fitting model in remifentanil-propofol combined administrations during esophageal instrumentation (EI) from five distinct response surface models. The secondary aim was to combine the models to give appropriate effect-site drug concentrations (Ces) range with maximal comfort and safety. Methods: The Greco, reduced Greco, Minto, Scaled C50 Hierarchy and Fixed C50 Hierarchy models were constructed to fit four drug effects: loss of response to esophageal instrumentation (LREI), loss of response to esophageal instrumentation revised (LREIR), intolerable ventilatory depression (IVD) and respiratory compromise (RC). Models were tested by chi-square statistical test and evaluated with Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). Model prediction performance were measured by successful prediction rate (SPR) and three prediction errors. Results: The reduced Greco model was the best fitting model for LREI and RC, and the Minto model was the best fitting model for LREIR and IVD. The SPRs of reduced Greco model for LREI and RC were 81.76% and 79.81%. The SPRs of Minto model for LREIR and IVD were 80.32% and 80.12%. Overlay of the reduced Greco model for LREI and Minto model for IVD offered visual aid for guidance in drug administration. Conclusion: Using proper response surface model to fit different drug effects will describe the interactions between anesthetic drugs better. Combining response surface models to select the more reliable effect-site drug concentrations range can be used to guide clinical drug administration with greater safety and provide an improvement of anesthesia precision. Copyright (c) 2022, Formosan Medical Association. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:2501 / 2511
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Acute migraine therapy with frovatriptan vs. sumatriptan: comparison based on sustained pain-free response with no adverse events
    Campbell, J.
    Harper, S.
    Hu, X.
    CEPHALALGIA, 2009, 29 : 18 - 19
  • [42] A Comparison of the Effects on Respiratory Carbon Dioxide Response, Arterial Blood Pressure, and Heart Rate of Dexmedetomidine, Propofol, and Midazolam in Sevoflurane-Anesthetized Rabbits
    Chang, Cheng
    Uchiyama, Akinori
    Ma, Ling
    Mashimo, Takashi
    Fujino, Yuji
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2009, 109 (01): : 84 - 89
  • [43] Comparison of Anti-Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-COV-2) Antibody Response by Different Vaccine Combinations
    Muhtaroglu, Sabahattin
    Keti, Didem Barlak
    Baskol, Guelden
    Yildiz, Orhan
    Saracoglu, Hatice
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE AND RESEARCH, 2024, 46 (04): : 347 - 353
  • [44] Thermodynamic Interpretation of a Machine-Learning-Based Response Surface Model and Its Application to Pharmacodynamic Synergy between Propofol and Opioids
    Wang, Hsin-Yi
    Liou, Jing-Yang
    Lin, Chen
    Ting, Chien-Kun
    Chang, Wen-Kuei
    Lo, Men-Tzung
    Chen, Chien-Chang
    MATHEMATICS, 2022, 10 (10)
  • [45] Clinician-Clinician Agreement in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events in Cancer Patients: A Graded Response Model Approach (MT)
    Li, Yuelin
    Atkinson, Thomas
    Baser, Raymond
    Basch, Ethan
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2012, 20 : 46 - 46
  • [46] COMPARISON BETWEEN THE LAND-SURFACE RESPONSE OF THE ECMWF MODEL AND THE FIFE-1987 DATA
    BETTS, AK
    BALL, JH
    BELJAARS, ACM
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1993, 119 (513) : 975 - 1001
  • [47] Comparison of response rates on invitation mode of a web-based survey on influenza vaccine adverse events among healthcare workers: a pilot study
    Tai, Xiaochen
    Smith, Alanna M.
    McGeer, Allison J.
    Dube, Eve
    Holness, Dorothy Linn
    Katz, Kevin
    Hall, Linda McGillis
    McNeil, Shelly A.
    Powis, Jeff
    Coleman, Brenda L.
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2018, 18
  • [48] Comparison of response rates on invitation mode of a web-based survey on influenza vaccine adverse events among healthcare workers: a pilot study
    Xiaochen Tai
    Alanna M. Smith
    Allison J. McGeer
    Eve Dubé
    Dorothy Linn Holness
    Kevin Katz
    Linda McGillis Hall
    Shelly A. McNeil
    Jeff Powis
    Brenda L. Coleman
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18
  • [49] An Evaluation of Remifentanil-Sevoflurane Response Surface Models in Patients Emerging from Anesthesia: Model Improvement Using Effect-Site Sevoflurane Concentrations
    Johnson, Ken B.
    Syroid, Noah D.
    Gupta, Dhanesh K.
    Manyam, Sandeep C.
    Pace, Nathan L.
    LaPierre, Cris D.
    Egan, Talmage D.
    White, Julia L.
    Tyler, Diane
    Westenskow, Dwayne R.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2010, 111 (02): : 387 - 394
  • [50] A Response Surface Model Approach for Continuous Measures of Hypnotic and Analgesic Effect during Sevoflurane-Remifentanil Interaction Quantifying the Pharmacodynamic Shift Evoked by Stimulation
    Heyse, Bjorn
    Proost, Johannes H.
    Hannivoort, Laura N.
    Eleveld, Douglas J.
    Luginbuehl, Martin
    Struys, Michel M. R. F.
    Vereecke, Hugo E. M.
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2014, 120 (06) : 1390 - 1399