National political parties and European integration
被引:167
|
作者:
Marks, G
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ N Carolina, Dept Polit Sci, UNC Ctr European Studies, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USAUniv N Carolina, Dept Polit Sci, UNC Ctr European Studies, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
Marks, G
[1
]
Wilson, CJ
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:Univ N Carolina, Dept Polit Sci, UNC Ctr European Studies, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
Wilson, CJ
Ray, L
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:Univ N Carolina, Dept Polit Sci, UNC Ctr European Studies, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
Ray, L
机构:
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Polit Sci, UNC Ctr European Studies, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Univ Texas, Sch Social Sci, Richardson, TX 75083 USA
[3] Louisiana State Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
We test competing explanations for party positioning on the issue of European integration over the period 1984 to 1996 and find that the ideological location of a party in a party family is a powerful predictor of its position on this issue. Party family is a stronger Influence than strategic competition, national location, participation in government, or the position of a party's supporters, We conclude that political parties have bounded rationalities that shape how they process incentives in competitive party systems. Political cleavages give rise to ideological commitments or "prisms" through which political parties respond to new issues, including European integration.