Synchronous CODA opinion dynamics over social networks

被引:0
|
作者
Tang, Kun [1 ]
Zhao, Yiyi [2 ]
Zhang, Jiangbo [3 ]
Hu, Jiangping [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, Sch Automat Engn, Chengdu 611731, Peoples R China
[2] Southwestern Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Business Adm, Chengdu 611130, Peoples R China
[3] Southwest Petr Univ, Sch Sci, Chengdu 610500, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Hegelsman-Krause model; Bounded confidence rule; CODA model; Social imitation; BOUNDED CONFIDENCE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The continuous opinion and discrete actions (CODA) model is a practical approach in the field of opinion dynamics to investigate how action observation can change an agent's opinion and decision in a community. However, the original CODA model takes only a fixed number of agents' action in the process of opinion updating when, in fact, the opinion of an individual in society will be influenced by a group of agents whose opinions are close to him/her. In this study, we develop a variant of the Hegelsman-Krause (HK) model that averages the opinions updated by the CODA rule after observing neighbors' actions. Using this approach, we investigate the influence of social imitation on collective opinion evolution and decision making. We use a social network generated by the Barabasi-Albert(BA) algorithm to represent a social group. Simulation results show that agents' opinions are more likely to be polarized after communicating with more neighbors. The impact of the level of biased-mindedness is also investigated. The results show that agents in a biased-minded social group could reach opinion stabilization faster than in a non-biased minded social group. In addition, the ratio of choice increases monotonically with the level of bias.
引用
收藏
页码:5448 / 5453
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Learning and Forecasting Opinion Dynamics in Social Networks
    De, Abir
    Valera, Isabel
    Ganguly, Niloy
    Bhattacharya, Sourangshu
    Gomez-Rodriguez, Manuel
    ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 29 (NIPS 2016), 2016, 29
  • [22] Reasoning about opinion dynamics in social networks
    Hansen, Jens Ulrik
    JOURNAL OF LOGIC AND COMPUTATION, 2019, 29 (07) : 1121 - 1137
  • [23] Opinion Dynamics Considering Social Comparison in Online Social Networks
    Liu, Mengmeng
    Rong, Lili
    KNOWLEDGE AND SYSTEMS SCIENCES, KSS 2019, 2019, 1103 : 149 - 159
  • [24] Opinion containment in social networks over issue sequences
    Tian, Ye
    Jing, Gangshan
    Wang, Long
    2017 13TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON AUTOMATION SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING (CASE), 2017, : 1374 - 1379
  • [25] Agreements of Nonlinear Opinion Dynamics in Switching Social Networks
    Lee, Ti-Chung
    Su, Youfeng
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2024, 69 (06) : 4174 - 4181
  • [26] Reaching Consensus Based on the Opinion Dynamics in Social Networks
    Ji, Ying
    Li, Ping
    Wu, Zhong
    Qu, Deqiang
    ARABIAN JOURNAL FOR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2021, 46 (02) : 1677 - 1690
  • [27] Opinion dynamics model in social networks with heterogeneous nodes
    Zhou Q.-Y.
    Wu Z.-B.
    Kongzhi yu Juece/Control and Decision, 2023, 38 (01): : 257 - 264
  • [28] Opinion Dynamics and the Evolution of Social Power in Influence Networks
    Jia, Peng
    MirTabatabaei, Anahita
    Friedkin, Noah E.
    Bullo, Francesco
    SIAM REVIEW, 2015, 57 (03) : 367 - 397
  • [29] Opinion dynamics in social networks with heterogeneous Markovian agents
    Bolzern, Paolo
    Colaneri, Patrizio
    De Nicolao, Giuseppe
    2018 IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL (CDC), 2018, : 6180 - 6185
  • [30] Effect of the media on the opinion dynamics in online social networks
    Li, Tingyu
    Zhu, Hengmin
    PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2020, 551