Biodiversity in short-rotation coppice

被引:46
|
作者
Vanbeveren, Stefan P. P. [1 ]
Ceulemans, Reinhart [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Antwerp, Ctr Excellence Plants & Ecosyst PLECO, Dept Biol, Univ Pl 1, BE-2610 Antwerp, Belgium
[2] Slovenian Forestry Inst, Vecna Pot 2, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
来源
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
Animal diversity; Bioenergy; Climate change mitigation; Fungal diversity; Phytodiversity; SRC; HYBRID POPLAR PLANTATIONS; SOIL MITES ACARI; SMALL MAMMAL USE; PHRATORA-VULGATISSIMA; NEW-YORK; DIVERSITY; ENERGY; BIOMASS; BIRD; BIOENERGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2019.05.012
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Although short-rotation coppice (SRC) is a sustainable cultivation technique, biodiversity issues keep policy makers from encouraging farmers to establish SRC. From the 47 reviewed publications of this review 91% reported on poplar or willow SRC, and 63% focused on animal diversity. The alpha- and beta-diversity were most often studied by quantifying species richness and abundance. SRC had a positive effect on fungal diversity, which was negatively correlated to coppice rotation length, due to a higher nutrient demand after coppicing. In comparison with agricultural monocultures SRC provides a higher biodiversity, but it remains lower than that of mixed deciduous forests. Besides the planted genera and species, an understorey of generalist species similar to the previous land use develops and evolves to a forest-like understorey. At every coppice rotation the light availability changes and the planted area evolves from a bare field to a shrub-like vegetation, which later approaches a forest with a closed canopy. These changes in the plant community influence animal diversity. Bird populations similarly evolve from open-space to forest communities, continuously co-existing in shifting ratios. Arthropods and small mammals use the SRC to fulfil all of their habitat needs, while birds and large mammals only use the SRC for a limited number of resources. Recommendations for policy makers and SRC growers are provided, and areas for future research have been identified. It is concluded that introducing well-managed SRCs can enrich biodiversity in an agriculture-dominated landscape, but that SRCs most probably have a negative effect on biodiversity when introduced into a highly forested landscape.
引用
收藏
页码:34 / 43
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Harvesting disrupts biological control of herbivores in a short-rotation coppice system
    Björkman, C
    Bommarco, R
    Eklund, K
    Höglund, S
    ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2004, 14 (06) : 1624 - 1633
  • [22] Cadmium phytoextraction using short-rotation coppice Salix:: the evidence trail
    Dickinson, NM
    Pulford, ID
    ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 31 (04) : 609 - 613
  • [24] Impact of short-rotation coppice with poplar and willow on soil physical properties
    Kahle, Petra
    Janssen, Manon
    JOURNAL OF PLANT NUTRITION AND SOIL SCIENCE, 2020, 183 (02) : 119 - 128
  • [25] Estimation of chemical traits in poplar short-rotation coppice at stand level
    Guidi, Werther
    Tozzini, Cristiano
    Bonari, Enrico
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2009, 33 (12): : 1703 - 1709
  • [26] Generalized allometric regression to estimate biomass of Populus in short-rotation coppice
    Ben Brahim, M
    Gavaland, A
    Cabanettes, A
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 2000, 15 (02) : 171 - 176
  • [27] Growth and yield of mixed polyclonal stands of populus in short-rotation coppice
    Benbrahim, M
    Gavaland, A
    Gauvin, J
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 2000, 15 (06) : 605 - 610
  • [28] Defining leaf traits linked to yield in short-rotation coppice Salix
    Robinson, KM
    Karp, A
    Taylor, G
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2004, 26 (05): : 417 - 431
  • [29] Development of short-rotation willow coppice systems for environmental purposes in Sweden
    Mirck, J
    Isebrands, JG
    Verwijst, T
    Ledin, S
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2005, 28 (02): : 219 - 228
  • [30] Yield and spatial supply of bioenergy poplar and willow short-rotation coppice in the UK
    Aylott, Matthew J.
    Casella, E.
    Tubby, I.
    Street, N. R.
    Smith, P.
    Taylor, Gail
    NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2008, 178 (02) : 358 - 370