A systematic review of experiences of advanced practice nursing in general practice

被引:48
|
作者
Jakimowicz, Michael [1 ]
Williams, Danielle [2 ]
Stankiewicz, Grazyna [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tasmania, Sch Hlth Sci, 1 Leichhardt St, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, Australia
[2] Univ Tasmania, Sch Hlth Sci, Private Bag 135, Hobart, Tas 7001, Australia
[3] Univ Tasmania, Sch Hlth Sci, Locked Bag 5052, Alexandria, NSW 2015, Australia
来源
BMC NURSING | 2017年 / 16卷
关键词
Advanced practice; General practice; Systematic review; Qualitative research; PRACTICE NURSES; BARRIERS; CARE; PRACTITIONERS; ROLES; BOUNDARIES; ENABLERS; INSULIN; PEOPLE; TIME;
D O I
10.1186/s12912-016-0198-7
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: Despite efforts to achieve conceptual clarity, advanced practice nursing continues to reside in a liminal space, unable to secure ongoing recognition as a viable means of healthcare delivery. This is particularly evident in general practice where advanced practice role development is more fluid and generally less supported by the hierarchical structures evident in the hospital system. This review synthesises published qualitative studies reporting experiences of advanced practice nursing in general practice. The panoramic view provided by patients, nurses and doctors within this novel context, offers a fresh perspective on why advanced practice nurses have struggled to gain acceptance within the healthcare milieu. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of qualitative studies that explored the experiences of patients, nurses and doctors who had contact with advanced practice nurses working in general practice. Published work from 1990 to June 2016 was located using CINAHL and PubMed. The full text of relevant studies was retrieved after reading the title and abstract. Critical appraisal was undertaken and the findings of included studies were analysed using the constant comparative method. Emergent codes were collapsed into sub-themes and themes. Results: Twenty articles reporting the experiences of 486 participants were included. We identified one major theme: legitimacy; and three sub-themes: (1) establishing and maintaining confidence in the advanced practice nurse, (2) strengthening and weakening boundaries between general practitioners and advanced practice nurses and (3) establishing and maintaining the value of advanced practice nursing. Conclusions: We set out to describe experiences of advanced practice nursing in general practice. We discovered that general practitioners and patients continue to have concerns around responsibility, trust and accountability. Additionally, advanced practice nurses struggle to negotiate and clarify scopes of practice while general practitioners have trouble justifying the costs associated with advanced practice nursing roles. Therefore, much work remains to establish and maintain the legitimacy of advanced practice nursing in general practice.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Advanced nursing practice
    不详
    INTERNATIONAL NURSING REVIEW, 2007, 54 (01) : 9 - 9
  • [22] Advanced nursing practice
    Winfield, Louise
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2007, 58 (06) : 615 - 615
  • [23] The effect of general practice team composition and climate on staff and patient experiences: a systematic review
    Abrams, Ruth
    Jones, Bridget
    Campbell, John
    de Lusignan, Simon
    Peckham, Stephen
    Gage, Heather
    BJGP OPEN, 2024, 8 (01)
  • [24] The impact of general practice team composition and climate on staff and patient experiences: a systematic review
    Abrams, Ruth
    Jones, Bridget
    Gage, Heather
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2023, 73
  • [25] DOCTOR OF NURSING PRACTICE EDUCATION: IMPACT ON ADVANCED NURSING PRACTICE
    Paplham, Pamela
    Austin-Ketch, Tammy
    SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2015, 31 (04) : 273 - 281
  • [26] Remote consultations in general practice - A systematic review
    Vodicka, Stasa
    Zelko, Erika
    ZDRAVSTVENO VARSTVO, 2022, 61 (04): : 224 - 230
  • [27] Telephone consultations for general practice: a systematic review
    Downes, Martin J.
    Mervin, Merehau C.
    Byrnes, Joshua M.
    Scuffham, Paul A.
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2017, 6
  • [28] Telemedicine for general practice: A systematic review protocol
    Downes M.J.
    Mervin M.C.
    Byrnes J.M.
    Scuffham P.A.
    Systematic Reviews, 4 (1)
  • [29] Applying the results of a systematic review in general practice
    Doust, JA
    Silagy, CA
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2000, 172 (04) : 153 - 156
  • [30] Nutritional deficiency in general practice: a systematic review
    van Wayenburg, CAM
    van de Laar, FA
    van Weel, C
    van Staveren, WA
    van Binsbergen, JJ
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2005, 59 (Suppl 1) : S81 - S87