Governance of Responsible AI: From Ethical Guidelines to Cooperative Policies

被引:14
|
作者
Gianni, Robert [1 ]
Lehtinen, Santtu [2 ]
Nieminen, Mika [2 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, Brightland Inst Smart Soc, Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] VTT Tech Res Ctr Finland, Ethics & Responsibil Innovat, Tampere, Finland
来源
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
Artificial Intelligence; governance; ethics; democracy-citizen; National Strategy for Artificial Intelligence; pragmatism; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE; TRANSPARENCY;
D O I
10.3389/fcomp.2022.873437
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The increasingly pervasive role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in our societies is radically changing the way that social interaction takes place within all fields of knowledge. The obvious opportunities in terms of accuracy, speed and originality of research are accompanied by questions about the possible risks and the consequent responsibilities involved in such a disruptive technology. In recent years, this twofold aspect has led to an increase in analyses of the ethical and political implications of AI. As a result, there has been a proliferation of documents that seek to define the strategic objectives of AI together with the ethical precautions required for its acceptable development and deployment. Although the number of documents is certainly significant, doubts remain as to whether they can effectively play a role in safeguarding democratic decision-making processes. Indeed, a common feature of the national strategies and ethical guidelines published in recent years is that they only timidly address how to integrate civil society into the selection of AI objectives. Although scholars are increasingly advocating the necessity to include civil society, it remains unclear which modalities should be selected. If both national strategies and ethics guidelines appear to be neglecting the necessary role of a democratic scrutiny for identifying challenges, objectives, strategies and the appropriate regulatory measures that such a disruptive technology should undergo, the question is then, what measures can we advocate that are able to overcome such limitations? Considering the necessity to operate holistically with AI as a social object, what theoretical framework can we adopt in order to implement a model of governance? What conceptual methodology shall we develop that is able to offer fruitful insights to governance of AI? Drawing on the insights of classical pragmatist scholars, we propose a framework of democratic experimentation based on the method of social inquiry. In this article, we first summarize some of the main points of discussion around the potential societal, ethical and political issues of AI systems. We then identify the main answers and solutions by analyzing current national strategies and ethics guidelines. After showing the theoretical and practical limits of these approaches, we outline an alternative proposal that can help strengthening the active role of society in the discussion about the role and extent of AI systems.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Ethical Principles and Governance Technology Development of AI in China
    Wu, Wenjun
    Huang, Tiejun
    Gong, Ke
    ENGINEERING, 2020, 6 (03) : 302 - 309
  • [32] From Responsible AI Governance to Competitive Performance: The Mediating Role of Knowledge Management Capabilities
    Papagiannidis, Emmanouil
    Mikalef, Patrick
    Krogstie, John
    Conboy, Kieran
    ROLE OF DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES IN SHAPING THE POST-PANDEMIC WORLD, 2022, 13454 : 58 - 69
  • [33] Role of Ethical and Responsible AI in Education for Next Generation Inventors
    Kathala, Krishna Chaitanya Rao
    Arroyo, Ivon
    Mannuru, Nishith Reddy
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN EDUCATION: POSTERS AND LATE BREAKING RESULTS, WORKSHOPS AND TUTORIALS, INDUSTRY AND INNOVATION TRACKS, PRACTITIONERS, DOCTORAL CONSORTIUM AND BLUE SKY, AIED 2024, 2024, 2151 : 71 - 78
  • [34] Global production networks, ethical campaigning, and the embeddedness of responsible governance
    Hughes, Alex
    Wrigley, Neil
    Buttle, Martin
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY, 2008, 8 (03) : 345 - 367
  • [35] Humanizing AI in medical training: ethical framework for responsible design
    Sqalli, Mohammed Tahri
    Aslonov, Begali
    Gafurov, Mukhammadjon
    Nurmatov, Shokhrukhbek
    FRONTIERS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2023, 6
  • [36] Integrating a Blockchain-Based Governance Framework for Responsible AI
    Asif, Rameez
    Hassan, Syed Raheel
    Parr, Gerard
    FUTURE INTERNET, 2023, 15 (03):
  • [37] Transparency and Explainability of AI Systems: Ethical Guidelines in Practice
    Balasubramaniam, Nagadivya
    Kauppinen, Marjo
    Hiekkanen, Kari
    Kujala, Sari
    REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING: FOUNDATION FOR SOFTWARE QUALITY, REFSQ 2022, 2022, 13216 : 3 - 18
  • [38] Ethical Guidelines for the Application of Generative AI in German Journalism
    Lennart Hofeditz
    Anna-Katharina Jung
    Milad Mirbabaie
    Stefan Stieglitz
    Digital Society, 2025, 4 (1):
  • [39] Can we build guidelines for trustworthy, ethical AI?
    Dignum, Virginia
    ITU News, 2019, 2019 (03): : 57 - 59
  • [40] Who is responsible for AI-generated public health policies?
    Naumova, Elena N.
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH POLICY, 2023, 44 (04) : 517 - 522