A profile of Pennsylvania's hardwood sawmill industry

被引:0
|
作者
Smith, PM [1 ]
Dasmohapatra, S
Luppold, WG
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Forest Resources Lab 305, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] US Forest Serv, USDA, NE Res Sta, Princeton, WV 24740 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
A mail survey of all identified hardwood sawmills in Pennsylvania was conducted in the fall of 2000 to better understand firm size, species used, origin of logs, processing technology employed, the hardwood lumber grades produced, and the value-added features performed by these sawmills in 1999. An adjusted response rate of 31 percent was obtained for the study's 161 usable surveys. Pennsylvania's sawmills produced approximately 1.3 billion board feet of hardwood lumber in 1999. Responding sawmills producing over 3 million board feet (MMBF) per year (1/3 of the firms) accounted for 80 percent of total production. Red and white oak comprised 40 percent of the log volume purchased by responding sawmills in 1999 followed by yellow-poplar (13%), cherry (13%), soft maple (9%), hard maple (7%), and ash (5%). Thirty-eight percent of responding sawmills employed foresters. The vast majority (80%) of hardwood logs were purchased from non-industrial private forest land, followed by state forests (10%), industrial private forests (9%), federal forests (1%), and municipal lands (1%). Circle headrigs were used by 75 percent of responding sawmills; however, two-thirds of very large firms (10 MMBF and greater) used band headrigs. Whereas only 35 percent of all Pennsylvania hardwood sawmills used a computer-aided headrig, nearly all (94%) of the largest sawmills sampled used computer-aided headrigs in 1999. Approximately 19 percent of the hardwood lumber produced by our study respondents in 1999 was First and Seconds (FAS) & Select (SEL) grade followed by No. I Common (24%), No. 2 Common (17%), No. 3A and 3B Common (8%), pallet grade (23%), tie grade (6%), and other (3%). The 16 largest sawmills (10 MMBF+) produced a significantly higher percent of FAS & SEL (30%) lumber grade in 1999 as compared to the study's smaller sawmills. NHLA grading was the most common value-added process performed by responding sawmills (47%) in 1999 followed by kiln-drying (30%), surfacing (3 0%), custom sorting (26%), end-coating (25%), and custom grading (21%).
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 49
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] EDGING CONVENTION OF THE SAWMILL INDUSTRY
    不详
    PAPERI JA PUU-PAPER AND TIMBER, 1982, 64 (03): : 155 - 156
  • [22] ENERGY AND THE US HARDWOOD INDUSTRY - PART I: PROFILE AND IMPACT OF PRICES
    Espinoza, Omar
    Bond, Brian H.
    Buehlmann, Urs
    BIORESOURCES, 2011, 6 (04): : 3883 - 3898
  • [23] Occupational hazards in sawmill industry and its effect on sawmill output in Nigeria
    Abraham Falola
    Ridwan Mukaila
    Adetunji Sanjo Olanrewaju
    Mobolaji O. Musa
    Clement Adanu Abarike
    Safety in Extreme Environments, 2024, 6 (4): : 333 - 342
  • [24] PENNSYLVANIA PROFILE
    NASH, M
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NURSING, 1989, 89 (09) : 1213 - 1213
  • [25] Forecasting hardwood stumpage price trends in Pennsylvania
    Linehan, PE
    Jacobson, MG
    FOREST PRODUCTS JOURNAL, 2005, 55 (12) : 47 - 52
  • [26] OAK-HARDWOOD REPRODUCTION IN CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA
    WARD, WW
    JOURNAL OF FORESTRY, 1966, 64 (11) : 744 - &
  • [27] EFFECT OF HARDWOOD SAWMILL EDGING AND TRIMMING PRACTICES ON FURNITURE PART PRODUCTION
    KLINE, DE
    REGALADO, C
    WENGERT, EM
    LAMB, FM
    ARAMAN, PA
    FOREST PRODUCTS JOURNAL, 1993, 43 (03) : 22 - 26
  • [28] Alternative uses of sawmill industry waste
    Fregoso-Madueno, Jesus N.
    Goche-Telles, Jose R.
    Rutiaga-Quinones, Jose G.
    Gonzalez-Laredo, Ruben F.
    Bocanegra-Salazar, Melissa
    Chavez-Simental, Jorge A.
    REVISTA CHAPINGO SERIE CIENCIAS FORESTALES Y DEL AMBIENTE, 2017, 23 (02) : 243 - 260
  • [29] WILL CHIPPING HEADRIGS REVOLUTIONIZE SAWMILL INDUSTRY
    OY, H
    NORSK SKOGINDUSTRI, 1971, 25 (04): : 100 - &
  • [30] FINNISH SAWMILL INDUSTRY - GENERAL MEETING
    不详
    PAPERI JA PUU-PAPER AND TIMBER, 1976, 58 (01): : 19 - 20