共 50 条
Development and validation of a novel informational booklet for pediatric long-term ventilation decision support
被引:9
|作者:
Edwards, Jeffrey D.
[1
]
Panitch, Howard B.
[2
]
George, Maureen
[3
]
Cirrilla, Anne-Marie
[4
]
Grunstein, Eli
[5
]
Wolfe, Joanne
[6
,7
]
Nelson, Judith E.
[8
,9
]
Miller, Rachel L.
[10
]
机构:
[1] Columbia Univ, Valegos Coll Phys & Surg, Div Crit Care & Hosp Med, Dept Pediat, New York, NY USA
[2] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Div Pulm Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Columbia Univ, Sch Nursing, New York, NY USA
[4] New York Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Childrens Ho, Dept Care Coordinat Social Work, New York, NY USA
[5] Columbia Univ, Valegos Coll Phys & Surg, Div Pediat Otolaryngol, New York, NY USA
[6] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Dept Psychosocial Oncol & Palliat Care, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[7] Boston Childrens Hosp, Dept Pediat, Boston, MA USA
[8] Weill Cornell Med Coll, Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Crit Care Serv, New York, NY USA
[9] Weill Cornell Med Coll, Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Palliat Med Serv, New York, NY USA
[10] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Dept Med, Div Clin Immunol, New York, NY 10029 USA
关键词:
children;
decision making shared;
mechanical ventilation;
noninvasive ventilation;
respiration artificial;
tracheostomy;
RESPIRATORY-FAILURE;
CHILDREN;
FAMILIES;
TRACHEOSTOMIES;
CONFLICT;
PARENTS;
D O I:
10.1002/ppul.25221
中图分类号:
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号:
100202 ;
摘要:
Objectives To provide accessible, uniform, comprehensive, and balanced information to families deciding whether to initiate long-term ventilation (LTV) for their child, we sought to develop and validate a novel informational resource. Methods The Ottawa Decision Support Framework was followed. Previous interviews with 44 lay and 15 professional stakeholders and published literature provided content for a booklet. Iterative versions were cognitive tested with six parents facing decisions and five pediatric intensivists. Ten parents facing decisions evaluated the booklet using the Preparation for Decision Making Scale and reported their decisional conflict, which was juxtaposed to the conflict of 21 parents who did not read it, using the Decisional Conflict Scale. Twelve home ventilation program directors evaluated the booklet's clinical sensibility and sensitivity, using a self-designed six-item questionnaire. Data presented using summary statistics. Results The illustrated booklet (6th-grade reading level) has nine topical sections on chronic respiratory failure and invasive and noninvasive LTV, including the option to forgo LTV. Ten parents who read the booklet rated it as helping "Quite a bit" or more on all items of the Preparation for Decision Making Scale and had seemingly less decisional conflict than 21 parents who did not. Twelve directors rated it highly for clinical sensibility and sensitivity. Conclusions The LTV booklet was rigorously developed and favorably evaluated. It offers a resource to improve patient/family knowledge, supplement shared decision-making, and reduce decisional conflict around LTV decisions. Future studies should validate it in other settings and further study its effectiveness.
引用
收藏
页码:1198 / 1204
页数:7
相关论文