Risk of Prostate Cancer after a Negative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guided Biopsy

被引:24
|
作者
Kinnaird, Adam [1 ]
Sharma, Vidit [1 ]
Chuang, Ryan [1 ]
Priester, Alan [2 ]
Tran, Elizabeth [1 ]
Barsa, Danielle E. [1 ]
Delfin, Merdie [1 ]
Kwan, Lorna [1 ]
Sisk, Anthony [3 ]
Felker, Ely [4 ]
Marks, Leonard S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Urol, 300 Stein Plaza,3rd Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Bioengn, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Los Angeles, CA USA
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Radiol Sci, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 2020年 / 204卷 / 06期
关键词
biopsy; prostatic neoplasms; magnetic resonance imaging;
D O I
10.1097/JU.0000000000001232
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsy which reveals no cancer may impart reassurance beyond that offered by ultrasound guided biopsy. However, followup of men after a negative magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsy has been mostly by prostate specific antigen testing and reports of followup tissue confirmation are few. We investigated the incidence of clinically significant prostate cancer in such men who, because of persistent cancer suspicion, subsequently underwent a repeat magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsy. Materials and Methods: Subjects were all men with a negative initial magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsy who underwent at least 1 further magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsy due to continued clinical suspicion of clinically significant prostate cancer (September 2009 to July 2019). Biopsies were magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion with targeted and systematic cores. Regions of interest from initial magnetic resonance imaging and any new regions of interest at followup magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsy were targeted. The primary end point was detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (Gleason Grade Group 2 or greater). Results: Of 2,716 men 733 had a negative initial magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsy. Study subjects were 73/733 who underwent followup magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsy. Median (IQR) age and prostate specific antigen density were 64 years (59-67) and 0.12 ng/ml/cc (0.08-0.17), respectively. Baseline PI-RADS (R) scores were 3 or greater in 74%. At followup magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsy (median 2.4 years, IQR 1.3e3.6), 17/73 (23%) were diagnosed with clinically significant prostate cancer. When followup magnetic resonance imaging revealed a lesion (PI-RADS 3 or greater), clinically significant prostate cancer was found in 17/53 (32%). When followup magnetic resonance imaging was negative (PI-RADS less than 3), cancer was not found (0/ 20) (p <0.01). Overall 54% of men with PI-RADS 5 at followup magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsy were found to have clinically significant prostate cancer. Conclusions: Men with negative magnetic resonance imaging following an initial negative magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsy are unlikely to harbor clinically significant prostate cancer and may avoid repeat biopsy. However, when lesions are seen on followup magnetic resonance imaging, repeat magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsy is warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:1180 / 1186
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Cognitive Prostate Biopsy Versus Magnetic Resonance ImagingUltrasound Fusion Prostate Biopsy in The Detection of Prostate Cancer
    Bhojwani, A.
    Desai, C.
    Ehsanullah, S. A.
    Shahzad, S. A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 108
  • [32] Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guided Prostate Biopsy in Men With Repeat Negative Biopsies and Increased Prostate Specific Antigen EDITORIAL COMMENT
    Schilling, David
    Stenzl, Arnulf
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (02): : 527 - 528
  • [33] Magnetic Resonance-Guided Prostate Biopsy
    Dianat, S. Saeid
    Carter, H. Ballentine
    Macura, Katarzyna J.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2015, 23 (04) : 621 - +
  • [34] Re: Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy Improves Cancer Detection Following Transrectal Ultrasound Biopsy and Correlates With Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Robertson, Nicola L.
    Moore, Caroline M.
    Emberton, Mark
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 187 (04): : 1511 - 1512
  • [35] Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Biopsy in Patients with a Prior Negative Biopsy: A Consensus Statement by AUA and SAR
    Rosenkrantz, Andrew B.
    Verma, Sadhna
    Choyke, Peter
    Eberhardt, Steven C.
    Eggener, Scott E.
    Gaitonde, Krishnanath
    Haider, Masoom A.
    Margolis, Daniel J.
    Marks, Leonard S.
    Pinto, Peter
    Sonn, Geoffrey A.
    Taneja, Samir S.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 196 (06): : 1613 - 1618
  • [36] Comparison of prostate cancer biopsy guided by magnetic resonance imaging, transrectal ultrasound and their combination scheme in biopsy Naive patients
    Wu, W.
    Huang, H.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 24 : 102 - 102
  • [37] Prostate cancer detection rates of magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy related to Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System score
    Daniël F. Osses
    Joost J. van Asten
    Gerard J. Kieft
    Jasper D. Tijsterman
    World Journal of Urology, 2017, 35 : 207 - 212
  • [38] Prostate cancer detection rates of magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy related to Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System score
    Osses, Daniel F.
    van Asten, Joost J.
    Kieft, Gerard J.
    Tijsterman, Jasper D.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 35 (02) : 207 - 212
  • [40] Prognostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsy in defining prostate cancer anterior lesions
    Porreca, Angelo
    Bianchi, Federico Mineo
    Salvaggio, Antonio
    D'Agostino, Daniele
    Del Rosso, Alessandro
    Romagnoli, Daniele
    Corsi, Paolo
    Colicchia, Michele
    Barbaresi, Umberto
    Bianchi, Lorenzo
    Giampaoli, Marco
    Schiavina, Riccardo
    Palmer, Katie
    Del Giudice, Francesco
    Maggi, Martina
    Ferro, Matteo
    Sciarra, Alessandro
    De Berardinis, Ettore
    Busetto, Gian Maria
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 39 (05) : 1473 - 1479