The effect of a terrorist attack on emergency department inflow: an observation study using difference-in-differences methodology

被引:1
|
作者
Ekstrom, Andreas [1 ]
Eng-Larsson, Fredrik [2 ]
Isaksson, Olov [2 ]
Kurland, Lisa [3 ,4 ]
Nordberg, Martin [1 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Dept Clin Sci & Educ, Sodersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Stockholm Univ, Stockholm Business Sch, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Orebro Univ, Dept Med Sci, Orebro, Sweden
[4] Orebro Univ Hosp, Dept Emergency Med, Orebro, Sweden
来源
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF TRAUMA RESUSCITATION & EMERGENCY MEDICINE | 2019年 / 27卷 / 1期
关键词
Emergency service; Hospital; Patient acceptance of health care; Terrorism; Health behavior; HURRICANE SANDY; IMPACT; MANHATTAN; STRESS; VISITS; MODELS; CARE;
D O I
10.1186/s13049-019-0634-2
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Study objectiveThe objective of this study was to investigate how the terrorist attack in Stockholm, Sweden affected patient inflow to the general emergency departments (EDs) in close proximity of the attack. The study analyzed if, and to what extent, the attack impacted ED inflow during the following days and weeks.MethodsIn a retrospective observational study, anonymized aggregated data on ED arrivals (inflow of patients) to all seven of the EDs in the Stockholm County was analyzed using the Difference-in-Differences (DiD) estimator. The control groups were the affected hospitals in the years prior to the terrorist attack. The number of ED visits was retrieved from the Stockholm County Council administrative database.ResultsThe study shows a statistically significant reduction in overall ED inflow of 7-9% following the attack. The effect was strongest initially after the attack, and ED inflow regained normal levels within approximately three weeks' time, without any significant rebound effect. The effect on ED inflow also decreased with distance from ground zero, and was not significant further away than 10km.ConclusionThe results showed that ED inflow was significantly decreased in the weeks immediately following the Stockholm terrorist attack. The reasons for this cannot be fully explained in this observational study. However, the results suggest that some patients actively choose when, where and if they should go to the ED.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [21] Assessing time to treatment and patient inflow in a Danish emergency department: A cohort study using data from electronic emergency screen boards
    Nielsen R.F.
    Pérez N.
    Petersen P.
    Biering K.
    BMC Research Notes, 7 (1)
  • [22] The effect of urban innovation performance of smart city construction policies: Evaluate by using a multiple period difference-in-differences model
    Guo, Qingbin
    Zhong, Jinrong
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2022, 184
  • [23] Long-term exposure to ambient temperature and mortality risk in China: A nationwide study using the difference-in-differences design
    Hu, Jianxiong
    Zhou, Maigeng
    Qin, Mingfang
    Tong, Shilu
    Hou, Zhulin
    Xu, Yanjun
    Zhou, Chunliang
    Xiao, Yize
    Yu, Min
    Huang, Biao
    Xu, Xiaojun
    Lin, Lifeng
    Liu, Tao
    Xiao, Jianpeng
    Gong, Weiwei
    Hu, Ruying
    Li, Junhua
    Jin, Donghui
    Zhao, Qinglong
    Yin, Peng
    Xu, Yiqing
    Zeng, Weilin
    Li, Xing
    He, Guanhao
    Huang, Cunrui
    Ma, Wenjun
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2022, 292
  • [24] Analyzing the Causal Effect of Obesity on Socioeconomic Status-the Case for Using Difference-in-Differences Estimates in Addition to Fixed Effects Models
    Lehmann, Judith
    METHODS DATA ANALYSES, 2024, 18 (01): : 33 - 58
  • [26] Effect of national COVID-19 control measures on water quality in China using an improved dual difference-in-differences method
    Zhao, Jian
    Liu, Qingqing
    Bai, Jing
    Liu, Haixia
    Ding, Lin
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 901
  • [27] Effect of emergency declaration on mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan: A social network service-based difference-in-differences approach
    Eguchi, Akifumi
    Yoneoka, Daisuke
    Shi, Shoi
    Tanoue, Yuta
    Kawashima, Takayuki
    Nomura, Shuhei
    Makiyama, Koji
    Uryu, Shinya
    Sawada, Masayuki
    Kawamura, Yumi
    Takayanagi, Shinichi
    Gilmour, Stuart
    Miyata, Hiroaki
    SCIENCE PROGRESS, 2021, 104 (03)
  • [28] Using Negative Control Outcomes and Difference-in-Differences Analysis to Estimate Treatment Effects in an Entirely Treated Cohort: The Effect of Ivacaftor in Cystic Fibrosis
    Newsome, Simon J.
    Daniel, Rhian M.
    Carr, Siobhan B.
    Bilton, Diana
    Keogh, Ruth H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2022, 191 (03) : 505 - 515
  • [29] Variations in hospitalization and emergency department or observation (ED/OB) stays using the oncology care model (OCM) methodology in Medicare data.
    Li, Shuling
    Peng, Yi
    Li, Suying
    Raskin, Leon
    Kelsh, Michael Anthony
    Zaha, Rebecca
    Gawade, Prasad L.
    Henry, David
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 36 (30)
  • [30] Effect of the national integrated demonstration area for the prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases programme on behavioural risk factors in China: a synthetic difference-in-differences study
    Dong, Wenlan
    Zhang, Xiao
    Liu, Shiwei
    Zhang, Xian
    Li, Zhaosheng
    Gu, Ming
    Yang, Yibing
    Li, Han
    Qian, Jing
    Zhang, Mei
    Wang, Limin
    Yan, Lijing L.
    Wu, Jing
    LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH-WESTERN PACIFIC, 2024, 50