Common factors in psychotherapy outcome: Meta-analytic findings and their implications for practice and research

被引:66
|
作者
Drisko, JW [1 ]
机构
[1] Smith Coll, Sch Social Work, Northampton, MA 01063 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1606/1044-3894.239
中图分类号
D669 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
It is often reported in meta-analytic studies of adult psychotherapy that psychotherapy produces positive change but that there are few significant differences between different types of psychotherapy. Because meta-analyses indicate more similarities than differences among therapies, the "active ingredients" of therapy appear to include important factors in addition to specific therapeutic techniques. Research on common factors across therapies has existed for more than 60 years but is rarely mentioned in the social work literature. Common factors include the client and the client's context, the therapeutic relationship, and expectancy. These studies support the worth of the efforts of social work practitioners, suggest avenues for future research, and have implications for policy and education. The author of this article describes relevant meta-analytic studies of adult psychotherapy, examines the common factors perspective on psychotherapy efficacy, and sets forth implications for social work.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 90
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] An Empirical Assessment of Meta-Analytic Practice
    Dieckmann, Nathan F.
    Malle, Bertram F.
    Bodner, Todd E.
    REVIEW OF GENERAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 13 (02) : 101 - 115
  • [22] Personalized Psychotherapy for Adult Depression: A Meta-Analytic Review
    Cuijpers, Pim
    Ebert, David D.
    Acarturk, Ceren
    Andersson, Gerhard
    Cristea, Ioana A.
    BEHAVIOR THERAPY, 2016, 47 (06) : 966 - 980
  • [23] Bias in meta-analytic estimates of the absolute efficacy of psychotherapy
    Staines, Graham L.
    Cleland, Charles M.
    REVIEW OF GENERAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 11 (04) : 329 - 347
  • [24] The differential effectiveness of group psychotherapy: A meta-analytic perspective
    Burlingame, GM
    Fuhriman, A
    Mosier, J
    GROUP DYNAMICS-THEORY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2003, 7 (01) : 3 - 12
  • [25] A meta-analytic review of the effectiveness of inpatient group psychotherapy
    Koesters, Markus
    Burlingame, Gary M.
    Nachtigall, Christof
    Strauss, Bernhard
    GROUP DYNAMICS-THEORY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2006, 10 (02) : 146 - 163
  • [26] Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Meta-Analytic Findings
    Kaplan, Alexandra D.
    Kessler, Theresa T.
    Brill, J. Christopher
    Hancock, P. A.
    HUMAN FACTORS, 2023, 65 (02) : 337 - 359
  • [27] The Influence of Judgment Calls on Meta-Analytic Findings
    Tarrahi, Farid
    Eisend, Martin
    MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 2016, 51 (2-3) : 314 - 329
  • [28] Updating meta-analytic research findings: Bayesian approaches versus the medical model
    Schmidt, Frank L.
    Raju, Nambury S.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 92 (02) : 297 - 308
  • [29] Meta-analytic procedures for social research
    Becker, BJ
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL STATISTICS, 1998, 23 (01) : 77 - 92
  • [30] A review of meta-analytic research in accounting
    Khlif, Hichem
    Chalmers, Keryn
    JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING LITERATURE, 2015, 35 : 1 - 27