Healthcare and Indirect Cost of the Laparoscopic vs. Vaginal Approach in Benign Hysterectomy

被引:1
|
作者
Angeles Martinez-Maestre, Maria [1 ]
Jodar-Sanchez, Francisco [2 ]
Maria Calderon-Cabrera, Ana [1 ]
Gonzalez-Cejudo, Carmen [1 ]
Manuel Silvan-Alfaro, Jose [1 ]
Maria Melero-Cortes, Lidia [1 ]
机构
[1] Virgen Rocio Univ Hosp, Dept Gynecol, Avda Manuel Siurot S-N, ES-41013 Seville, Spain
[2] Univ Malaga, Dept Stat & Econometr, Malaga, Spain
关键词
Gynecologic Diseases; Health Care Costs; Indirect Expenditures; Laparoscopic Surgery; Vaginal Hysterectomy; ABDOMINAL HYSTERECTOMY; EVALUATE; TRIAL; ROUTE; UTERI;
D O I
10.4293/JSLS.2022.00048
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Objectives: The aim of this study was to analyze indirect costs of vaginal and laparoscopic routes for hysterectomy to determine whether this makes a difference in total costs when considering route for surgery.Methods: A five-year observational retrospective cohort study was conducted in an academic tertiary care cen-ter. A total of 517 patients scheduled for total laparo-scopic hysterectomy (n = 137) and vaginal hysterectomy (n = 380) for benign conditions between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2012 meeting inclusion criteria were reviewed.Results: Indirect costs were higher in the vaginal hyster-ectomy group compared to the laparoscopic hysterec-tomy group (mean cost euro 3,239.86 vs. euro 1,371.58; cost increase of euro 1,868.28; p < .001). Indirect costs due to lost-work-productivity were the most important, represented by 97.7% in the vaginal group and 93.6% in the laparo-scopic group.Conclusion: Among women undergoing hysterectomy for benign disease, laparoscopic hysterectomy appears to be superior to vaginal hysterectomy when indirect costs are analyzed in a five-year temporal horizon. Laparoscopic hys-terectomy is a good alternative to vaginal hysterectomy when technically feasible as both present comparable advantages. The surgical approach to hysterectomy should be decided in light of the relative benefits and hazards, which will depend on clinical circumstances and surgical expertise.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Randomized Trial Comparing Vaginal and Laparoscopic Hysterectomy vs Robot-Assisted Hysterectomy
    Lonnerfors, Celine
    Reynisson, Petur
    Persson, Jan
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 22 (01) : 78 - 86
  • [32] Vaginal hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign disease: a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials
    Gendy, Rasha
    Walsh, Colin A.
    Walsh, Stewart R.
    Karantanis, Emmanuel
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 204 (05) : 388.e1 - 388.e8
  • [33] Vnotes: a vaginal approach to laparoscopic hysterectomy and prolapse repair
    Miceli, L. M.
    Lindo, F. M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 226 (03) : S1352 - S1352
  • [34] A cost analysis of endometrial ablation, abdominal hysterectomy, vaginal hysterectomy, and laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy in the treatment of primary menorrhagia
    Ransom, SB
    McNeeley, SG
    White, C
    Diamond, MP
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF GYNECOLOGIC LAPAROSCOPISTS, 1996, 4 (01): : 29 - 32
  • [35] USE AND OUTCOMES OF ROBOTIC-ASSISTED VS. CONVENTIONAL LAPAROSCOPIC HYSTERECTOMY FOR BENIGN DISEASE IN THE UNITED STATES
    Rosero, E. B.
    Kho, K.
    Joshi, G.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2013, 116 : 179 - 179
  • [36] Vaginal evisceration after hysterectomy: the repair by a laparoscopic and vaginal approach with a omental flap
    Narducci, F
    Sonoda, Y
    Lambaudie, E
    Leblanc, E
    Querleu, D
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2003, 89 (03) : 549 - 551
  • [37] Retrospective study of laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) for benign gynecological disorders
    Condeco, R.
    Barros, L.
    Barreto, S.
    Leitao, C.
    Silva, M. C.
    Mira, R.
    14TH WORLD CONGRESS ON CONTROVERSIES IN OBSTETRICS, GYNECOLOGY & INFERTILITY (COGI), 2011, : 197 - 201
  • [38] Discussion: 'Laparoscopic versus vaginal hysterectomy for benign pathology' by Candiani et al
    Candiani, M.
    Izzo, S.
    Bulfoni, A.
    Riparini, J.
    Ronzoni, S.
    Marconi, A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 200 (04) : E1 - E6
  • [39] The Outcomes and Cost of Hysterectomy: Comparing Abdominal, Vaginal, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Approaches
    Sarah L. Cohen
    Jon I. Einarsson
    Current Obstetrics and Gynecology Reports, 2014, 3 (4) : 277 - 280
  • [40] The Outcomes and Cost of Hysterectomy: Comparing Abdominal, Vaginal, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Approaches
    Cohen, Sarah L.
    Einarsson, Jon I.
    CURRENT OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY REPORTS, 2014, 3 (04): : 277 - 280