Fretting Fatigue Behavior of 304 Austenitic Stainless Steel Considering the Effect of Mean Stress and Tensile Overload

被引:2
|
作者
Jayaprakash, M. [1 ]
Okazaki, M. [1 ]
Miyashita, Y. [1 ]
Otsuka, Y. [2 ]
Mutoh, Y. [2 ]
机构
[1] Nagaoka Univ Technol, Dept Mech Engn, Nagaoka, Niigata, Japan
[2] Nagaoka Univ Technol, Dept Syst Safety, Nagaoka, Niigata, Japan
关键词
Fatigue; Fretting fatigue; Austenitic stainless steel; Mean stress; Tangential stress; Fractography; 304-STAINLESS-STEEL;
D O I
10.1007/s12666-017-1056-3
中图分类号
TF [冶金工业];
学科分类号
0806 ;
摘要
Effect of mean stress on fretting fatigue behavior of 304 austenitic stainless steel has been investigated by conducting fretting fatigue tests at a constant contact pressure of 100 MPa under three different mean stresses i.e., 0, 350 and 450 MPa. For comparisons, plain fatigue tests were also carried out. The influence of tensile overload on fretting fatigue life was also investigated. The results showed that with an increase in mean stress, the reduction in fatigue strength due to fretting increased drastically from 51% at 0 MPa mean stress to 71% at 450 MPa mean stress. The application of tensile overload during fretting fatigue had significant influence on the fretting fatigue lives when the tensile overload was above yield strength. The fretting variables, i.e., tangential stress and relative slip amplitude were measured during fretting fatigue tests. Fracture surfaces were examined using scanning electron microscope. The results have been discussed based on the tangential stress measurement, relative slip amplitude evaluation during fretting fatigue and fracture surface examinations.
引用
收藏
页码:597 / 603
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Fretting fatigue behavior of SUS304 stainless steel under pressurized hot water
    Saengsai, Anchalee
    Otsuka, Yuichi
    Mutoh, Yoshiharu
    TRIBOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 79 : 52 - 58
  • [22] Effect of strain-induced martensite transformation on fatigue behavior of prestrained type 304 austenitic stainless steel
    Nakajima, Masaki
    Uematsu, Yoshihiko
    Akita, Masayuki
    Nihon Kikai Gakkai Ronbunshu, A Hen/Transactions of the Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, Part A, 2009, 75 (759): : 1591 - 1597
  • [23] Fatigue Behavior of Stainless Steel 304L Including Strain Hardening, Prestraining, and Mean Stress Effects
    Colin, Julie
    Fatemi, Ali
    Taheri, Said
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MATERIALS AND TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2010, 132 (02): : 0210081 - 02100813
  • [24] Effect of Constant Cyclic Stress Coupling on the Fatigue Behavior of 304LN Stainless Steel
    Wu, Huanchun
    Liu, Huiqiang
    Xu, Chaoliang
    Jia, Wenqing
    Quan, Qiwei
    Yin, Jian
    Li, Yuanfei
    Jin, Xiao
    Qian, Wangjie
    Dong, Haitao
    Liu, Xiangbing
    MATERIALS, 2024, 17 (21)
  • [25] Role of mean stress on fatigue behavior of a 316L austenitic stainless steel in LWR and air environments
    Chen, W.
    Spätig, P.
    Seifert, H.P.
    International Journal of Fatigue, 2021, 145
  • [26] Role of mean stress on fatigue behavior of a 316L austenitic stainless steel in LWR and air environments
    Chen, W.
    Spatig, P.
    Seifert, H. P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FATIGUE, 2021, 145
  • [27] Quantitative study on the effect of stress magnetization of martensite in 304 austenitic stainless steel
    Lan, Xiwang
    Hu, Bo
    Cheng, Hongzhi
    Luo, Weitao
    Wang, Shaofei
    ENGINEERING FAILURE ANALYSIS, 2022, 138
  • [28] Fatigue behavior of 316L austenitic stainless steel in air and LWR environment with and without mean stress
    Chen, Wen
    Spatig, Philippe
    Seifert, Hans-Peter
    12TH INTERNATIONAL FATIGUE CONGRESS (FATIGUE 2018), 2018, 165
  • [29] The effect of mean stress on the fatigue behavior of 316 LN stainless steel in air and mercury
    Strizak, JP
    Mansur, LK
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MATERIALS, 2003, 318 : 151 - 156
  • [30] Stress Relaxation in Tensile Deformation of 304 Stainless Steel
    Li, Xifeng
    Li, Jiaojiao
    Ding, Wei
    Zhao, Shuangjun
    Chen, Jun
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS ENGINEERING AND PERFORMANCE, 2017, 26 (02) : 630 - 635