Multi-Criteria Decision Making: The Best Choice for the Modeling of Chemicals Against Hyper-Pigmentation?

被引:2
|
作者
Huong Le-Thi-Thu [1 ]
Cruz, Isis Bonet
Marrero-Ponce, Yovani [2 ]
Nam Nguyen-Hai [3 ]
Hai Pham-The [4 ]
Hai Nguyen-Thanh [1 ]
Tung Bui Thanh [1 ]
Casanola-Martin, Gerardo M. [5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Vietnam Natl Univ, Sch Med & Pharm, Hanoi VNU, Hanoi, Vietnam
[2] Univ San Buenaventura, Fac Ciencias Salud, Programa Bacteriol, Grp Invest Microbiol & Ambiente, Cartagena, Bolivar, Colombia
[3] Hanoi Univ Pharm, Dept Pharmaceut Chem, Hanoi, Vietnam
[4] Hanoi Univ Pharm, Dept Pharmacol, Hanoi, Vietnam
[5] Univ Valencia, Dept Bioquim & Biol Mol, E-46100 Burjassot, Spain
[6] Pontificia Univ Catolica Ecuador Sede Esmeraldas, Escuela Licenciatura Gest Ambiental, Esmeraldas, Ecuador
[7] Univ Estatal Amazon, Fac Ingn Ambiental, Puyo, Ecuador
关键词
Depigmenting agent; machine learning technique; multi-classifier system; QSAR model; virtual screening; TYROSINASE INHIBITORS; QUADRATIC INDEXES; ATOM; DESCRIPTORS; DIVERSITY; ENSEMBLES; DISCOVERY; SELECTION; FUSION;
D O I
10.2174/1574893610666151008011245
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Classifier ensembles appeared to be powerful alternative for handling a difficult problem. It is rapidly growing and enjoying many attentions from pattern recognition and machine learning communities. In the present report, the potential of multi-criteria decision making via multiclassifier approaches is assessed by applying them in the modeling of chemicals against hyper-pigmentation. TOMOCOMD-CARDD atom-based quadratic indices are used as descriptors to parameterize the molecular structures. Support vector machine, artificial neural network, Bayesian network, binary logistic regression, instance-based learning and tree classification applied on two collected datasets are explored as standalone classifiers. Prediction sets (PSs) are used to assess the performance of multiclassifier systems (MCSs). A strategy exploiting the principal component analysis together with pairwise diversity measures is designed to select the most diverse base classifiers to combine. Various trainable and nontrainable systems are developed that aggregate, at the abstract and continuous levels, the outputs of base classifiers. The obtained results are rather encouraging since the MCSs generally enhance the performance of the base classifiers; e.g. the best MCS obtains global accuracy of 95.51%, 88.89% in the PS for the data I and II in regard to 94.12% and 85.93% of best individual classifier, respectively. Our results suggest that the MCSs could be the best choice till the moment to obtain suitable QSAR models for the prediction of depigmenting agents. Finally, we consider these approaches will aid improving the virtual screening procedures and increasing the practicality of data mining of chemical datasets for the discovery of novel lead compounds.
引用
收藏
页码:520 / 532
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] SYSTEMATIC DECISION MAKING: A EXTENDED MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING MODEL
    Yu, Xiaohan
    Xu, Zeshui
    Hu, Junquan
    Liu, Shousheng
    TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY, 2017, 23 (01) : 157 - 177
  • [22] Methodological foundations of multi-criteria decision making
    Ogryczak, W
    Vetschera, R
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2004, 158 (02) : 267 - 270
  • [23] Semantic Multi-Criteria Decision Making SeMCDM
    Mahmoudi, Ghadi
    Mueller-Schloer, Christian
    MCDM: 2009 IEEE SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE IN MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING, 2009, : 149 - 156
  • [24] Mutually Dependent Multi-criteria Decision Making
    Dalalah, Doraid
    Al-Tahat, Mohammad
    Bataineh, Khaled
    FUZZY INFORMATION AND ENGINEERING, 2012, 4 (02) : 195 - 216
  • [25] SUBJECTIVE MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING
    ESHRAGH, F
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MAN-MACHINE STUDIES, 1980, 13 (01): : 117 - 141
  • [26] FUZZY MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING ALGORITHMS
    Peneva, Vania
    Popchev, Ivan
    COMPTES RENDUS DE L ACADEMIE BULGARE DES SCIENCES, 2010, 63 (07): : 979 - 992
  • [27] Visual support for multi-criteria decision making
    Laine, T.
    Forns-Samso, F.
    Kukkonen, V.
    EWORK AND EBUSINESS IN ARCHITECTURE, ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION, 2016, : 371 - 376
  • [28] TOPSIS in Multi-Criteria Decision Making: A Survey
    Panda, Monalisa
    Jagadev, Alok Kumar
    2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DATA SCIENCE AND BUSINESS ANALYTICS (ICDSBA 2018), 2018, : 51 - 54
  • [29] Fuzzy Measures in Multi-Criteria Decision Making
    Yager, Ronald R.
    Alajlan, Naif
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFT COMPUTING AND SOFTWARE ENGINEERING (SCSE'15), 2015, 62 : 107 - 115
  • [30] Groundwater Assessment Multi-criteria decision making
    Tanti, Kamal Kumar
    Singh, Prashant
    Roy, Swarnendu
    Chetia, Monisha
    Machahary, Ratamali
    Jhariya, Dalchand
    Chanu, Tongbram Malemnganbi
    Bora, Porag
    Gogoi, Priti Rekha
    Sah, Puja
    CURRENT SCIENCE, 2020, 118 (05): : 693 - 693