Assessing the water and carbon footprint of hydropower stations at a national scale

被引:29
|
作者
Wang, Jinyan [1 ]
Chen, Xiuzhi [1 ]
Liu, Zhongwei [3 ]
Frans, Veronica F. [2 ]
Xu, Zhenci [2 ]
Qiu, Xinjiao [4 ]
Xu, Feipeng [1 ]
Li, Yunkai [1 ]
机构
[1] China Agr Univ, Coll Water Resources & Civil Engn, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[2] Michigan State Univ, Ctr Syst Integrat & Sustainabil, Dept Fisheries & Wildlife, E Lansing, MI 48823 USA
[3] China Inst Water Resources & Hydropower Res IWHR, Div Mat, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Construct Management & Qual Safety Ctr, Water Resources Dept, Beijing 100038, Haidian, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Water-energy-CO2; nexus; Footprint; Environmental impact assessment; Life Cycle Assessment; China; Reservoir; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; RIVER-BASIN; ENERGY USE; IMPACTS; CLIMATE; SUSTAINABILITY; CONSEQUENCES; UNCERTAINTY; ELECTRICITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.148
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Hydropower is among the most widely-adopted renewable energy sources worldwide. Its development has, however, led to environmental impacts such as carbon emissions and water loss. To elate, the water footprint (WF) and carbon footprint (CF) of hydropower stations have been assessed, but not simultaneously or at a large scale such as national scale. Previous WF and CF studies rarely assessed all life-cycle stages of a hydropower station, calling for a more holistic understanding of the environmental impacts of hydropower. We developed a complete WF and CF assessment method and applied it to a case study on 50 of China's most influential hydropower stations, representing over 80% of the country's total hydropower. The total annual WF of these hydropower stations was 5.50 x 10(11) m(3), equal to 18.9% of Yellow River's annual runoff. The total CF of these stations was 1.06 x 10(7) tCO(2)e, with extremely large variations found, ranging from 1850 to 1.56 x 10(6) tCO(2)e. This study provides the first environmental impact assessment to simultaneously include the WF and CF of multiple influential hydropower stations at a national scale. We were able to show spatial variations in their environmental impacts from different life-cycle stages of the hydropower station. Most of the WF was due to surface water loss from reservoirs, while most of the CF was derived from the operational and maintenance stage of these stations. This initial WF and CF assessment of hydropower at a national scale provides insights for water resource management and carbon reduction during hydropower development. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:595 / 612
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaporation from Camargos hydropower plant reservoir: water footprint characterization
    Bueno, Eduardo de Oliveira
    de Mello, Carlos Rogerio
    Alves, Geovane Junqueira
    RBRH-REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE RECURSOS HIDRICOS, 2016, 21 (03):
  • [32] The Water Footprint of Hydropower Production-State of the Art and Methodological Challenges
    Bakken, Tor Haakon
    Killingtveit, Anund
    Alfredsen, Knut
    GLOBAL CHALLENGES, 2017, 1 (05)
  • [33] The water footprint from hydroelectricity: a case study for a hydropower plant in Romania
    Robescu, Lacramioara Diana
    Bondrea, Dana Andreya
    SUSTAINABLE SOLUTIONS FOR ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT (EENVIRO 2018), 2019, 85
  • [34] Assessing variation and driving factors of the county-scale water footprint for soybean production in China
    Zhao, Jiongchao
    Han, Tong
    Wang, Chong
    Shi, Xiaoyu
    Wang, Kaicheng
    Zhao, Mingyu
    Chen, Fu
    Chu, Qingquan
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2022, 263
  • [35] Water footprint and consumption of hydropower from basin-constrained water mass balance
    Sun, Lian
    Cai, Yanpeng
    Chen, Aifang
    Zamora, David
    Jaramillo, Fernando
    ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 2021, 153
  • [36] Development of Method for Assessing Water Footprint Sustainability
    Xu, Ziyao
    Lian, Jijian
    Wang, Ran
    Qiu, Ying
    Song, Tianhua
    Hua, Kaixun
    WATER, 2022, 14 (05)
  • [37] WATER FOOTPRINT, CARBON FOOTPRINT, ENERGY FOOTPRINT GENERAL ASPECTS AND THEIR INFLUENCE ON SOCIETY
    Pisleaga, Mihaela
    Girbaciu, Alina
    Girbaciu, Cristian
    ECOLOGY, ECONOMICS, EDUCATION AND LEGISLATION, VOL I, 2015, : 1039 - 1045
  • [38] Estimating the national carbon footprint of inhalers in healthcare
    Sean Owens
    Kevin Morris
    Eimir Hurley
    Katherine O’Reilly
    Johanna O’Callaghan
    John Allman
    Diarmid Linehan
    Mary McDonald
    Sandra Green
    Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -), 2023, 192 : 2251 - 2253
  • [39] Application of data quality indicator of carbon footprint and water footprint
    Tsai Chi Kuo
    Miao-Ling Huang
    Chia Wei Hsu
    Chiuhsiang Joe Lin
    Chih-Chun Hsieh
    Chih-Hsing Chu
    International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, 2015, 2 : 43 - 50
  • [40] Agricultural water and carbon footprint driving mechanisms at the household scale in North China Plain
    Wang, Pengxiang
    Chen, Xiuzhi
    Shi, Ze
    Kasmu, Xiaokaitijiang
    Li, Yunkai
    WATER AND ENVIRONMENT JOURNAL, 2020, 34 (S1) : 216 - 228