On the performance of a baffled glazed-bladed entrance solar air heater

被引:35
|
作者
Kabeel, A. E. [1 ]
Hamed, Mofreh. H. [2 ,3 ]
Omara, Z. M. [2 ]
Kandel, A. W. [2 ]
机构
[1] Tanta Univ, Fac Engn, Tanta, Egypt
[2] Kafrelsheikh Univ, Fac Engn, Kafr Al Sheikh, Egypt
[3] Higher Inst Engn & Technol, Kafrelsheikh, Egypt
关键词
Solar air heater; Entrance region; Baffles; Guide blades; Thermal efficiency; PHASE-CHANGE MATERIAL; THERMAL PERFORMANCE; ABSORBER PLATE; FLAT-PLATE; FRICTION FACTOR; FLUID-FLOW; THERMOHYDRAULIC PERFORMANCE; TRANSFER AUGMENTATION; LONGITUDINAL FINS; ENERGY-STORAGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.04.141
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
The performance of a baffled glazed-bladed entrance air heater (BGBSAH) was experimentally investigated and compared with a conventional one at the same operating conditions. The solar air heater was modified at the entrance region. This region was covered with a glass coverinstead of a steel one to increase the heating area exposed to solar radiation (I-R). In addition, the entrance region was boosted by guide blades to affirm a good air distribution inside the heater. Baffles attached to nineteen longitudinal fins were fixed inside the heater. These baffles were used to increase the heat transfer area, the length of air flow path, and the heat capacity of SAH via increasing the mass of the material. Three various numbers of baffles (170, 410 and 800) were used. Moreover, four values of air flow rates ranged from 0.013 to 0.04 kg/s were investigated. The results showed that, at the same mass flow rate, the performance of SAH was directly proportional to the baffles number. In addition, the results revealed that the maximum daily temperature difference obtained from the BGBSAH with 800 baffles was 51.9 degrees C compared to 22.7 degrees C for the conventional one at 0.013 kg/s. Besides, the daily efficiency was improved by 29.91-51.69% in case of BGBSAH with 800 baffles compared to the conventional one. For conventional SAH the average cost per kW is 0.0146 $ while for BGBSAH are 0.00733, 0.00787 and 0.0084 $ for 800, 410 and 170 baffles, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:367 / 375
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Performance assessment of facade integrated glazed air solar thermal collectors
    Garay Martinez, Roberto
    Astudillo Larraz, Julen
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE - ALTERNATIVE AND RENEWABLE ENERGY QUEST (AREQ 2017), 2017, 115 : 353 - 360
  • [32] Experimental Study of the Slit Spacing and Bed Height on the Thermal Performance of Slit-Glazed Solar Air Heater (vol 2017, 9851376, 2017)
    Mousavi, Seyed Mahdi Taheri
    Egelioglu, Fuat
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHOTOENERGY, 2017, 2017
  • [33] COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS STUDY OF THE PERFORMANCE OF SOLAR AIR HEATER
    Ames, Kieran
    McCarthy, Chris
    Clark, Ian
    Weathers, Justin
    Mastrandrea, Kyle
    Tudor, Timothy
    Etesami, Faryar
    Zhu, Xiaowei
    PROCEEDINGS OF ASME 2023 INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL ENGINEERING CONGRESS AND EXPOSITION, IMECE2023, VOL 7, 2023,
  • [34] A numerical study of the double-glazed solar air heater (DG-SAH) performance using optimized gas-filled interspaces
    Bennour, Fethi
    Mzad, Hocine
    CASE STUDIES IN THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 40
  • [35] THEORY OF BAFFLED SOLAR AIR HEATERS
    YEH, HM
    ENERGY, 1992, 17 (07) : 697 - 702
  • [36] THERMAL PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT OF ARTIFICIALLY ROUGHENED SOLAR AIR HEATER
    Bader, Nabaa M.
    Mushatet, Khudheyer S.
    ENGINEERING REVIEW, 2023, 43 (01) : 66 - 81
  • [37] Exergetic performance evaluation and parametric studies of solar air heater
    Gupta, M. K.
    Kaushik, S. C.
    ENERGY, 2008, 33 (11) : 1691 - 1702
  • [38] Thermal performance investigation of frustum roughened solar air heater
    Singh, Dharam
    Kumar, Vikash
    SOLAR ENERGY, 2023, 255 : 339 - 354
  • [39] Design and thermal performance evaluation of a novel solar air heater
    Saxena, Abhishek
    Srivastava, Ghanshyam
    Tirth, Vineet
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2015, 77 : 501 - 511
  • [40] Thermal performance evaluation of a solar air heater with rotating turbulators
    Singh, Sarvapriya
    Mitra, Santanu
    Kumar, Manish
    Suman, Siddharth
    SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES AND ASSESSMENTS, 2021, 48