Grey Box Identification in Closed-loop

被引:1
|
作者
Niemann, Henrik [1 ]
Miklos, Robert [1 ,2 ]
Poulsen, Niels Kjolstad [3 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Elect Engn Automat & Control, Build 326, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
[2] GEA Proc Engn AS, Soborg, Denmark
[3] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Appl Math & Comp Sci, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
关键词
Coprime factorization; closed-loop system identification; grey box models; feedback controllers; UNCERTAINTY;
D O I
10.23919/acc.2019.8814460
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The focus in this paper is identification of parameters in closed-loop systems. The system identification approach is based on a reformulation of feedback controllers in terms of its coprime factors. Based on this controller architecture, an auxiliary input is injected into the controller for the identification. The result of this setup is that the closed-loop identification problem is transformed into a standard open-loop identification problem. The models with unknown parameters are given in the form of a linear fractional transformation (LFT) where the direct term gives the nominal system and the other part gives the nonlinear maps of the variation of the unknown parameters into the system. Further, the coprime factors of this system can again be described as LFT of the nominal coprime factors and the parameter variations, i.e. an open-loop LFT identification problem.
引用
收藏
页码:4990 / 4995
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Closed-loop Subspace Identification Based on KPLS
    Lin Wen-yi
    Gu Yong
    Xie Lei
    2013 32ND CHINESE CONTROL CONFERENCE (CCC), 2013, : 1843 - 1848
  • [32] PLANT IDENTIFICATION IN A STOCHASTIC CLOSED-LOOP SYSTEM
    VORCHIK, VG
    AUTOMATION AND REMOTE CONTROL, 1975, 36 (04) : 550 - 565
  • [33] Closed-loop System Identification with New Sensors
    Bendtsen, Jan
    Trangbaek, Klaus
    Stoustrup, Jakob
    47TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL, 2008 (CDC 2008), 2008, : 2631 - 2636
  • [34] Closed-loop identification with application to a chemical reactor
    Mikles, J
    Cirka, L
    Kozka, S
    DYNAMICS & CONTROL OF PROCESS SYSTEMS 1998, VOLUMES 1 AND 2, 1999, : 235 - 240
  • [35] Optimal input design for identification in closed-loop
    Bányász, CS
    Keviczky, L
    ROBOTICS, AUTOMATION AND CONTROL AND MANUFACTURING: TRENDS, PRINCIPLES AND APPLICATIONS, 2002, 14 : 155 - 162
  • [36] ALGORITHM FOR IDENTIFICATION OF CLOSED-LOOP PROCESSES.
    Madjarov, N.E.
    Maleshkov, S.B.
    Ganev, P.G.
    Sulemezova, N.S.
    Systems Science, 1983, 9 (04): : 5 - 18
  • [37] MPC closed-loop identification without excitation
    Zhu, Yun
    Yan, Wengang
    Zhu, Yucai
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2020, 53 (02): : 895 - 900
  • [38] Variance results for closed-loop identification methods
    Ljung, L
    Forssell, U
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 36TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL, VOLS 1-5, 1997, : 2435 - 2440
  • [39] Case studies on closed-loop identification for MPC
    Zhu, YC
    Butoyi, F
    CONTROL ENGINEERING PRACTICE, 2002, 10 (04) : 403 - 417
  • [40] Asymptotic variance expressions for closed-loop identification
    Gevers, M
    Ljung, L
    Van den Hof, P
    AUTOMATICA, 2001, 37 (05) : 781 - 786