A comparison of mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic upflow filters

被引:37
|
作者
Ahn, JH [1 ]
Forster, CF [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Sch Civil Engn, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
关键词
anaerobic digestion; mesophilic; thermophilic; performance;
D O I
10.1016/S0960-8524(99)00177-7
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
Two anaerobic filters, one mesophilic (35 degrees C) and one thermophilic (55 degrees C), were operated with a starch-based feed at a series of organic loading rates. At loading rates up to 8.3 kg COD m(-3) d(-1), there was no difference in the performance of the two types of reactor, measured in terms of the removal of soluble COD (SCOD) and gas production. At the higher loading rates of 12.4 and 17 kg COD m(-3) d(-1), the thermophilic filter gave the better performance; a SCOD removal of 93% compared to 78% at the former loading rate and one of 88% compared to 55% at the latter one. The daily methane production from the mesophilic digester was also lower; 3.19 ld(-1) compared to 4.98 ld(-1) for the thermophilic digester at the loading rate of 12.4 kg COD m(-3) d(-1) and 2.24 ld(-1) compared to 6.18 ld(-1) at the loading rate of 17 kg COD m-3 d(-1). The volatile fatty acid concentration in the effluent from the mesophilic filter also increased from <50 mg acetate 1(-1) to 254 and 464 mg acetate 1(-1) at the two higher loading rates. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 205
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Upflow anaerobic solid-state (UASS) digestion of horse manure: Thermophilic vs. mesophilic performance
    Boeske, Janina
    Wirth, Benjamin
    Garlipp, Felix
    Mumme, Jan
    Van den Weghe, Herman
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 175 : 8 - 16
  • [22] HYDRAULIC CHARACTERISTICS OF UPFLOW ANAEROBIC FILTERS
    YOUNG, HW
    YOUNG, JC
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1988, 114 (03): : 621 - 638
  • [23] Comparison of Heavy Metal Speciation of Sludge During Mesophilic and Thermophilic Anaerobic Digestion
    Tianfeng Wang
    Ziyu Tang
    Yandong Guo
    Xinyun Zhang
    Qiyong Yang
    Bingjie Xu
    Huijuan Wang
    Waste and Biomass Valorization, 2020, 11 : 2651 - 2660
  • [24] Comparison of Single-stage Thermophilic and Mesophilic Anaerobic Sewage Sludge Digestion
    Jang, Hyun Min
    Choi, Suk Soon
    Ha, Jeong Hyub
    APPLIED CHEMISTRY FOR ENGINEERING, 2016, 27 (05): : 532 - 536
  • [25] THERMOPHILIC AND MESOPHILIC ANAEROBIC FERMENTATION OF SWINE MANURE
    HASHIMOTO, AG
    AGRICULTURAL WASTES, 1983, 6 (03): : 175 - 191
  • [26] Comparison of mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic hydrogen production by hot spring enrichment culture
    Puhakka, Jaakko A.
    Karadag, Dogan
    Nissila, Marika E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2012, 37 (21) : 16453 - 16459
  • [27] Comparison of Heavy Metal Speciation of Sludge During Mesophilic and Thermophilic Anaerobic Digestion
    Wang, Tianfeng
    Tang, Ziyu
    Guo, Yandong
    Zhang, Xinyun
    Yang, Qiyong
    Xu, Bingjie
    Wang, Huijuan
    WASTE AND BIOMASS VALORIZATION, 2020, 11 (06) : 2651 - 2660
  • [28] Aerobic thermophilic and anaerobic mesophilic treatment of sludge
    Cheunbarn, T
    Pagilla, KR
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 2000, 126 (09): : 790 - 795
  • [29] Anaerobic mesophilic and thermophilic municipal sludge digestion
    de la Rubia, MA
    Perez, M
    Romero, LI
    Sales, D
    CHEMICAL AND BIOCHEMICAL ENGINEERING QUARTERLY, 2002, 16 (03) : 119 - 124
  • [30] The effect of temperature variations on the performance of mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic filters treating a simulated papermill wastewater
    Ahn, JH
    Forster, CF
    PROCESS BIOCHEMISTRY, 2002, 37 (06) : 589 - 594