A screening-level assessment of the health risks of chronic smoke exposure for wildland firefighters

被引:47
|
作者
Booze, TF
Reinhardt, TE
Quiring, SJ
Ottmar, RD
机构
[1] URS Corp, Seattle, WA 98101 USA
[2] Calif Dept Tox Subst Control, Sacramento, CA USA
[3] US Forest Serv, Pacific NW Res Stn, USDA, Seattle, WA USA
关键词
cancer; firefighters; health; risk assessment; smoke exposure;
D O I
10.1080/15459620490442500
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A screening health risk assessment was performed to assess the upper-bound risks of cancer and noncancer adverse health effects among wildland firefighters peforming wildfire suppression and prescribed burn management. Of the hundreds of chemicals in wildland fire smoke, we identified 15 substances of potential concern from the standpoints of concentration and toxicology; these included aldehydes, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide, benzene, and respirable particulate matter. Data defining daily exposures to smoke. at prescribed burns and wildfires, potential days of exposure in a year, and career lengths were used to estimate average and reasonable maximum career inhalation exposures to these substances. Of the 15 substances in smoke that were evaluated, only benzene and formaldehyde posed a cancer risk greater than I per million, while only acrolein and respirable particulate matter exposures resulted in hazard indices greater than 1.0. The estimated upper-bound cancer risks ranged from 1.4 to 220 excess cancers per million, and noncancer hazard indices ranged from 9 to 360, depending on the exposure group. These values only indicate the likelihood of adverse health effects, not whether they will or will not occur. The risk assessment process narrows the field of substances that deserve further assessment, and the hazards identified by risk assessment generally agree with those identified as a concern in occupational exposure assessments.
引用
收藏
页码:296 / 305
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Application of a Screening-Level Pollinator Risk Assessment Framework to Trisiloxane Polyether Surfactants
    Collins, Jennifer K.
    Jackson, Jennifer M.
    ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 2022, 41 (12) : 3084 - 3094
  • [42] Integrating economic input–output life cycle assessment with risk assessment for a screening-level analysis
    Heather E. Wright
    Qiong Zhang
    James R. Mihelcic
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2008, 13 : 412 - 420
  • [43] A disease-specific screening-level modeling approach for assessing the cancer risks of pesticide mixtures
    Li, Zijian
    CHEMOSPHERE, 2022, 286
  • [44] An examination of silver nanoparticles in socks using screening-level life cycle assessment
    David E. Meyer
    Mary Ann Curran
    Michael A. Gonzalez
    Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 2011, 13 : 147 - 156
  • [45] A screening-level risk assessment approach for evaluating interactions in chemical mixtures.
    Price, K
    Krishnan, K
    TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2003, 72 : 137 - 137
  • [46] Screening-Level Microbial Risk Assessment of Urban Water Locations: A Tool for Prioritization
    Sales-Ortells, Helena
    Medema, Gertjan
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 48 (16) : 9780 - 9789
  • [47] Firefighters' occupational exposure: Contribution from biomarkers of effect to assess health risks
    Barros, Bela
    Oliveira, Marta
    Morais, Simone
    ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 156 (156)
  • [48] Macrocyclic fragrance materials-A screening-level environmental assessment using chemical categorization
    Salvito, Daniel
    Lapczynski, Aurelia
    Sachse-Vasquez, Christen
    McIntosh, Colin
    Calow, Peter
    Greim, Helmut
    Escher, Beate
    ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY, 2011, 74 (06) : 1619 - 1629
  • [49] Potential importance of inhalation exposures for wildlife using screening-level ecological risk assessment
    Archbold, Josephine A.
    Hull, Ruth N.
    Diamond, Miriam
    HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 2007, 13 (04): : 870 - 883
  • [50] Is There a Residual and Hidden Potential for Small and Micro Hydropower in Europe? A Screening-Level Regional Assessment
    Emanuele Quaranta
    Katalin Bódis
    Egidijus Kasiulis
    Aonghus McNabola
    Alberto Pistocchi
    Water Resources Management, 2022, 36 : 1745 - 1762