PROPERTY RIGHTS AND LOSS AVERSION IN CONTESTS

被引:25
|
作者
Chowdhury, Subhasish M. [1 ]
Jeon, Joo Young [2 ]
Ramalingam, Abhijit [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bath, Dept Econ, Bath BA2 7AY, Avon, England
[2] Univ Reading, Dept Econ, Reading RG6 6AA, Berks, England
[3] Univ East Anglia, Sch Econ, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
[4] Univ East Anglia, Ctr Behav & Expt Social Sci, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
关键词
PARASITOID WASP; PROSPECT-THEORY; RENT-SEEKING; CONFLICT; COOPERATION; TOURNAMENTS; PREFERENCES; COMPETITION; RISK; BIAS;
D O I
10.1111/ecin.12505
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We analyze the effects of property rights and the resulting loss aversion on contest outcomes. We study three situations: in gain two players start with no prize and make sunk bids to win a prize; in loss both the players start with prizes and whoever loses the contest loses their prize; and in mixed only one player starts with a prize that stays with him if he wins, but is transferred to the rival otherwise. Since the differences among the treatments arise only from framing, the expected utility and the standard loss aversion models predict no difference in bids across treatments. We introduce a loss aversion model in which the property rights are made salient, and as a result the reference point varies across treatments. This model predicts average bids in descending order in the loss, the mixed, and the gain treatment; and higher bids by the player with property rights in the mixed treatment. The results from a laboratory experiment broadly support these predictions. There is no significant difference in bids in the loss (gain) treatment and bids by property rights holder (nonholder) in the mixed treatment. A model incorporating both loss aversion and social preferences explains this result. (JEL C91, C72, D23, D74)
引用
收藏
页码:1492 / 1511
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] EXAMINING LOSS AVERSION FOR QUALITY VERSUS LOSS AVERSION FOR PRICE
    Sivakumar, K.
    JOURNAL OF MARKETING THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2011, 19 (03) : 317 - 324
  • [22] Endowment Effects in Proposal Rights Contests
    Hahn, Youjin
    Kim, Chulyoung
    Kim, Sang-Hyun
    JOURNAL OF INSTITUTIONAL AND THEORETICAL ECONOMICS-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR DIE GESAMTE STAATSWISSENSCHAFT, 2021, 177 (04): : 449 - 476
  • [23] "To Own or Not to Own?" A Study on the Determinants and Consequences of Alternative Intellectual Property Rights Arrangements in Crowdsourcing for Innovation Contests
    Mazzola, Erica
    Acur, Nuran
    Piazza, Mariangela
    Perrone, Giovanni
    JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2018, 35 (06) : 908 - 929
  • [24] Using contests to allocate pollution rights
    MacKenzie, Ian A.
    Hanley, Nick
    Kornienko, Tatiana
    ENERGY POLICY, 2009, 37 (07) : 2798 - 2806
  • [25] Biodiversity Loss, Viewed Through the Lens of Mismatched Property Rights
    Facemire, Challie
    Bradshaw, Karen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE COMMONS, 2020, 14 (01): : 650 - 661
  • [26] Constant risk aversion in stochastic contests with exponential completion times
    Canbolat, Pelin G.
    Rothblum, Uriel G.
    NAVAL RESEARCH LOGISTICS, 2019, 66 (01) : 4 - 14
  • [27] Risk Aversion, Loss Aversion, and the Demand for Insurance
    Eeckhoudt, Louis
    Fiori, Anna Maria
    Gianin, Emanuela Rosazza
    RISKS, 2018, 6 (02)
  • [28] The boundaries of loss aversion
    Novemsky, N
    Kahneman, D
    JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2005, 42 (02) : 119 - 128
  • [29] Loss Aversion in Politics
    Alesina, Alberto
    Passarelli, Francesco
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 63 (04) : 936 - 947
  • [30] On probabilities and loss aversion
    Zank, Horst
    THEORY AND DECISION, 2010, 68 (03) : 243 - 261