Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms for Shelter Animal Classification

被引:0
|
作者
Mitrovic, Katarina [1 ]
Milosevic, Danijela [1 ]
Greconici, Marian [2 ]
机构
[1] Fac Tech Sci, Dept Informat Technol, Cacak, Serbia
[2] Politehn Univ Timisoara, Fundamental Phys Engineers D, Timisoara, Romania
来源
IEEE 13TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON APPLIED COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND INFORMATICS (SACI 2019) | 2019年
关键词
Machine Learning; Support Vector Machines; K-Nearest Neighbors; C4.5; Random Forest; Naive Bayes;
D O I
10.1109/saci46893.2019.9111575
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Establishing characteristics of the shelter animal which determine its outcome is an important task for solving the problem of homeless and abused animals. The main goal of this research was to identify which machine learning algorithm can provide the most accurate prediction of the outcome for an animal, based on its main features. The first step in this research was the transformation of data into a proper form for the implementation of the algorithms. Furthermore, several machine learning algorithms were trained in order to achieve the best possible classification results. The results of the algorithms were compared and the most suitable algorithms were selected based on their performance metrics. This research proposes using a combination of multiple data preprocessing techniques, imbalanced data and machine learning algorithms for predicting the outcome for shelter animal based on its characteristics. K-Nearest Neighbors and C4.5 algorithms provided the best classification results in this research.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 216
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms for Classification of the Sentences in Three Clinical Practice Guidelines
    Song, Mi Hwa
    Lee, Young Ho
    Kang, Un Gu
    HEALTHCARE INFORMATICS RESEARCH, 2013, 19 (01) : 16 - 24
  • [22] Classification Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms Using Two Independent CAD Datasets
    Yuvali, Meliz
    Yaman, Belma
    Tosun, Oezguer
    MATHEMATICS, 2022, 10 (03)
  • [23] Comparison of different Machine Learning algorithms for lithofacies classification from well logs
    Dell'Aversana, P.
    BOLLETTINO DI GEOFISICA TEORICA ED APPLICATA, 2019, 60 (01) : 69 - 80
  • [24] Comparison of Different Classification Algorithms for Prediction of Heart Disease by Machine Learning Techniques
    Harshitha B.
    Maria Rufina P.
    Shilpa B.L.
    SN Computer Science, 4 (2)
  • [25] Performance Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms for Imbalanced Class Classification in Hydraulic System
    Joo, Yohan
    Kim, Kyutae
    Jeong, Jongpil
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2020 14TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON UBIQUITOUS INFORMATION MANAGEMENT AND COMMUNICATION (IMCOM), 2020,
  • [26] Comparison of the machine learning algorithms for traffic classification in 5G network
    Globa, Larysa
    Astrakhantsev, Andrii
    Tsukanov, Serhii
    2024 IEEE INTERNATIONAL BLACK SEA CONFERENCE ON COMMUNICATIONS AND NETWORKING, BLACKSEACOM 2024, 2024, : 125 - 130
  • [27] A Review of Machine Learning Algorithms for Text Classification
    Li, Ruiguang
    Liu, Ming
    Xu, Dawei
    Gao, Jiaqi
    Wu, Fudong
    Zhu, Liehuang
    CYBER SECURITY, CNCERT 2021, 2022, 1506 : 226 - 234
  • [28] Petrofacies classification using machine learning algorithms
    Silva, Adrielle A.
    Tavares, Monica W.
    Carrasquilla, Abel
    Missagia, Roseane
    Ceia, Marco
    GEOPHYSICS, 2020, 85 (04) : WA101 - WA113
  • [29] Classification of water subscribers by machine learning algorithms
    Dahesh, Arezoo
    Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, Reza
    Tajally, AmirReza
    Erfani-Jazi, Aseman
    Babazadeh-Behestani, Milad
    WATER AND ENVIRONMENT JOURNAL, 2024, 38 (01) : 45 - 58
  • [30] Malware Detection and Classification with Machine Learning Algorithms
    Kumar, R. Vinoth
    Islam, Md Mojahidul
    Apon, Abir Hossain
    Prantha, C. S.
    SMART TRENDS IN COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATIONS, VOL 5, SMARTCOM 2024, 2024, 949 : 143 - 158