The Role of Social Cues for Goal Disambiguation in Human-Robot Cooperation

被引:0
|
作者
Vinanzi, Samuele [1 ]
Cangelosi, Angelo [1 ,2 ]
Goerick, Christian [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Cognit Robot Lab, Manchester, Lancs, England
[2] AIST AIRC, Tokyo, Italy
[3] Honda Res Inst Europe GmbH, Offenbach, Germany
关键词
intention reading; social cues; clustering; cognitive robotics; human-robot interaction; INTENTIONS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Social interaction is the new frontier in contemporary robotics: we want to build robots that blend with ease into our daily social environments, following their norms and rules. The cognitive skill that bootstraps social awareness in humans is known as "intention reading" and it allows us to interpret other agents' actions and assign them meaning. Given its centrality for humans, it is likely that intention reading will foster the development of robotic social understanding. In this paper, we present an artificial cognitive architecture for intention reading in human-robot interaction (HRI) that makes use of social cues to disambiguate goals. This is accomplished by performing a low-level action encoding paired with a high-level probabilistic goal inference. We introduce a new clustering algorithm that has been developed to differentiate multi-sensory human social cues by performing several levels of clustering on different feature spaces, paired with a Bayesian network that infers the underlying intention. The model has been validated through an interactive HRI experiment involving a joint manipulation game performed by a human and a robotic arm in a toy block scenario. The results show that the artificial agent was capable of reading the intention of its partner and cooperate in mutual interaction, thus validating the novel methodology and the use of social cues to disambiguate goals, other than demonstrating the advantages of intention reading in social HRI.
引用
收藏
页码:971 / 977
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Stress detection for implicit human-robot cooperation
    Sims, J
    Vashishtha, D
    Rani, P
    Brackin, R
    Sarkar, N
    ROBOTICS, AUTOMATION AND CONTROL AND MANUFACTURING: TRENDS, PRINCIPLES AND APPLICATIONS, 2002, 14 : 567 - 572
  • [22] A novel approach to proactive human-robot cooperation
    Schrempf, OC
    Hanebeck, UD
    Schmid, AJ
    Wörn, H
    2005 IEEE INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON ROBOT AND HUMAN INTERACTIVE COMMUNICATION (RO-MAN), 2005, : 555 - 560
  • [23] HUMAN-ROBOT COOPERATION BASED ON VISUAL COMMUNICATION
    Tan, Joo Kooi
    Sato, Akitoshi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE COMPUTING INFORMATION AND CONTROL, 2020, 16 (02): : 543 - 554
  • [24] A Hierarchical Architecture for Human-Robot Cooperation Processes
    Darvish, Kourosh
    Simetti, Enrico
    Mastrogiovanni, Fulvio
    Casalino, Giuseppe
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ROBOTICS, 2021, 37 (02) : 567 - 586
  • [25] Safe human-robot cooperation in industrial production
    Heiligensetzer, P.
    Wörn, H.
    VDI Berichte, 2002, (1679): : 197 - 204
  • [26] Manipulator performance constraints in human-robot cooperation
    Dimeas, Fotios
    Moulianitis, Vassilis C.
    Aspragathos, Nikos
    ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER-INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING, 2018, 50 : 222 - 233
  • [27] Safe Human-Robot Cooperation in an Industrial Environment
    Pedrocchi, Nicola
    Vicentini, Federico
    Malosio, Matteo
    Tosatti, Lorenzo Molinari
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED ROBOTIC SYSTEMS, 2013, 10
  • [28] Investigation of Screw Fastening by Human-Robot Cooperation
    Inamura, Kazuhiro
    Iwasaki, Kenta
    Kunimura, Ryosuke
    Hamasaki, Shunsuke
    Osumi, Hisashi
    2023 IEEE/SICE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SYSTEM INTEGRATION, SII, 2023,
  • [29] Investigating human-robot cooperation in a hospital environment
    Tornbjerg, Kristina
    Kanstrup, Anne Marie
    Skov, Mikael B.
    Rehm, Matthias
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2021 ACM DESIGNING INTERACTIVE SYSTEMS CONFERENCE (DIS 2021), 2021, : 381 - 391
  • [30] Robot-robot and human-robot cooperation in commercial robotics applications
    Koeppe, R
    Engelhardt, D
    Hagenauer, A
    Heiligensetzer, P
    Kneifel, B
    Knipfer, A
    Stoddard, K
    Robotics Research, 2005, 15 : 202 - 216