On Exploration of University Supervisors in the Evaluation of Classroom Teaching Quality

被引:0
|
作者
Li, Ye [1 ]
Dai, Qing-hui [1 ]
机构
[1] North China Elect Power Univ, Baoding, Peoples R China
关键词
Classroom teaching quality; Evaluation; Teaching supervisors; Teaching philosophy; Evaluation index system;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Classroom teaching quality is directly related to the quality of personnel training. Evaluation of classroom teaching quality is an important part of the daily work of teaching supervisors. This paper summarizes the six years' work of a university supervisors group in the evaluation of classroom teaching quality. The university has constructed the evaluation system which includes the evaluation of three parties: the students, the experts of the department and the school supervisors. The supervisors group revised the evaluation index system: the original evaluation index system consisted of five sub-components: teaching attitude, teaching contents, teaching methods, teaching means and teaching effects. The evaluation results were divided into five levels. The new evaluation index system consists of one overall evaluation, three sub evaluations and evaluation reason, the classroom evaluation results are divided into four levels. The revision of the evaluation index system established the new teaching philosophy, made the evaluation standard more stringent, improved the evaluation process, simplified the evaluation project strengthened the requirements for classroom effectiveness, and clarified the direction of teachers' classroom teaching improvement. The evaluation of classroom teaching quality should do three "seeing": seeing the teachers, seeing the process and seeing the students.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 14
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The research of the classroom teaching quality based on AHP and Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation
    Qi Yan-ming
    Wang Chang-long
    2009 IITA INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONTROL, AUTOMATION AND SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 508 - +
  • [42] Evaluation of classroom teaching standards
    Pietsch, Marcus
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ERZIEHUNGSWISSENSCHAFT, 2010, 13 (01): : 121 - 148
  • [43] The university is the classroom: teaching and learning technology commercialization at a technological university
    Jonathan Levie
    The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2014, 39 : 793 - 808
  • [44] The university is the classroom: teaching and learning technology commercialization at a technological university
    Levie, Jonathan
    JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, 2014, 39 (05): : 793 - 808
  • [45] On the quality of students' evaluations of university teaching: An answer to evaluation critique
    Rindermann, H
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PADAGOGISCHE PSYCHOLOGIE, 1996, 10 (3-4): : 129 - 145
  • [46] Evaluation of University Teaching Quality Based on Hadoop and Deep Mining
    Zhao, Juxue
    2022 6TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER SCIENCE AND INTELLIGENT CONTROL, ISCSIC, 2022, : 118 - 122
  • [47] Methodology for Analysis and Quantitative Evaluation of Teaching Quality in University Subjects
    Arenas Reina, Jose Manuel
    Cano-Moreno, Juan David
    Sanchez Martinez, Francisca Victoria
    Islan Marcos, Manuel
    MATHEMATICS, 2021, 9 (08)
  • [48] Evaluation of the quality of assistance at the Mastology Teaching Unit of the University Hospital
    Camejo, Natalia
    Castillo, Cecilia
    Richter, Lucia
    Artagaveytia, Nora
    Hernandez, Ana L.
    Castro, Teresa
    Castillo, Andrea
    Sciuto, Pablo
    Lavina, Guillermo
    Bernachin, Julia
    Milans, Soledad
    Lavista, Fernando
    Vilas, Ana
    Delgado, Lucia
    REVISTA MEDICA DEL URUGUAY, 2015, 31 (03): : 165 - 171
  • [49] Graduate Teaching Mode Exploration Based on the Teaching Concept of Flipped Classroom
    Chen, Yanhui
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2016 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT, EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY AND SPORTS SCIENCE (METSS 2016), 2016, 25 : 628 - 631
  • [50] A Survey of Heuristic Teaching Status in University Classroom
    Deng Qunzhao
    Lin Yongqin
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2008 INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR ON EDUCATION MANAGEMENT AND ENGINEERING, 2008, : 596 - 601