Interfacial segregation and grain boundary embrittlement: An overview and critical assessment of experimental data and calculated results

被引:178
|
作者
Lejcek, Pavel [1 ]
Sob, Mojmir [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Paidar, Vaclav [1 ]
机构
[1] Acad Sci Czech Republ, Inst Phys, Na Slovance 2, Prague 18221 8, Czech Republic
[2] Masaryk Univ, CEITEC MU, Kamenice 5, Brno 62500, Czech Republic
[3] Acad Sci Czech Republ, Inst Phys Mat, Zizkova 22, Brno 61662, Czech Republic
[4] Masaryk Univ, Fac Sci, Dept Chem, Kotlarska 2, CS-61137 Brno, Czech Republic
关键词
Solute segregation; Interfacial embrittlement; Grain boundary; Free surface; Computer modeling; Measurements of local composition; AUGER-ELECTRON-SPECTROSCOPY; EQUILIBRIUM SURFACE SEGREGATION; ZINC-INDUCED EMBRITTLEMENT; SOLUTE-ATOM SEGREGATION; ALLOYING ELEMENTS; 1ST PRINCIPLES; INTERGRANULAR EMBRITTLEMENT; HYDROGEN EMBRITTLEMENT; IMPURITY SEGREGATION; CARBON SEGREGATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.pmatsci.2016.11.001
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
One of the most dangerous technical failures of materials is intergranular brittle fracture ( temper embrittlement) as it proceeds very quickly and its appearance is often hardly predictable. It is known that this phenomenon is closely related to the chemistry of grain boundaries and to the difference of the segregation energies of the grain boundaries and the free surfaces (RiceWang model). To elucidate the effect of individual solutes on embrittlement of various materials such as steels and nickel-base superalloys, grain boundary and surface segregation was extensively studied in many laboratories. As a result, numerous data on surface and grain boundary segregation have been gathered in literature. They were obtained in two main ways, by computer simulations and from experiments. Consequently, these results are frequently applied to quantify the embrittling potency of individual solutes. Unfortunately, the values of the segregation energy of a solute at grain boundaries as well as at the surfaces obtained by various authors sometimes differ by more than one order of magnitude: such a difference is unacceptable as it cannot provide us with representative view on the problem of material temper embrittlement. In some cases it seems that these values do not properly reflect physical reality or are incorrectly interpreted. Due to the above mentioned large scatter of the segregation and embrittlement data a critical assessment of the literature results is highly needed which would enable the reader to avoid both the well known and less well known pitfalls in this field. Here we summarize the available data on interfacial segregation and embrittlement of various solutes in nickel and bcc iron and critically discuss their reliability, assessing also limitations of individual approaches employed to determine the values of segregation and strengthening/embrittling energies, such as density functional theory, Monte Carlo method, molecular statics and dynamics and tight binding on the theoretical side, and Auger electron spectroscopy, 3D tomographic atom probe, and electron microscopy techniques on the experimental side. We show that experimental methods have serious limitations which can be overcome by accepting reasonable assumptions and models. On the other hand, the theoretical approaches are limited by the size of the computational repeat cell used for the calculations of the segregation energy. In both cases, a careful critical analysis of the available segregation energy and/or enthalpy reflecting physical reality allows to assess the reliability of these values and their applicability in analysis of intergranular brittle fracture in steels and nickel-base alloys. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 139
页数:57
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Extraction of the segregation term from the triple product of grain boundary diffusion: Reconsideration of experimental data
    Bokstein, B
    Ostrovsky, A
    Bernardini, J
    INTERGRANULAR AND INTERPHASE BOUNDARIES IN MATERIALS, IIB98, 1999, 294-2 : 581 - 584
  • [42] A combined experimental and theoretical approach to grain boundary structure and segregation
    Pennycook, SJ
    Chisholm, MF
    Yan, Y
    Duscher, G
    Pantelides, ST
    PHYSICA B-CONDENSED MATTER, 1999, 273-4 : 453 - 457
  • [43] Suppression of the thermal embrittlement induced by sulfur segregation to grain boundary in Ni-based electrodeposits
    Matsui, Isao
    Hisai, Yukihiro
    Uesugi, Tokuteru
    Omura, Naoki
    Takigawa, Yorinobu
    Higashi, Kenji
    MATERIALIA, 2019, 6
  • [44] Substitutional solute grain boundary segregation enhances resistance to hydrogen embrittlement in compositionally complex alloys
    Liu, Weihong
    Zhu, Lingyu
    Zhuang, Xiaoqiang
    Ding, Chendong
    Zhao, Yilu
    Liu, Chain Tsuan
    Yang, Tao
    Wu, Zhaoxuan
    ACTA MATERIALIA, 2025, 286
  • [45] Modelling of grain boundary segregation kinetics that are responsible on irreversible and reversible temper embrittlement of engineering steels
    Kovalev, A
    Wainstein, D
    JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE IV, 2004, 120 : 69 - 77
  • [46] Study of embrittlement induced by sulfur segregation on metal grain boundary using the ReaxFF force field
    Shin, Yun Kyung
    van Duin, Adri
    Kwak, Shaun
    Vasenkov, Alex
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2012, 244
  • [47] Role of grain boundary character on oxygen and hydrogen segregation-induced embrittlement in polycrystalline Ni
    Jie Chen
    Avinash M. Dongare
    Journal of Materials Science, 2017, 52 : 30 - 45
  • [48] Role of grain boundary character on oxygen and hydrogen segregation-induced embrittlement in polycrystalline Ni
    Chen, Jie
    Dongare, Avinash M.
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE, 2017, 52 (01) : 30 - 45
  • [49] Coupled stress-diffusion modelling of grain boundary segregation and dynamic embrittlement in a copper alloy
    Benabou, L.
    MODELLING AND SIMULATION IN MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2019, 27 (04)
  • [50] First-principles study on the grain boundary embrittlement of bcc-Fe by Mn segregation
    Ito, Kazuma
    Sawada, Hideaki
    Ogata, Shigenobu
    PHYSICAL REVIEW MATERIALS, 2019, 3 (01):