Estimation of median effective effect-site concentration (EC50) during target-controlled infusion of propofol for dilatation and curettage - A prospective observational study

被引:3
|
作者
Jaya, Velraj [1 ]
Madhula, P. [2 ]
Kumar, V. R. Hemanth [2 ]
Rajadurai, Daniel [3 ]
机构
[1] Jawaharlal Inst Postgrad Med Educ & Res, Dept Anaesthesiol, Pondicherry, India
[2] Mahatma Gandhi Med Coll & Res Inst, Dept Anaesthesiol, Pondicherry, India
[3] Galaxy Hosp, Dept Anaesthesiol, Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
Dilatation and curettage; infusion pumps; propofol; UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY; MANUALLY CONTROLLED INFUSION; PHARMACOKINETIC MODELS; SEQUENTIAL ALLOCATION; DESIGN; BOLUS;
D O I
10.4103/ija.ija_547_21
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background and Aims: Propofol is the drug of choice for sedation in daycare procedures due to its pharmacokinetic properties. Propofol delivery using target-controlled infusion (TCI) pump reduces adverse effects like hypotension and apnoea. In this study, we estimated the median effective effect-site concentration of propofol in patients undergoing dilatation and curettage. Methods: Patients of the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class I-III, aged 40-70 years, undergoing elective dilatation and curettage were recruited for the study. All patients received 1 mu g/kg fentanyl and 20 mg lignocaine. The first patient received an effect-site concentration of propofol at 4 mu g/mL with TCI Schneider pharmacokinetic model. Failure was defined as patient movement at any time during the procedure. According to the 'BiasedCoin Design' up-and-down sequential method, the response of the previous patient determined the effect-site concentration of propofol of the next patient. The study was terminated once forty patients completed the procedures successfully. Probit analysis was used to determine EC50. Results: Fifty-three patients were recruited for the study. The various effect-site concentrations of propofol EC50, EC90, and EC95 in providing sedation for dilatation and curettage were 3.38 mu g/mL, 4.29 mu g/mL, and 4.60 mu g/mL, respectively. The incidence of hypotension and apnoea were comparable among the various concentrations of propofol. The mean duration of the propofol infusion was 20 +/- 2.86 min. The time to recovery from propofol sedation was 6.97 +/- 1.76 min. Conclusion: A median effective effect-site concentration of 3.38 mu g/mL of propofol is required to prevent patient movement during uterine dilatation and curettage.
引用
收藏
页码:174 / 179
页数:6
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [31] Comparison of the effect-site concentrations of remifentanil for Streamlined Liner of the Pharynx Airway (SLIPA™) versus laryngeal mask airway SoftSeal™ insertion during target-controlled infusion of propofol
    Kim, S. H.
    Choi, E. M.
    Chang, C. H.
    Kim, H. K.
    Chung, M. H.
    Choi, Y. R.
    ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 2011, 39 (04) : 611 - 617
  • [32] Comparison of Target Concentration of Propofol During Three Phases of Liver Transplant Surgery Using Target Controlled Infusion of Propofol Total Intravenous Anaesthesia -A Prospective, Observational Study
    Garg, Neha
    Kalra, Yatin
    Arora, Mahesh
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2024, 139 (06): : 2820 - 2821
  • [33] Age influences on Propofol estimated brain concentration and entropy during maintenance and at return of consciousness during total intravenous anesthesia with target-controlled infusion in unparalyzed patients: An observational prospective trial
    Linassi, Federico
    Kreuzer, Matthias
    Maran, Eleonora
    Farnia, Antonio
    Zanatta, Paolo
    Navalesi, Paolo
    Carron, Michele
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (12):
  • [34] The comparison of predictive performance in bispectral index prediction during target effect-site controlled infusion of propofol using different blood effect-site equilibration rate constants in the same pharmacokinetic model
    Choi, Byung-Moon
    Bang, Ji-Youn
    Jung, Kyeo-Woon
    Lee, Ju-Hyun
    Bae, Heon-Yong
    Noh, Gyu-Jeong
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2013, 65 (04) : 299 - 305
  • [35] Target-Controlled Sedation with Propofol Infusion for PEG-J Placement in Advanced Parkinson's Disease: A Prospective Observational Study on Safety and Feasibility
    Szederjesi, Janos
    Saplacan, Irina
    Lazar, Alexandra
    Keresztes, Matild
    Muller-Serban, Georgiana-Mihaela
    Szasz, Jozsef Attila
    Grigorescu, Bianca Liana
    LIFE-BASEL, 2025, 15 (03):
  • [36] Prediction of effect-site concentration of sufentanil by dose-response target controlled infusion of sufentanil and propofol for analgesic and sedation maintenance in burn dressing changes
    Chen, Lingyang
    Wang, Mingcang
    Xiang, Haifei
    Lin, Xianju
    Cao, Donghang
    Ye, Liyue
    BURNS, 2014, 40 (03) : 455 - 459
  • [37] Evaluating Midazolam's Influence on Bispectral Index and Propofol Concentrations Using Schnider and Eleveld Models in Target-Controlled Infusion General Anesthesia: A Prospective Observational Study
    Linassi, Federico
    Zanatta, Paolo
    Kreuzer, Matthias
    Ciavattini, Emma
    Rizzetto, Christian
    Carron, Michele
    LIFE-BASEL, 2025, 15 (02):
  • [38] Effect-site concentration of remifentanil for blunting hemodynamic responses to tracheal intubation using light wand during target controlled infusion-total intravenous anesthesia
    Yon, Jun Heum
    Jo, Jae Keun
    Kwon, Young-Suk
    Park, Hae-Gyun
    Lee, Sangseok
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2011, 60 (06) : 398 - 402
  • [39] Supreme™ laryngeal mask airway insertion requires a lower concentration of sevoflurane than ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway insertion during target-controlled remifentanil infusion: a prospective randomised controlled study
    Monteserin-Matesanz, Cristina
    Gonzalez, Tatiana
    Anadon-Baselga, Maria Jose
    Zaballos, Matilde
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [40] Supreme™ laryngeal mask airway insertion requires a lower concentration of sevoflurane than ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway insertion during target-controlled remifentanil infusion: a prospective randomised controlled study
    Cristina Monteserín-Matesanz
    Tatiana González
    María José Anadón-Baselga
    Matilde Zaballos
    BMC Anesthesiology, 20