A new energy flux method for inspection of contact layer reticles

被引:2
|
作者
Volk, W [1 ]
Garcia, H [1 ]
Becker, C [1 ]
Chen, G [1 ]
Watson, S [1 ]
机构
[1] KLA Tencor, San Jose, CA 95134 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1117/12.476918
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
With growing implementation of low k1 lithography on DUV scanners for wafer production, detecting and analyzing photomask critical dimension (CD) errors and semitransparent defects is vital for qualifying photomasks to enable high IC wafer yields for 130nm and 100nm nodes. Using the TeraStar(TM) pattern inspection system's image computer platform, a new algorithm, TeraFlux(TM), has been implemented and tested for the inspection of small "closed" features. The current algorithm is run in die-to-die mode and compares the energy flux differences on features between die for small closed features, such as, contacts, trenches, and cells on chrome and half-tone reticles. Tests show the new algorithm provides CD error detection to 5% energy flux variation with low false defect counts. The dispositioning of very small CD errors typically requires the precision and resolution of a CD-SEM. A new capability has been developed for review of very small CD errors for this application, which displays the energy flux difference between any corresponding closed features on different die. We have characterized the sensitivity and false defect performance of the new energy flux algorithm with production masks and programmed defect test masks. The program defect test mask contains two sets of contacts at 600nm and 800mn design sizes. At each design size there are six defect types in both dense and sparse geometry. The programmed defects are designed to have 1% energy increments for defect sizes from 1% to 10%, and 2% energy increments from 10% to 30%. A sampling of inspection results will be presented. SEM measurements were taken at programmed defect locations to develop a correlation between the energy flux difference and the measured CD.
引用
收藏
页码:499 / 510
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Magnetic-Charge Element Method for Magnetic Flux Leakage Inspection
    Zhang, Shizhong
    Li, Hongmei
    Zhao, Chuntian
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT, 2022, 71
  • [32] Magnetic flux leakage testing theory and method for magnetizer end inspection
    Cheng, SF
    Wu, XJ
    Kang, YH
    ADVANCES IN NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION, PT 1-3, 2004, 270-273 : 636 - 641
  • [33] Layer-by-layer polyelectrolyte films for contact electric energy harvesting
    Guo, X. D.
    Helseth, L. E.
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICS D-APPLIED PHYSICS, 2015, 48 (07)
  • [34] TOTAL-FLUX MAGNETIC METHOD FOR INSPECTION OF INSTALLED FERROMAGNETIC TUBING
    KIRKWOOD, JG
    STANLEY, RK
    MATERIALS EVALUATION, 1992, 50 (04) : 502 - 505
  • [35] The contact layer method in calculating of the shear compounds
    Andreev, Vladimir
    Turusov, Robert
    Tsybin, Nikita
    RSP 2017 - XXVI R-S-P SEMINAR 2017 THEORETICAL FOUNDATION OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2017, 117
  • [36] A new method for identifying osmotically limited and gel layer controlled pressure independent flux in ultrafiltration
    Zaidi, SK
    Karode, SK
    Kirpalani, D
    Kumar, A
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2004, 82 (02): : 343 - 348
  • [37] A new method for estimating aerosol mass flux in the urban surface layer using LAS technology
    Yuan, Renmin
    Luo, Tao
    Sun, Jianning
    Liu, Hao
    Fu, Yunfei
    Wang, Zhien
    ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2016, 9 (04) : 1925 - 1937
  • [38] Equivalent method for normal contact stiffness considering plastic contact layer
    Liu, Yi
    Liu, Heng
    Yi, Jun
    Wang, Wei-Min
    Zhendong yu Chongji/Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2013, 32 (07): : 43 - 47
  • [39] INSPECTION OF CONTACT ASSEMBLIES IN SPOT WELDING BY THE ACOUSTIC EMISSION METHOD.
    Veselyanskii, Yu.S.
    Voron'ko, V.Ya.
    Welding Production (English translation of Svarochnoe Proizvodstvo), 1985, 32 (03): : 17 - 20
  • [40] A Machine vision method for non-contact Tool Wear Inspection
    Yu, Jianbo
    Zhou, Junjie
    2020 CHINESE AUTOMATION CONGRESS (CAC 2020), 2020, : 1239 - 1243