Environmental efficiency of disaggregated energy R&D expenditures in OECD: a bootstrap DEA approach

被引:47
|
作者
Kocak, Emrah [1 ]
Kinaci, Harun [2 ]
Shehzad, Khurram [3 ]
机构
[1] Erciyes Univ, Fac Econ & Adm Sci, Dept Econ, TR-38039 Melikgazi Kayseri, Turkey
[2] Erciyes Univ, Fac Econ & Adm Sci, Dept Business Adm, TR-38039 Melikgazi Kayseri, Turkey
[3] Southeast Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Nanjing, Peoples R China
关键词
Sustainable environment; Environmental efficiency; Energy R& D expenditures; CO2; emissions; Bootstrap DEA; CO2 EMISSIONS REDUCTION; RENEWABLE ENERGY; INNOVATION; IMPACT; PERFORMANCE; INVESTMENT; ECONOMY; DEMAND; MODELS; POLICY;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-020-12132-w
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Two essential topics of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are accessible which are clean energy (SDG-7) and climate change action (SDG-13). Developments and innovations in energy technologies play an essential role in achieving these goals. Therefore, any country should use energy R&D expenditures, which are the primary source of energy innovation, most optimally. This paper aims to investigate the environmental efficiency of R&D expenditures for energy efficiency, renewable energy, hydro and fuel cells, fossil energy, nuclear energy, and other power and storage technologies in OECD countries using data envelopment analysis (DEA) and bootstrap DEA. Estimation findings indicate that only the USA ensures the environmental efficiency in energy R&D expenditures among OECD countries. Although Japan, Canada, France, Germany, and Italy cannot provide environmental efficiency in energy R&D, their scores are very close to the efficiency frontier. Portugal, Hungary, and Slovak Republic are the countries with the lowest environmental efficiency in energy R&D expenditures. At the end of the investigation, this paper also provides an empirical estimation of the extent to which inefficient countries should change their R&D spending to achieve efficiency.
引用
收藏
页码:19381 / 19390
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Educational efficiency in a dea-bootstrap approach
    Giambona, Francesca
    Vassallo, Erasmo
    Vassiliadis, Elli
    ECONOMICS BULLETIN, 2010, 30 (04): : 2709 - 2719
  • [32] ESTIMATING OF EFFICIENCY BASED ON DIFFERENT MODES OF TRANSPORTATION FOR OECD COUNTRIES: BOOTSTRAP DEA
    Manavgat, Gokce
    Demirci, Ayhan
    LOGFORUM, 2024, 20 (04) : 515 - 532
  • [33] Measuring the R&D efficiency of regions by a parallel DEA game model
    Zuo, Kairui
    Guan, Jiancheng
    SCIENTOMETRICS, 2017, 112 (01) : 175 - 194
  • [34] Measuring the R&D efficiency of regions by a parallel DEA game model
    Kairui Zuo
    Jiancheng Guan
    Scientometrics, 2017, 112 : 175 - 194
  • [35] The valuation of R&D expenditures in Japan
    Nguyen, Pascal
    Nivoix, Sophie
    Noma, Mikiharu
    ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 2010, 50 (04): : 899 - 920
  • [36] R&D expenditures and CEO compensation
    Cheng, SJ
    ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2004, 79 (02): : 305 - 328
  • [37] Creditor Rights and R&D Expenditures
    Seifert, Bruce
    Gonenc, Halit
    CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW, 2012, 20 (01) : 3 - 20
  • [38] Global Biomedical R&D Expenditures
    Young, Alison J.
    Terry, Robert F.
    Rottingen, John-Arne
    Viergever, Roderik F.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2014, 370 (25): : 2451 - 2451
  • [39] Energy market reforms in Turkey and their impact on innovation and R&D expenditures
    Sirin, Selahattin Murat
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2011, 15 (09): : 4579 - 4585
  • [40] Energy R&D towards Sustainability: A Panel Analysis of Government Budget for Energy R&D in OECD Countries (1974-2012)
    Sun, Inkyoung
    Kim, So Young
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (04):