Differences between IAEA and EU Basic Safety Standards

被引:0
|
作者
Janzekovic, Helena [1 ]
机构
[1] Slovenian Nucl Safety Adm, Litostrojska 54, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
In 2013 the European Union (EU) published the new basic safety standards "for protection against the dangerous arising from exposure to ionising radiation" as given in the text of the Council Directive 2013/ 59/Euratom. This directive was published after more than 15 years of thorough analyses of radiation protection issues and shall be transposed in all 28 EU Member States. The Directive is based on experiences with implementation of five Euratom Directives already transposed, on ICRP 103 publication published in 2007 and on new scientific data. In 2014 the IAEA published International Basic Safety Standards regarding radiation protection and safety of radiation sources, i.e. IAEA SS GSR Part 3, which is also based on the publication ICRP 103 and experiences of more than 160 IAEA Member States. Despite the fact that both texts regarding basic safety standards have been drafted in the same period of time and are based on the ICRP 103, i.e. introducing three exposure situations, there are some significant differences between both documents, e.g. in managing exposure situations related to industries using natural occurring radioactive materials. The differences span from variations in basic principles of radiation protection to distinctness in technical standards, such as the standard related to the exposure due to radon in workplaces. The presented systematic analysis of differences shall facilitate communication among EU MSs and other countries. This is particularly important taking into account world market of equipment producing ionising radiation, world market of materials and control of exposure of itinerant workers in all exposure situations.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Probabilistic Fault Displacement Hazard Assessment (PFDHA) for Nuclear Installations According to IAEA Safety Standards
    Valentini, Alessandro
    Fukushima, Yoshimitsu
    Contri, Paolo
    Ono, Masato
    Sakai, Toshiaki
    Thompson, Stephen C.
    Viallet, Emmanuel
    Annaka, Tadashi
    Chen, Rui
    Moss, Robb E. S.
    Petersen, Mark D.
    Visini, Francesco
    Youngs, Robert R.
    BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2021, 111 (05) : 2661 - 2672
  • [32] The Integrated Management System for New Nuclear Power Projects-Requirements of IAEA Safety Standards
    Li Xiaoping
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 25TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NUCLEAR ENGINEERING, 2017, VOL 5, 2017,
  • [33] IAEA and EU review progress on cooperation
    不详
    ATW-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUCLEAR POWER, 2018, 63 (03): : 190 - 191
  • [34] Some issues with the International Basic Safety Standards -: a time for reflection
    Wrixon, AD
    Bilbao-Alfonso, A
    Ortiz-López, P
    KERNTECHNIK, 2002, 67 (01) : 44 - 50
  • [36] IAEA DECOMMISSIONING SAFETY ACTIVITIES
    Ljubenov, Vladan
    Warnecke, Ernst
    Hannan, Mark
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION AND RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT 2009, VOL 2, 2010, : 415 - 420
  • [37] IAEA Nuclear Safety Meeting
    不详
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2011, 52 (06) : 28N - 30N
  • [38] Assessment of emergency safety showers against proposed EU and ANSI standards
    Burby, Martin.
    Nasr, Ghasem. G.
    Yule, Andrew. J.
    Hughes, Tony.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIPHYSICS, 2008, 2 (03) : 327 - 343
  • [39] IAEA MEETING ON GAMMA-RAY STANDARDS
    不详
    PTB-MITTEILUNGEN, 1985, 95 (06): : 444 - 444
  • [40] The new Basic Safety Standards Directive and its implications for environmental monitoring
    Janssens, Augustin
    Necheva, Christina
    Tanner, Vesa
    Turai, Istvan
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY, 2013, 125 : 99 - 104