Landscape effect for the Cervidaes Cervidae in human-dominated fragmented forests

被引:9
|
作者
Brazaitis, Gediminas [1 ]
Petelis, Kestutis [1 ]
Zalkauskas, Remigijus [1 ]
Belova, Olgirda [1 ]
Danusevicius, Darius [1 ]
Marozas, Vitas [1 ]
Narauskaite, Gintare [1 ]
机构
[1] Aleksandras Stulginskis Univ, LT-53361 Akademija, Kaunas District, Lithuania
关键词
Moose; Red deer; Roe deer; Landscape; Forest; Human disturbance; DEER CAPREOLUS-CAPREOLUS; MOOSE ALCES-ALCES; BLACK-TAILED DEER; HOME-RANGE SIZE; ROE DEER; RED-DEER; HABITAT SELECTION; PREDATION RISK; CERVUS-ELAPHUS; PELLET-GROUP;
D O I
10.1007/s10342-014-0802-x
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
We analyse the relationships between the main Cervidae [moose (Alces alces), red deer (Cervus elaphus) and roe deer (Capreolus capreolus)] species and a complex of environmental factors in an extensive fragmented landscape of Central Lithuania. The highest determining positive influence on moose density was the proportions of wet forest sites. In forest complexes with fewer proportions of wet sites, the most important factor was the total forest area. The proportion of shrub cover, upland and dense undergrowth area, and road density also has significant effect on moose density. The total area of forest complexes has the highest determining positive influence on red deer density. The highest density of red deer was calculated in large forest complexes (> 2,745 ha) with a < 17.6 % proportion of pine and < 36.5 % of deciduous forests. Other significant factors were core area, road density and urbanization level. Forest edge density has the highest influence on the roe deer populations. The highest density of roe deer was recorded on forest areas with > 51 m ha(-1) of edges in wet forest (> 25.4 %) dominating areas. The proportion of deciduous, coniferous mixed and pine forest, also shrub and density of edges also had significant effect.
引用
收藏
页码:857 / 869
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Carnivores and their prey in Sumatra: Occupancy and activity in human-dominated forests
    Widodo, Febri Anggriawan
    Imron, Muhammad Ali
    Sunarto, Sunarto
    Giordano, Anthony J.
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (03):
  • [22] Spatiotemporal patterns of lion space use in a human-dominated landscape
    Oriol-Cotterill, A.
    Macdonald, D. W.
    Valeix, M.
    Ekwanga, S.
    Frank, L. G.
    ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2015, 101 : 27 - 39
  • [23] PINE FOREST STRUCTURE IN A HUMAN-DOMINATED LANDSCAPE SYSTEM IN KOREA
    KAMADA, M
    NAKAGOSHI, N
    ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 1993, 8 (01) : 35 - 46
  • [24] Habitat Connectivity for the Conservation of Small Ungulates in A Human-Dominated Landscape
    Niyogi, Rajashekhar
    Sarkar, Mriganka Shekhar
    Hazra, Poushali
    Rahman, Masidur
    Banerjee, Subham
    John, Robert
    ISPRS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEO-INFORMATION, 2021, 10 (03)
  • [25] Human-dominated ecosystems
    Gallagher, R
    Carpenter, B
    SCIENCE, 1997, 277 (5325) : 485 - 485
  • [26] Next-generation tropical forests: reforestation type affects recruitment of species and functional diversity in a human-dominated landscape
    Wills, Jarrah
    Herbohn, John
    Moreno, Maria Opelia Maranguit
    Avela, Mayet S.
    Firn, Jennifer
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2017, 54 (03) : 772 - 783
  • [27] Can landscape heterogeneity promote carnivore coexistence in human-dominated landscapes?
    Philip J. Manlick
    Steve K. Windels
    James E. Woodford
    Jonathan N. Pauli
    Landscape Ecology, 2020, 35 : 2013 - 2027
  • [28] Assembly patterns of tree seedling communities in a human-dominated Tropical landscape
    Menezes, Tatiane G. C.
    Melo, Felipe P. L.
    AUSTRAL ECOLOGY, 2019, 44 (07) : 1204 - 1212
  • [29] Can landscape heterogeneity promote carnivore coexistence in human-dominated landscapes?
    Manlick, Philip J.
    Windels, Steve K.
    Woodford, James E.
    Pauli, Jonathan N.
    LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2020, 35 (09) : 2013 - 2027
  • [30] Adaptation of wild boar (Sus scrofa) activity in a human-dominated landscape
    Johann, Franz
    Handschuh, Markus
    Linderoth, Peter
    Dormann, Carsten F.
    Arnold, Janosch
    BMC ECOLOGY, 2020, 20 (01)